[REBOL] Interface and Implementation Re:(4)

1999-11-28 Thread Al . Bri 

Gabriele wrote:
 Andrew, I thought you had learned that there's so much difference
between C++ and REBOL... ;-)

So had I! :-)

 REBOL's objects are just contexts; being your 't correctly bound to
the right context, it evaluates to the correct value.

My C++ experience just shouted out to me, "Bad code! Bad code!"

Andrew Martin
Who's still tripping over his own experience...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Online @ 33,600 Baud!
--

[REBOL] Interface and Implementation Re:(4)

1999-11-27 Thread Al . Bri 

Elan wrote:
 Hope this helps,...

Thanks, Elan. I've been comparing my REBOL code too closely to my C++
code and forgetting that REBOL words are far more "smarter" than C++
variables. The closest relative in C++ is smart pointers.

Andrew Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Online @ 33,600 Baud!
--