Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Nenhum_de_Nos]

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:19:45 -0500
Jim Thompson  wrote:

> pfSense is normally tested on the devices that Netgate has released as
> products over the past two years.
> 
> pfSense 2.3.2 was tested on the following devices and hypervisors:
> 
> SG-2220 (eMMC and M.2), SG-2440 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-4860 (eMMC and mSATA),
> SG-8860 (eMMC and mSATA), 7541 (CF and SSD), 7551 (CF and SSD), APU (not
> APU2) (nano on SD, full install on SD, and mSATA), ALIX, C2758, XG-1540,
> XG2758, AWS, Azure, OVA (VMware), as well as a KVM and bhyve images for
> internal use.
> 
> pfSense CE is tested against an otherwise unremarkable, ordinary 64-bit PC
> for the ISO, memstick and serial memstick images for both amd64 and i386
> architectures, including a "CE" install for the ADI (SG-) platforms
> above.  NanoBSD images are tested for both 2G and 4G CF cards for both
> amd64 and i386 for both VGA and non-VGA.  An amd64 OVA for pfSense CE is
> produced and tested as well.
> 
> For all the above, clean install as well as upgrade (from 2.3.1 and 2.2.6 )
> were tested.   Several parameters and items (I will not document them all)
> are checked after install or upgrade to ensure they are the expected value.
> 
> The full matrix takes several people several days to complete.
> 
> As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the
> 'nano' image.
> We are including ARM support (for the uFW) in pfSense 2.4.
> 
> Jim

I wonder if this was solved: 
http://marc.info/?l=soekris-tech=134826496814105=4

To refresh, net6501-70 would not run pfsense amd64 would need a special kernel 
options that was not there.
If this is not solved, no net6501 support on 2.4 ownwards.

thanks,

matheus

-- 
"We will call you Cygnus,
the God of balance you shall be."
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Vick Khera]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jim Thompson  wrote:
> As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the
> 'nano' image.

Does this imply that we will need to do a full re-install on our
Netgate APU's or will there be a clean self-upgrade process?
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Vick Khera]

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Ryan Coleman  wrote:
> So does this effect APUs running the AMD64 architecture?

I updated from 2.3.1 to 2.3.2 the APU at my home office with zero
problems. It just took a good long time to clone the boot slice before
updating, which also took a long time. The actual downtime was minimal
as it does boot really fast.
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Ryan Coleman]

As I remember it Alix support is not part of 2.4.



> On Jul 31, 2016, at 5:33 AM, Adrian Zaugg  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 30.07.16 06:19, Jim Thompson wrote:
>> As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the
>> 'nano' image.
> Do you mean by "i386" 32-bit X86 or really just i386 (asking because of
> Alix)?
> 
> Regards, Adrian.
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[J. Hellenthal]

Being that the current release is FreeBSD 10.3 based its a pretty good bet that 
if you don't see an image in the download directory for the ARM architecture 
then your answer is no.

Here is some information on FreeBSD ARM support for further knowledge. "AARCH64"
https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm


-- 
 Onward!, 
 Jason Hellenthal, 
 Systems & Network Admin, 
 Mobile: 0x9CA0BD58, 
 JJH48-ARIN

On Jul 31, 2016, at 00:21, Bob Gustafson  wrote:

Will the 2.4 run on Odroid C2 (arm, quad 64bit) running with the Ethernet and a 
USB<->Ethernet external converter to get 2 ports.


> On 07/29/2016 11:19 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the
> 'nano' image.
> We are including ARM support (for the uFW) in pfSense 2.4.

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Bob Gustafson]

Will the 2.4 run on Odroid C2 (arm, quad 64bit) running with the 
Ethernet and a USB<->Ethernet external converter to get 2 ports.



On 07/29/2016 11:19 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:

As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the
'nano' image.
We are including ARM support (for the uFW) in pfSense 2.4.


___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Ryan Coleman]

Thank you :)

> On Jul 29, 2016, at 11:19 PM, Jim Thompson  > wrote:
> 
> 
> SG-2220 (eMMC and M.2), SG-2440 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-4860 (eMMC and mSATA),
> SG-8860 (eMMC and mSATA), 7541 (CF and SSD), 7551 (CF and SSD), APU (not
> APU2) (nano on SD, full install on SD, and mSATA), ALIX, C2758, XG-1540,
> XG2758, AWS, Azure, OVA (VMware), as well as a KVM and bhyve images for
> internal use.

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Jim Thompson]

pfSense is normally tested on the devices that Netgate has released as
products over the past two years.

pfSense 2.3.2 was tested on the following devices and hypervisors:

SG-2220 (eMMC and M.2), SG-2440 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-4860 (eMMC and mSATA),
SG-8860 (eMMC and mSATA), 7541 (CF and SSD), 7551 (CF and SSD), APU (not
APU2) (nano on SD, full install on SD, and mSATA), ALIX, C2758, XG-1540,
XG2758, AWS, Azure, OVA (VMware), as well as a KVM and bhyve images for
internal use.

pfSense CE is tested against an otherwise unremarkable, ordinary 64-bit PC
for the ISO, memstick and serial memstick images for both amd64 and i386
architectures, including a "CE" install for the ADI (SG-) platforms
above.  NanoBSD images are tested for both 2G and 4G CF cards for both
amd64 and i386 for both VGA and non-VGA.  An amd64 OVA for pfSense CE is
produced and tested as well.

For all the above, clean install as well as upgrade (from 2.3.1 and 2.2.6 )
were tested.   Several parameters and items (I will not document them all)
are checked after install or upgrade to ensure they are the expected value.

The full matrix takes several people several days to complete.

As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the
'nano' image.
We are including ARM support (for the uFW) in pfSense 2.4.

Jim


On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Ryan Coleman  wrote:

> I presume you mean AMD… But that’s what the 64-bit code base is labeled
> as, regardless of Intel, AMD or other.
>
>
> > On Jul 29, 2016, at 9:50 PM, Alfredo Tapia Sabogal <
> alfred.ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So far i know pfsense have some issues related to the architecture of ADM
> >
> > CHEERS
> >
> > Alfredo Tapia Sabogal
>
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Alfredo Tapia Sabogal]

So far i know pfsense have some issues related to the architecture of ADM

CHEERS

Alfredo Tapia Sabogal
El jul. 29, 2016 9:38 PM, "Ryan Coleman"  escribió:

> Have we established an official bug for the newest release? I can babysit
> one installation on Sunday without an issue but it’s the one I cannot
> afford to lose (retail shop) that needs updating sooner rather than later
> (as I won’t have the time for a month)….
>
> So does this effect APUs running the AMD64 architecture?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

[pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

[Ryan Coleman]

Have we established an official bug for the newest release? I can babysit one 
installation on Sunday without an issue but it’s the one I cannot afford to 
lose (retail shop) that needs updating sooner rather than later (as I won’t 
have the time for a month)….

So does this effect APUs running the AMD64 architecture?

Please advise.

Thanks,
Ryan
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold