Bitkeeper trouble

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:56:39PM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote:

 bk pull used to work, (1 week ago) but
 now fails for me.

 [scameron at zuul lxppc24d]$ bk pull
 drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML//EN

 Anybody else seeing that?

 [scameron at zuul lxppc24d]$ bk version
 BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre5 20020330075529 for x86-glibc21-linux
 Built by: lm at redhat62.bitmover.com in /usr/build/bk-2.1.x-lm/src
 Built on: Sat Mar 30 00:29:33 PST 2002
 [scameron at zuul lxppc24d]$ cat BitKeeper/*/parent
 http://ppc.bkserver.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel

 Do I need a newer version of bitkeeper?
 I didn't see one around.

What does 'bk parent' say?  If it's not
bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing:
bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
and then pulling again.  I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to
be gone.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Bitkeeper trouble

[Roland Dreier]

 Tom == Tom Rini trini at kernel.crashing.org writes:

Tom I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to be gone.

Looks like Bitmover messed up the DNS for ppc.bkserver.net:

$ host ppc.bkserver.net
ppc.bkserver.netA   10.3.9.222

R.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Bitkeeper trouble

[Cameron, Steve]

 On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:56:39PM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote:
 
  bk pull used to work, (1 week ago) but
  now fails for me.
[...]
 What does 'bk parent' say?  If it's not
 bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing:
 bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
 and then pulling again.  I'm not sure why, but
 ppc.bkserver.net seems to
 be gone.

  bk parent http://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
  bk pull

works great.  Thanks! -- steve

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/