Re: build failure with current linus tree
Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:06:18AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Current linus tree fail to build for me for a 64bit powerpc config with: This is cause by commit 7563dc64585324f443f5ac107eb6d89ee813a2d2 Author: Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Sep 2 16:50:38 2008 +1000 powerpc: Work around gcc's -fno-omit-frame-pointer bug Is there a proper fix other than simply reverting that commit? Chris ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: build failure with current linus tree
Chris Friesen writes: Is there a proper fix other than simply reverting that commit? It appears that we have a choice between having CONFIG_FTRACE work with gcc 4 and not gcc 3 (the current situation), and having CONFIG_FTRACE work with gcc 3 and not gcc 4 (which is what we would have if that commit was reverted). I think more people use gcc 4 than gcc 3 these days, which is why I haven't reverted that commit. Paul. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: build failure with current linus tree
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:06:18AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Current linus tree fail to build for me for a 64bit powerpc config with: This is cause by commit 7563dc64585324f443f5ac107eb6d89ee813a2d2 Author: Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Sep 2 16:50:38 2008 +1000 powerpc: Work around gcc's -fno-omit-frame-pointer bug ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
