Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes

2008-12-18 Thread Jochen Friedrich 
Ben Dooks schrieb:

> Ok, but this isn't really a fix, so I'll look at putting it into my
> i2c-next tree, not i2c-fixes.

That's OK for me.

Thanks,
Jochen
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes

2008-12-18 Thread Ben Dooks 
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> > Mike Ditto (1):
> >   i2c-cpm: Detect and report NAK right away instead of timing out
> 
> Could you also have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/7452/ ?
> (Discussion at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch// )
> 
> IIRC, Kumar prefers to push this via your tree.

Ok, but this isn't really a fix, so I'll look at putting it into my
i2c-next tree, not i2c-fixes.

-- 
Ben (b...@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes

2008-12-17 Thread Jochen Friedrich 
Hi Ben,

> Mike Ditto (1):
>   i2c-cpm: Detect and report NAK right away instead of timing out

Could you also have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/7452/ ?
(Discussion at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch// )

IIRC, Kumar prefers to push this via your tree.

Thanks,
Jochen
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev