[REBOL] Core/View/etc. install plan Re:
Have rebol/view named rebolv and same home .. on linux, works. hiall - I know I queried regarding this before, but apparently failed to retain any answer that made sense to me. If I want to install Core and View, do I need to have them separate, or could I put everything together except the executables (sounds unlikely), or do I need both installed at all? Is Core a subset of View? yes Is the latest Core inherently more stable than the latest View? Or is it just the View-y parts of View that are less stable? normaly "official" view is more stable because of more recent, more bugs fixed. i think the beta means "don't rely on view/dialect, may be changed". otherwise they have to be carefull to keep legacy-code running. Is there an easy way of separating usr-lib and example scripts that only pertain to one executable or the other? [if system/product = 'view [ -script- ]] ; r = 'core or = 'command you can have a /core -version which checks for view to popup some choice-buttons :) -- Pete Wason|"LWATPLOTG"|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|CUCUG|TA|PHX
[REBOL] Core/View/etc. install plan Re:
If I want to install Core and View, do I need to have them separate, or could I put everything together except the executables (sounds unlikely), or do I need both installed at all? Not entirely sure why you would have to have them in the same directory, unless you are thinking about a single script library. I have a single "Rebol" directory with subdirectories of "Core" and "View". Each of these have their own standard .r files (user.r). I have a script manager that is defined in both user.r files so that it can utilise a shared script library for common scripts and specific script libraries if necessary. Is Core a subset of View? Yup. So unless you specifically want an exe without the GUI you can get away without Core - except that is the one that is non-beta. Is the latest Core inherently more stable than the latest View? Or is it just the View-y parts of View that are less stable? I think only RT could really answer this one properly. Is there an easy way of separating usr-lib and example scripts that only pertain to one executable or the other? See above. -- Pete Wason|"LWATPLOTG"|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|CUCUG|TA|PHX
