[linuxppc-embedded:] Re: QMC driver for 860?
Reinhard Schwillinsky wrote: > > Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> [...] >> P.S. Is there anyone in the list interested in this? >> Should I clean it up, and submit it? >> > Yes! I am interested in this! > rg Reinhard > > -- > > Reinhard SchwillinskyTel.: ++43/1/205 255/210 > Maxxio technologies GmbH Fax.: ++43/1/205 255/900 > Prinz Eugen Strasse 8A-1040 Vienna/Austria > > > > > OK, since there is apparently great interest (of two persons) I'll try and clean it up, so that only the relevant QMC bits remain. I will also add the change suggested by Joakim. In the meantime I'll try to find some hosting place for the current code so that you can see it. Keep in mind that a QMC driver by itself is not interesting. It is some kind of a meta-driver, that needs another 'instantazation' driver to make it something useful. I.e. it could be a simple read/write driver for connection to a codec, or it could be a ISDN driver. Anyway, please be patient. Pantelis Antoniou INTRACOM S.A. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
[linuxppc-embedded:] Re: QMC driver for 860?
Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > [...] > P.S. Is there anyone in the list interested in this? > Should I clean it up, and submit it? > Yes! I am interested in this! rg Reinhard -- Reinhard SchwillinskyTel.: ++43/1/205 255/210 Maxxio technologies GmbH Fax.: ++43/1/205 255/900 Prinz Eugen Strasse 8A-1040 Vienna/Austria ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
QMC driver for 860?
> > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > >>OK > >> > >>You asked for it ;). > >> > >>The file netvia_tsa.c is the actual QMC + stuff driver. > >>The file netvia_bri.c is an example driver. > >>The header files are the QMC definitions. > >> > >>Linux kernel version is 2.4.20. > >> > >>Don't hesitate to ask for any explanations. > >> > >>Pantelis > >> > >> > > > >Thanks a lot! > > > >I have just browsed the driver and I noticed that there is room for > >performance > >improvements in netvia_tsa.c w.r.t memcpy(). You can avoid the memcpy() call > >for received packets by using invalidate_dcache_range(). I did this for > >the 8xx_io/enet.c driver a few weeks ago(it's not in BK yet). > > > >See http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200210/msg00317.html > >and > >http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200210/msg00272.html > > > > Jocke > > > Yes, I know the trick. I'm looking forward to see your changes > make it in. As it stands I'm not tracking the BK PPC tree, but > the Linus tree. Being behind the company firewall, BK is not > very useful. The patch should apply to linus tree as well. There is just a small bug in my second version(the invalidate_dcache_range() call must be moved). > > In this driver case since I'm reading the packet in a non-cachable > area, and not directly in a skb, I'm not convinced that > the invalidate_dcache_range will be a great win. It should be a win since the patch removes the need for non-cachable memory and a memcpy()(only add a invalidate_dcache_range call for non cache coherent CPUs like the 8xx). Jocke > > If you do any performance testing I'm very interested in > your results. > > Pantelis > > P.S. Is there anyone in the list interested in this? > Should I clean it up, and submit it? Is QMC supported on other families than 8xx? If so I think it would be a good idea. The 862 even has the QMC built in so there must be a need for this. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
QMC driver for 860?
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>OK >> >>You asked for it ;). >> >>The file netvia_tsa.c is the actual QMC + stuff driver. >>The file netvia_bri.c is an example driver. >>The header files are the QMC definitions. >> >>Linux kernel version is 2.4.20. >> >>Don't hesitate to ask for any explanations. >> >>Pantelis >> >> > >Thanks a lot! > >I have just browsed the driver and I noticed that there is room for performance >improvements in netvia_tsa.c w.r.t memcpy(). You can avoid the memcpy() call >for received packets by using invalidate_dcache_range(). I did this for >the 8xx_io/enet.c driver a few weeks ago(it's not in BK yet). > >See http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200210/msg00317.html >and >http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200210/msg00272.html > > Jocke > > > > > Yes, I know the trick. I'm looking forward to see your changes make it in. As it stands I'm not tracking the BK PPC tree, but the Linus tree. Being behind the company firewall, BK is not very useful. In this driver case since I'm reading the packet in a non-cachable area, and not directly in a skb, I'm not convinced that the invalidate_dcache_range will be a great win. If you do any performance testing I'm very interested in your results. Pantelis P.S. Is there anyone in the list interested in this? Should I clean it up, and submit it? ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
QMC driver for 860?
> OK > > You asked for it ;). > > The file netvia_tsa.c is the actual QMC + stuff driver. > The file netvia_bri.c is an example driver. > The header files are the QMC definitions. > > Linux kernel version is 2.4.20. > > Don't hesitate to ask for any explanations. > > Pantelis Thanks a lot! I have just browsed the driver and I noticed that there is room for performance improvements in netvia_tsa.c w.r.t memcpy(). You can avoid the memcpy() call for received packets by using invalidate_dcache_range(). I did this for the 8xx_io/enet.c driver a few weeks ago(it's not in BK yet). See http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200210/msg00317.html and http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200210/msg00272.html Jocke ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
QMC driver for 860?
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >Hi all > >Does anyone know of a QMC driver for the PPC860? >It does not have to be perfect, I will take anything since >I have not been in this area before. > > Thanks > >Jocke > > > > > > > I have something that works for the MPC850. Unfortunately it is kinda complex and too much tied to my custom hardware to be of any use directly. I.e. be prepared to hack it a bit. Email me if you are interested... Pantelis Antoniou INTRACOM S.A. Greece ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
QMC driver for 860?
> >Hi all > > > >Does anyone know of a QMC driver for the PPC860? > >It does not have to be perfect, I will take anything since > >I have not been in this area before. > > > > Thanks > > > >Jocke > I have something that works for the MPC850. > Unfortunately it is kinda complex and too much tied > to my custom hardware to be of any use directly. > I.e. be prepared to hack it a bit. Email me if you are interested... > > Pantelis Antoniou > INTRACOM S.A. Greece Yes, please sent it. I am interested in any driver I can get my hands on. Even if it's not directly usable, I can always learn from it. Anybody else that have a QMC driver, please don't hesitate to send me a copy. Thanks Jocke ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
QMC driver for 860?
Hi all Does anyone know of a QMC driver for the PPC860? It does not have to be perfect, I will take anything since I have not been in this area before. Thanks Jocke ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
