Re: [lisp] Support draft-nexagon wg adoption

2019-11-21 Thread Alberto Rodriguez Natal (natal)
Thanks for the call Luigi.

Just in case, let me formally restate that I support the adoption of the 
document.

Thanks,
Alberto

From: lisp  on behalf of Luigi Iannone 
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:41 PM
To: Sharon Barkai 
Cc: "lisp-cha...@ietf.org" , "lisp@ietf.org list" 

Subject: Re: [lisp] Support draft-nexagon wg adoption

Hi,

happy to see that there is already support for this document.

This email formally opens the two weeks WG adoption call.

Please have a look at the document and send an email on whether you agree or 
not to adopt it.
(Silence is NOT consensus)


Thanks


Ciao


L.








On 19 Nov 2019, at 13:36, Sharon Barkai 
mailto:sharon.bar...@getnexar.com>> wrote:

Hey, following very productive session today and as discussed would like to 
formally ask group for draft adoption.

Cheers,
Sharon

--szb
Cell: +972.53.2470068
WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp


Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-12.txt

2019-11-21 Thread Fabio Maino (fmaino)
Sounds good. 

Next version will reflect this change.. 

Fabio

On 11/21/19, 10:29 AM, "Dino Farinacci"  wrote:

Ack.

Dino

> On Nov 21, 2019, at 10:27 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
> 
> may be we can drop that and keep only LISP-GPE.
> 
> L.
> 
> 
> 
>> On 21 Nov 2019, at 10:26, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
>> 
>> the shim headers.
>> 
>> L.
>> 
>>> On 21 Nov 2019, at 10:25, Dino Farinacci  wrote:
>>> 
>>> What are “related features”.
>>> 
>>> Dino
>>> 
 On Nov 21, 2019, at 10:17 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
 
 Hi Fabio,
 
 I would suggest that you change the text in section 5.1 as follows:
 
 OLD:
 
The detection of ETR capabilities to support multiple data 
plane 
encapsulations and shim headers is out of the scope of this 
document. 
Given that the applicability domain of LISP-GPE is a 
traffic-managed
controlled environment, ITR/ETR (xTR) configuration mechanisms 
may be used for this purpose.
 
 NEW:
 
The discovery of xTR capabilities to support LISP-GPE and 
related features 
is out of the scope of this document. 
Given that the applicability domain of LISP-GPE is a 
traffic-managed
controlled environment, ITR/ETR (xTR) configuration mechanisms 
may be used for this purpose.
 
 
 Other than that, the document looks good to me.
 
 Ciao
 
 L.
 
 
 
> On 19 Nov 2019, at 16:00, Fabio Maino (fmaino)  
wrote:
> 
> ___
 
 ___
 lisp mailing list
 lisp@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>> 
>> 
> 



___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp


Re: [lisp] Support draft-nexagon wg adoption

2019-11-21 Thread Fabio Maino (fmaino)
Hi Luigi,
as a co-author I support adoption of this document.

It’s a very interesting use case that leverages LISP aspects such as signal 
free multicast and pub-sub that are some of the most interesting features of 
the LISP protocol stack. It’s also a very interesting example of how LISP can 
support applications that have very unique mobility requirements.

Fabio



From: lisp  on behalf of Luigi Iannone 
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 10:41 AM
To: Sharon Barkai 
Cc: "lisp-cha...@ietf.org" , "lisp@ietf.org list" 

Subject: Re: [lisp] Support draft-nexagon wg adoption

Hi,

happy to see that there is already support for this document.

This email formally opens the two weeks WG adoption call.

Please have a look at the document and send an email on whether you agree or 
not to adopt it.
(Silence is NOT consensus)


Thanks


Ciao


L.








On 19 Nov 2019, at 13:36, Sharon Barkai 
mailto:sharon.bar...@getnexar.com>> wrote:

Hey, following very productive session today and as discussed would like to 
formally ask group for draft adoption.

Cheers,
Sharon

--szb
Cell: +972.53.2470068
WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp


Re: [lisp] Support draft-nexagon wg adoption

2019-11-21 Thread Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)
I also would like to support the adoption of the document by the WG

On 11/22/19, 1:57 AM, "lisp on behalf of Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" 
 wrote:

This is a space where the LISP model can make a big difference and something 
the WG should be spending time on. I support the adoption of the document by 
the WG.

-v


> On Nov 20, 2019, at 7:16 PM, Sharon Barkai  wrote:
> 
> As co-auth also support draft for interoperable edge brokering of shared EID 
> geo-state.
> 
> As “lisper” think mapped-overlay scales logically and/or algorithmically 
> addressable network-compute / multicast-channels.
> 
> * ref also Dino mobile node mcast demo
> 
> Combined believe this key to scale deployment per edge location for co-op 
> end-points for apps needing such termination / turn-around. 
> 
> --szb
> Cell: +972.53.2470068
> WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794
> 
>> On Nov 19, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Bruno Fernandez-Ruiz  wrote:
>> 
>> I believe the pub/sub + H3-server brokered model of communication fits 
>> naturally with LISP and addresses a hugely important networking requirement 
>> for continuously roaming mobility clients.
>> 
>> As such, I endorse the draft to be published as an informational RFC.
>> 
>> -b
>> 
>>> On 19 Nov 2019, at 06:36, Sharon Barkai  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey, following very productive session today and as discussed would like to 
>>> formally ask group for draft adoption. 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Sharon
>>> 
>>> --szb
>>> Cell: +972.53.2470068
>>> WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794
>>> ___
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
> 
> ___
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp


Re: [lisp] Support draft-nexagon wg adoption

2019-11-21 Thread Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
This is a space where the LISP model can make a big difference and something 
the WG should be spending time on. I support the adoption of the document by 
the WG.

-v


> On Nov 20, 2019, at 7:16 PM, Sharon Barkai  wrote:
> 
> As co-auth also support draft for interoperable edge brokering of shared EID 
> geo-state.
> 
> As “lisper” think mapped-overlay scales logically and/or algorithmically 
> addressable network-compute / multicast-channels.
> 
> * ref also Dino mobile node mcast demo
> 
> Combined believe this key to scale deployment per edge location for co-op 
> end-points for apps needing such termination / turn-around. 
> 
> --szb
> Cell: +972.53.2470068
> WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794
> 
>> On Nov 19, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Bruno Fernandez-Ruiz  wrote:
>> 
>> I believe the pub/sub + H3-server brokered model of communication fits 
>> naturally with LISP and addresses a hugely important networking requirement 
>> for continuously roaming mobility clients.
>> 
>> As such, I endorse the draft to be published as an informational RFC.
>> 
>> -b
>> 
>>> On 19 Nov 2019, at 06:36, Sharon Barkai  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey, following very productive session today and as discussed would like to 
>>> formally ask group for draft adoption. 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Sharon
>>> 
>>> --szb
>>> Cell: +972.53.2470068
>>> WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794
>>> ___
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
> 
> ___
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp