Seems reasonable a zero based offset should check >= nitems value and
aligns with similar check in get_actions().
Reviewed-by: Chris Bagwell
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gerecke
> ---
> tools/xsetwacom.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/xsetwacom.c b/tools/xsetwacom.c
> index 7cf0d05..28332d1 100644
> --- a/tools/xsetwacom.c
> +++ b/tools/xsetwacom.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static void special_map_property(Display *dpy,
> XDevice *dev, Atom btnact_prop, i
>AnyPropertyType, &type, &format,
> &btnact_nitems,
>&bytes_after, (unsigned
> char**)&btnact_data);
>
> - if (offset > btnact_nitems)
> + if (offset >= btnact_nitems)
>{
>fprintf(stderr, "Invalid offset into %s property.\n",
> XGetAtomName(dpy, btnact_prop));
>goto out;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
>
> --
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> ___
> Linuxwacom-devel mailing list
> Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
>
--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev___
Linuxwacom-devel mailing list
Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
