Re: [PATCH] AMCC PPC460GT/EX PCI-E de-emphasis adjustment fix
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:53:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Tirumala R Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] During recent tests with PCI-E , it has been found the DRV + De-Emphasis values are not optimum. These new values are tested thouroughly. Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are sending out a patch for someone, you need to include your Signed-off-by as well. Just reply to this with it, no need to resend the just for this. Stefan, this looks good to me. Or at least as far as I can tell from the somewhat magic values :) Any comments? josh ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
RE: [PATCH] AMCC PPC460GT/EX PCI-E de-emphasis adjustment fix
Signed-off-by: Feng Kan [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Josh Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/22/2008 6:30 AM To: Feng Kan Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; Tirumala Reddy Marri; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMCC PPC460GT/EX PCI-E de-emphasis adjustment fix On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:53:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Tirumala R Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] During recent tests with PCI-E , it has been found the DRV + De-Emphasis values are not optimum. These new values are tested thouroughly. Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are sending out a patch for someone, you need to include your Signed-off-by as well. Just reply to this with it, no need to resend the just for this. Stefan, this looks good to me. Or at least as far as I can tell from the somewhat magic values :) Any comments? josh ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
Re: [PATCH] AMCC PPC460GT/EX PCI-E de-emphasis adjustment fix
On Friday 22 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:53:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Tirumala R Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] During recent tests with PCI-E , it has been found the DRV + De-Emphasis values are not optimum. These new values are tested thouroughly. Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are sending out a patch for someone, you need to include your Signed-off-by as well. Just reply to this with it, no need to resend the just for this. Stefan, this looks good to me. Or at least as far as I can tell from the somewhat magic values :) Any comments? Looks good for me too, so: Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, Stefan ___ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded