Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Sunday 08 June 2008 17:54, Jon Loeliger wrote: Grant Likely writes: Oh, and we're going try to create the longest acked-by chain in Linux history. Cool :) Paul. So far, I think it looks like this, sorted: Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Olof Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sean MacLennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure, but I _think_ there are a few other PowerPC developers out there still... :-) jdl Acked-by: Matthias Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems that I have to post cpci405 patches for arch/powerpc soon. The board is still active! Nobody would believe it :-) Matthias ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:10:39 +0200 Matthias Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Acked-by: Matthias Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems that I have to post cpci405 patches for arch/powerpc soon. The board is still active! Nobody would believe it :-) I believe it. And that's all that matters. Well... that and you actually posting the patches :). josh ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
В Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:54:41 -0500 Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] пишет: Grant Likely writes: Oh, and we're going try to create the longest acked-by chain in Linux history. Cool :) Paul. So far, I think it looks like this, sorted: Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Olof Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sean MacLennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure, but I _think_ there are a few other PowerPC developers out there still... :-) With a little delay, but how could I miss it :) Acked-by: Vitaly Bordug [EMAIL PROTECTED] jdl ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Grant Likely writes:
Oh, and we're going try to create the longest acked-by chain in
Linux history.
Cool :)
Paul.
So far, I think it looks like this, sorted:
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Olof Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Sean MacLennan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure, but I _think_ there are a few other PowerPC
developers out there still... :-)
As there's no CHRP LongTrail support (bummer, mine died 4 years ago) left in
arch/ppc/, I don't mind you killing the whole arch/ppc/ ;-)
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say programmer or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
RE: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:46 AM To: Jon Loeliger Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Adrian Bunk; Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Jon Loeliger wrote: Grant Likely writes: Oh, and we're going try to create the longest acked-by chain in Linux history. Cool :) Paul. So far, I think it looks like this, sorted: Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Olof Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sean MacLennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking forward to meeting some of you at the Linux Symposium in July. -- John This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
Grant Likely writes: Oh, and we're going try to create the longest acked-by chain in Linux history. Cool :) Paul. So far, I think it looks like this, sorted: Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Olof Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Sean MacLennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure, but I _think_ there are a few other PowerPC developers out there still... :-) jdl ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
Grant Likely writes: BTW Paul, we agreed in your absence on IRC that you should take the honors of committing the kill arch/ppc patch and the associated top spot in LWN's top committers list... but there's a price. You may very well get mailed the bar tab from the ding-dong-arch-ppc-is-dead party at OLS this year. :-} I'll happily pick up the bar tab, but only if you guys will pay my airfare (business class of course :) so I can get to OLS and be at that party. :D Oh, and we're going try to create the longest acked-by chain in Linux history. Cool :) Paul. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
Adrian Bunk writes: BTW: I remember Paul wanted to get PReP under arch/powerpc/ working - should this be done before the big ppc removal? I have a PReP port for arch/powerpc that works for one machine, at least. :) The key part is the residual to device-tree converter that I posted some time back with a request for people to test it on their PReP machines, but I haven't heard back from anybody. I'm going to post the patch shortly anyway. Paul. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:53:47 +0300 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:11:48AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This commit (patch omitted due to size) is sitting in my local tree: commit 0d7efc1e80fc262bcc507a605482c5681e3f082a Author: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Jun 5 09:46:17 2008 -0500 ppc/4xx: Remove 4xx support from arch/ppc Remove support for PPC 403, 405, and 440 processors from arch/ppc. The arch/powerpc equivalents should be used. Boards that are not ported yet will need to be ported to arch/powerpc to have continued support. This looks like unneeded churn. Paulus, Can we just kill all of arch/ppc for .27 right now? Is anyone already working on doing this and the cleanups that will then be possible? Otherwise I'll be glad to contribute to it. :) I think we can handle it. Thanks though. josh ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:53:47 +0300 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:11:48AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This commit (patch omitted due to size) is sitting in my local tree: commit 0d7efc1e80fc262bcc507a605482c5681e3f082a Author: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Jun 5 09:46:17 2008 -0500 ppc/4xx: Remove 4xx support from arch/ppc Remove support for PPC 403, 405, and 440 processors from arch/ppc. The arch/powerpc equivalents should be used. Boards that are not ported yet will need to be ported to arch/powerpc to have continued support. This looks like unneeded churn. Paulus, Can we just kill all of arch/ppc for .27 right now? Is anyone already working on doing this and the cleanups that will then be possible? Otherwise I'll be glad to contribute to it. :) I think we can handle it. Thanks though. BTW Paul, we agreed in your absence on IRC that you should take the honors of committing the kill arch/ppc patch and the associated top spot in LWN's top committers list... but there's a price. You may very well get mailed the bar tab from the ding-dong-arch-ppc-is-dead party at OLS this year. :-} Oh, and we're going try to create the longest acked-by chain in Linux history. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:09:54PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: Adrian Bunk writes: BTW: I remember Paul wanted to get PReP under arch/powerpc/ working - should this be done before the big ppc removal? I have a PReP port for arch/powerpc that works for one machine, at least. :) The key part is the residual to device-tree converter that I posted some time back with a request for people to test it on their PReP machines, but I haven't heard back from anybody. I'm going to post the patch shortly anyway. Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a Motorola Powerstack II Pro4000 and recently reported (now fixed) 2.6.26-rc build problems with the rusty ppc code. You might have luck asking him for testing, thereby doubling the number of known-working machines. :) Paul. cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This commit (patch omitted due to size) is sitting in my local tree: commit 0d7efc1e80fc262bcc507a605482c5681e3f082a Author: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Jun 5 09:46:17 2008 -0500 ppc/4xx: Remove 4xx support from arch/ppc Remove support for PPC 403, 405, and 440 processors from arch/ppc. The arch/powerpc equivalents should be used. Boards that are not ported yet will need to be ported to arch/powerpc to have continued support. This looks like unneeded churn. Paulus, Can we just kill all of arch/ppc for .27 right now? g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:11:48 -0600 Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This commit (patch omitted due to size) is sitting in my local tree: commit 0d7efc1e80fc262bcc507a605482c5681e3f082a Author: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Jun 5 09:46:17 2008 -0500 ppc/4xx: Remove 4xx support from arch/ppc Remove support for PPC 403, 405, and 440 processors from arch/ppc. The arch/powerpc equivalents should be used. Boards that are not ported yet will need to be ported to arch/powerpc to have continued support. This looks like unneeded churn. Excellent. My prompting has succeeded. Though now I won't get to be on top of the top contributors list in the lwn.net pages like Kumar was. Oh well. Paulus, Can we just kill all of arch/ppc for .27 right now? Please. Pretty please? Acked-by: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] josh ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
RE: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linuxppc-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:19 AM To: Grant Likely Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:11:48 -0600 Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This commit (patch omitted due to size) is sitting in my local tree: commit 0d7efc1e80fc262bcc507a605482c5681e3f082a Author: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Jun 5 09:46:17 2008 -0500 ppc/4xx: Remove 4xx support from arch/ppc Remove support for PPC 403, 405, and 440 processors from arch/ppc. The arch/powerpc equivalents should be used. Boards that are not ported yet will need to be ported to arch/powerpc to have continued support. This looks like unneeded churn. Excellent. My prompting has succeeded. Though now I won't get to be on top of the top contributors list in the lwn.net pages like Kumar was. Oh well. Paulus, Can we just kill all of arch/ppc for .27 right now? Please. Pretty please? Acked-by: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] josh For what it's worth, Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to see this happen soon so a few stacked patches we have can finally go in. Steve This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:11:48 -0600 Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This commit (patch omitted due to size) is sitting in my local tree: commit 0d7efc1e80fc262bcc507a605482c5681e3f082a Author: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Jun 5 09:46:17 2008 -0500 ppc/4xx: Remove 4xx support from arch/ppc Remove support for PPC 403, 405, and 440 processors from arch/ ppc. The arch/powerpc equivalents should be used. Boards that are not ported yet will need to be ported to arch/powerpc to have continued support. This looks like unneeded churn. Excellent. My prompting has succeeded. Though now I won't get to be on top of the top contributors list in the lwn.net pages like Kumar was. Oh well. defconfig updates is the secret :) - k ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: 4xx support in arch/ppc is going away Real Soon Now
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:59:44 -0500 Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:11:48 -0600 Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This commit (patch omitted due to size) is sitting in my local tree: commit 0d7efc1e80fc262bcc507a605482c5681e3f082a Author: Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Jun 5 09:46:17 2008 -0500 ppc/4xx: Remove 4xx support from arch/ppc Remove support for PPC 403, 405, and 440 processors from arch/ ppc. The arch/powerpc equivalents should be used. Boards that are not ported yet will need to be ported to arch/powerpc to have continued support. This looks like unneeded churn. Excellent. My prompting has succeeded. Though now I won't get to be on top of the top contributors list in the lwn.net pages like Kumar was. Oh well. defconfig updates is the secret :) If only I had as many boards as you! ;) josh ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
