2.6.25-rc3 Sequoia build - section mismatch(es)
Upon building the default Sequoia (AMCC-440EPx) configuration, the MODPOST step warns about section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 5 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' After using the CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH option, the section mismatches are cases in one of the following: 1) functions in the device initialization (.devinit) calls routines which are contained in the .text section; 2) functions in the device init section calls routines in the device exit section; 3) data structures in the .data section contain pointers to functions in the .devinit section or .devexit section; (note that these data structures are used during initialization) My question is, will this cause the code to malfunction? thanks, Steve ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
2.6.25-rc3 Sequoia build - section mismatch(es)
Upon building the default Sequoia (AMCC-440EPx) configuration, the MODPOST step warns about section mismatches: WARNING: modpost: Found 5 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' After using the ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
USB 2.0 Highspeed host with Xilinx/linux ?
Anyone have any experience/recommendations for doing USB 2.0 Highspeed hosts with Linux driver support, in a Xilinx environment ? -- Dave Lynch DLA Systems Software Development:Embedded Linux 717.627.3770 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dlasys.net fax: 1.253.369.9244Cell: 1.717.587.7774 Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list. "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
RE: TQM5200 2.6-denx SM501 voyager enabling problem.
Martin Krause wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Pedro Luis D. L. hotmail.com> writes: >> Hello, >> I'm working right now with a TQM5200 microcontroller on a STX5200 board. >> I'm having problems to enable SM501 video output using 2.6-denx kernel. The > > Have you tried to contact TQ-Components (the manufacturer of the TQM5200 > board)? Under the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] you should get help for > hardware and software questions to all of their products. > > Regards, > Martin Hi Martin, Well, that sounds like a very reasonable suggestion. I think I should give it a try. Maybe my bad experience with other providers pushed me to ask in this list before. But you're right! Regards, Pedro. > ___ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded _ Tecnología, moda, motor, viajes,…suscríbete a nuestros boletines para estar siempre a la última Guapos y guapas, clips musicales y estrenos de cine. ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
Re: TQM5200 2.6-denx SM501 voyager enabling problem.
Hi Pedro, Pedro Luis D. L. hotmail.com> writes: > Hello, > I'm working right now with a TQM5200 microcontroller on a STX5200 board. > I'm having problems to enable SM501 video output using 2.6-denx kernel. The Have you tried to contact TQ-Components (the manufacturer of the TQM5200 board)? Under the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] you should get help for hardware and software questions to all of their products. Regards, Martin ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
Re: 2.6.25-rc3 on mpc8548amc doesn't boot
On Feb 28, 2008, at 1:56 AM, maxime louvel wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted first to check how the kernel is behaving, with a few tests. > Then what is the best solution to do this ? > A patch from the 2.6.25-rc3 vanilla kernel ? 2.6.25-rc3 is fine. The best solution is against my git-tree (git:// git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git). -k ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
Re: 2.6.25-rc3 on mpc8548amc doesn't boot
On Feb 28, 2008, at 2:31 AM, maxime louvel wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question for submitting my changes: > As I said I have commented a few line in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile > #$(obj)/4xx.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 > #$(obj)/ebony.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 > #$(obj)/cuboot-taishan.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 > #$(obj)/cuboot-katmai.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 > #$(obj)/treeboot-walnut.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=40 > > I guess that shouldn't be integrated in my patch, should I ? > For what I have found on websearch that should come from my gcc > version (3.4.3 with specific stuff). > But still I needed that... I thought Josh published a patch to work around the toolchain issues people had. But yes, this shouldn't be part of the patch :) - k ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
Re: 2.6.25-rc3 on mpc8548amc doesn't boot
Hi, I have a question for submitting my changes: As I said I have commented a few line in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile #$(obj)/4xx.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/ebony.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/cuboot-taishan.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/cuboot-katmai.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=405 #$(obj)/treeboot-walnut.o: BOOTCFLAGS += -mcpu=40 I guess that shouldn't be integrated in my patch, should I ? For what I have found on websearch that should come from my gcc version ( 3.4.3 with specific stuff). But still I needed that... thanks, Maxime On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:56 AM, maxime louvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted first to check how the kernel is behaving, with a few tests. > Then what is the best solution to do this ? > A patch from the 2.6.25-rc3 vanilla kernel ? > > cheers, > Maxime > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, maxime louvel wrote: > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > I am answering my self sorry for the spam... > > > Just to say that my problem has been solve if someone has something > > > similar... > > > My changes were good, I just didn't compile the good file... > > > > Any plans to submit patches to add support for this board to the kernel? > > > > - k > > > > > > > -- > Maxime Louvel > 0044 7964 80 > 43 Allen road > Whitemore reans > WV60AW Wolverhampton > United Kingdom > -- Maxime Louvel 0044 7964 80 43 Allen road Whitemore reans WV60AW Wolverhampton United Kingdom ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
