Re: [IFWP] ICANN's orientation
At 12:24 PM 9/13/99 +0200, you wrote: >Tony, > >Of course if would be appropriate to correct the wording on the >ICANN web site. But you know this has nothing to do with ICANN's >orientation. > >Or maybe from now on you will also complain whenever you see a US >phone number written without the US country prefix, saying that this >is an affront to all other countries, and accusing the author of >having an entirely US-centric agenda? Sure, don't you ? +1 (613) 473-1719 -- "So foul a sky clears not without a storm" - Shakespeare
Re: [IFWP] ICANN's orientation
Tony, Of course if would be appropriate to correct the wording on the ICANN web site. But you know this has nothing to do with ICANN's orientation. Or maybe from now on you will also complain whenever you see a US phone number written without the US country prefix, saying that this is an affront to all other countries, and accusing the author of having an entirely US-centric agenda? Regards, Werner "A.M. Rutkowski" wrote: > > ICANN's web site prominently advertises: > > To register a domain name, please > contact one of the ICANN Accredited > Registrars listed here. > > Of course, those registrars for the > most part, only register in 3 of > the 250 Top Level Domain zones in > the legacy root of interest to ICANN. > > Questions: > > 1. Isn't is rather skewed to be promoting > only these three domains? > > 2. Isn't this an affront to all the country > domain registrars and country oriented domain > communities worldwide? > > 3. Doesn't this represent a restraint of trade? > Shouldn't ICANN be promoting all Internet names > of any kind and in any root equally - instead > of only those sold by their own "accredited > registrars?" > > --tony -- Tel: +41 22 312 5600 Direct line: +41 22 312 5640 http://axone.ch Fax: +41 22 312 5601 2 cours de Rive CH-1204 Geneva, Switzerland
[IFWP] ICANN's orientation
ICANN's web site prominently advertises: To register a domain name, please contact one of the ICANN Accredited Registrars listed here. Of course, those registrars for the most part, only register in 3 of the 250 Top Level Domain zones in the legacy root of interest to ICANN. Questions: 1. Isn't is rather skewed to be promoting only these three domains? 2. Isn't this an affront to all the country domain registrars and country oriented domain communities worldwide? 3. Doesn't this represent a restraint of trade? Shouldn't ICANN be promoting all Internet names of any kind and in any root equally - instead of only those sold by their own "accredited registrars?" --tony