On 03/27/2015 11:36 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 20:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Can you put it in opal.h and give it a better name, maybe
opal_error_code() ?
Do we want it to be inlined all the time ? Feels more like something we
should have in opal.c
Also we only want to call it when we forward the error code up the
food chain, there are a number of cases where we look for specific OPAL
error codes.
yes. the forward is not systematic. opal.c looks like a better place.
-ERANGE looks also better when the return code is unexpected.
C.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
