Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-05-16 Thread Suresh Chandra Mannava
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc this
 summer.  I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be 2.6.27. That 
 would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support arch/ppc.

 If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and work
 with us to port this over to arch/powerpc.

 Here is a list based on arch/ppc/platforms.  Its not intended to be
 complete but a general idea of what's left in arch/ppc.



I am still struggling to make SPRUCE work with 2.6.24 arch/ppc. I think no
body had tested 2.6.x on SPRUCE. I think there is some issue with cpc700 pic
driver.
I feel it is better to move SPRUCE along with other arch/ppc boards to
arch/powerpc

Thanks,
Suresh




 PPC_PREPe6xx
 PQ2ADS  82xxin arch/powerpc?
 TQM8260 82xx
 CPCI690 e6xx/mv64x60
 EV64260 e6xx/mv64x60
 CHESTNUTe6xx/mv64x60
 LOPEC   e6xx
 KATANA  e6xx/mv64x60
 HDPUe6xx/mv64x60
 MVME5100e6xx
 PAL4e6xx
 POWERPMC250 e6xx
 PPLUS   e6xx
 PRPMC750e6xx
 PRPMC800e6xx
 RADSTONE_PPC7D  e6xx
 SANDPOINT   e6xx
 SBC82xx 82xx
 SPRUCE  e6xx
 LITE520052xx
 EV64360 e6xx/mv64x60
 MPC86XADS   8xx in arch/powerpc
 MPC885ADS   8xx in arch/powerpc
 ADS8272 82xxin arch/powerpc

 4xx:
 BAMBOO  44x in arch/powerpc
 CPCI405 40x
 EBONY   44x in arch/powerpc
 EP405   40x in arch/powerpc
 BUBINGA 40x
 LUAN44x
 YUCCA   44x
 OCOTEA  44x
 REDWOOD_5   40x
 REDWOOD_6   40x
 SYCAMORE40x
 TAISHAN 44x in arch/powerpc
 WALNUT  40x in arch/powerpc
 XILINX_ML30040x
 XILINX_ML40340x

 - k
 ___
 Linuxppc-dev mailing list
 Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
 https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 22:27 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
 Marvin writes:
 
  will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch posted 
  some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or just let 
  it die quietly?
 
 No, I'm still planning on getting PReP support over to arch/powerpc,
 but getting time to work on it has been the difficulty.
 
 What sort of PReP do you have?

I have a 43P-140, which I bought on eBay a few weeks ago to add to the
Fedora testing pile. Foolishly I was trying to get the CHRP kernel
booting on it, just because it says 'chrp' in its device_type.

Unfortunately I seem to have killed it -- I tried to update its firmware
from TIG97251 to TIG04204 and although the update looked successful, it
never came back. Says 'F2A' on the diagnostic panel. I renamed the
firmware file on the floppy to 'precover.img' as the documentation
suggests, but it never even looks at the floppy drive when it starts up.

Anyone know if the firmware flash on these can be removed and flashed
externally, or have any better suggestions?

-- 
dwmw2

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Marvin
Hi,

On Saturday 19 April 2008 17:30:10 Kumar Gala wrote:
 This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc
 this summer.  I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be
 2.6.27.  That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support
 arch/ppc.

 If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and
 work with us to port this over to arch/powerpc.

 Here is a list based on arch/ppc/platforms.  Its not intended to be
 complete but a general idea of what's left in arch/ppc.

 PPC_PREPe6xx

will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch posted 
some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or just let 
it die quietly?

Marvin

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Paul Mackerras
Marvin writes:

 will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch posted 
 some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or just let 
 it die quietly?

No, I'm still planning on getting PReP support over to arch/powerpc,
but getting time to work on it has been the difficulty.

What sort of PReP do you have?

Paul.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:27:27PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
 Marvin writes:
 
  will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch posted 
  some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or just let 
  it die quietly?
 
 No, I'm still planning on getting PReP support over to arch/powerpc,
 but getting time to work on it has been the difficulty.
 
 What sort of PReP do you have?

On my side, I have MVME2[467]xx boards. But these are actually PPLUS
board but the residual data and boot methods are so similar to PreP
that they could be merged. The host bridge is flexible (the MVME5100
has the same PHB but a completely different layout set up by the
firmware IIRC). I have local patches in the tree I use (still 2.2)
that make the memory map more CHRP like (to have more PCI memory
space and less I/O space).

The main problem is that I'm short on cycles to work on porting
them to 2.6 (the other is that I'm not sure that it's worth
putting 2.6 on machines with 16MB of RAM, current kernels
with extremely stripped down configs are still much  larger
than the ones I run on these boards).

Gabriel
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Marvin

Hi Paul,

On Sunday 20 April 2008 14:27:27 Paul Mackerras wrote:
 Marvin writes:
  will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch
  posted some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or
  just let it die quietly?

 No, I'm still planning on getting PReP support over to arch/powerpc,
 but getting time to work on it has been the difficulty.

 What sort of PReP do you have?

IBM 7248 (aka Carolina) and Motorola Powerstack II (aka Utah) - currently 
running Debian with 2.6.18 kernel.

Marvin


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-19 Thread Kumar Gala
This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc  
this summer.  I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be  
2.6.27.  That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support  
arch/ppc.


If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and  
work with us to port this over to arch/powerpc.


Here is a list based on arch/ppc/platforms.  Its not intended to be  
complete but a general idea of what's left in arch/ppc.


PPC_PREPe6xx
PQ2ADS  82xxin arch/powerpc?
TQM8260 82xx
CPCI690 e6xx/mv64x60
EV64260 e6xx/mv64x60
CHESTNUTe6xx/mv64x60
LOPEC   e6xx
KATANA  e6xx/mv64x60
HDPUe6xx/mv64x60
MVME5100e6xx
PAL4e6xx
POWERPMC250 e6xx
PPLUS   e6xx
PRPMC750e6xx
PRPMC800e6xx
RADSTONE_PPC7D  e6xx
SANDPOINT   e6xx
SBC82xx 82xx
SPRUCE  e6xx
LITE520052xx
EV64360 e6xx/mv64x60
MPC86XADS   8xx in arch/powerpc
MPC885ADS   8xx in arch/powerpc
ADS8272 82xxin arch/powerpc

4xx:
BAMBOO  44x in arch/powerpc
CPCI405 40x
EBONY   44x in arch/powerpc
EP405   40x in arch/powerpc
BUBINGA 40x
LUAN44x
YUCCA   44x
OCOTEA  44x
REDWOOD_5   40x
REDWOOD_6   40x
SYCAMORE40x
TAISHAN 44x in arch/powerpc
WALNUT  40x in arch/powerpc
XILINX_ML30040x
XILINX_ML40340x

- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-19 Thread Grant Likely
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc this
 summer.  I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be 2.6.27.
 That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support arch/ppc.

  If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and work
 with us to port this over to arch/powerpc.

  Here is a list based on arch/ppc/platforms.  Its not intended to be
 complete but a general idea of what's left in arch/ppc.


  LITE520052xx

This is in arch/powerpc

  XILINX_ML30040x
  XILINX_ML40340x

These are also supported in arch/powerpc; we just don't have .dts
files for the reference designs merged yet.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-19 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 10:30 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
 This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc  
 this summer.  I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be  
 2.6.27.  That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support  
 arch/ppc.
 
 If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and  
 work with us to port this over to arch/powerpc.
 
 Here is a list based on arch/ppc/platforms.  Its not intended to be  
 complete but a general idea of what's left in arch/ppc.
 

snip

 OCOTEA  44x

I have one of these.  I'll port it eventually.

josh

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-19 Thread Chuck Meade
 This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc
 this summer.  I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be
 2.6.27.  That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support
 arch/ppc.

 If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and
 work with us to port this over to arch/powerpc.

 Here is a list based on arch/ppc/platforms.  Its not intended to be
 complete but a general idea of what's left in arch/ppc.

It would be nice to see the mbx860 get forward-ported.  I just have not
had any time to get to it.

Chuck
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev