[REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(3)
This problem sounds very odd. We do not forward ALLY to LIST. Either it is a bug in our email handling, or it is a bug in your client filters. I have not seen this problem here. The original message did not appear on my copy of the main REBOL list. I did not see any sign of the problem until you posted your reply to the list. I see no such duplication of messages (however, I do a lot of message filtering, so it is possible that the duplicates were filtered out on my side). Does anyone else see this problem? -Carl PS: We have been experiencing a few other problems with our lists in recent weeks, so I'll be "postmaster" again for a few days to iron out some of the glitches and add a few needed features. I'll also be moving the lists off our in-house server to another REBOL site that has higher speed service. At 2/26/00 06:36 PM +0100, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! On 25-Feb-00, you wrote: i This message is addressed to the REBOL/View Beta list. Will it i end up on the main REBOL list? If so, View Beta Selma is i forwarding its messages to the wrong list. It came with the following (stripped for brevity) header: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from brando.rebol.net (rebol.net [199.4.95.216]) by smv04.iname.net (8.9.3/8.9.1SMV2) with ESMTP id RAA24248 for [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from office.rebol.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.9]) by brando.rebol.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA02547; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:07:26 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:59:12 -0800 Subject: [ALLY] Testing REBOL/View Beta List X-SELMA: [ALLY] 6764 Hmm, ALERT! Conspiracy theory. MS overtaken REBOL Technologies. Hey, folks, anyone willing to join me to visit Ukiah? :-) -pekr- Regards, Gabriele. -- o) .-^-. (--o | Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila | | GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ | o) `-v-' (--o
[REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This problem sounds very odd. We do not forward ALLY to LIST. Either it is a bug in our email handling, or it is a bug in your client filters. I have not seen this problem here. The original message did not appear on my copy of the main REBOL list. I did not see any sign of the problem until you posted your reply to the list. I see no such duplication of messages (however, I do a lot of message filtering, so it is possible that the duplicates were filtered out on my side). Does anyone else see this problem? -Carl Carl, I have the same problem here. Here is cut off of your previous Ally post: Received: from atlanta.trz.cz (atlanta.sec.trz.cz [194.196.82.132]) by orion.trz.cz with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id YZT3XRPV; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 02:13:09 - Received: from brando.rebol.net (rebol.net [199.4.95.216]) by atlanta.trz.cz (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA00167 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 02:10:06 +0100 Received: from office.rebol.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.9]) by brando.rebol.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA19211; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:12:24 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:11:14 -0800 Subject: [ALLY] REB Site Updated Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-REBOL: 2.2.0.4.2 "The Internet Messaging Language (TM) WWW.REBOL.COM" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 X-SELMA: [ALLY] 6798 X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-UIDL: AAwwZIDAAAQne90rgAQkuGh0clz24pdb -pekr-
[REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(4)
This problem sounds very odd. We do not forward ALLY to LIST. Either it is a bug in our email handling, or it is a bug in your client filters. I have not seen this problem here. The original message did not appear on my copy of the main REBOL list. I did not see any sign of the problem until you posted your reply to the list. I see no such duplication of messages (however, I do a lot of message filtering, so it is possible that the duplicates were filtered out on my side). Does anyone else see this problem? -Carl PS: We have been experiencing a few other problems with our lists in recent weeks, so I'll be "postmaster" again for a few days to iron out some of the glitches and add a few needed features. I'll also be moving the lists off our in-house server to another REBOL site that has higher speed service. At 2/26/00 06:36 PM +0100, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! On 25-Feb-00, you wrote: i This message is addressed to the REBOL/View Beta list. Will it i end up on the main REBOL list? If so, View Beta Selma is i forwarding its messages to the wrong list. It came with the following (stripped for brevity) header: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from brando.rebol.net (rebol.net [199.4.95.216]) by smv04.iname.net (8.9.3/8.9.1SMV2) with ESMTP id RAA24248 for [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from office.rebol.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.9]) by brando.rebol.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA02547; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:07:26 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:59:12 -0800 Subject: [ALLY] Testing REBOL/View Beta List X-SELMA: [ALLY] 6764 Hmm, ALERT! Conspiracy theory. MS overtaken REBOL Technologies. Hey, folks, anyone willing to join me to visit Ukiah? :-) -pekr- Regards, Gabriele. -- o) .-^-. (--o | Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila | | GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ | o) `-v-' (--o -- Paolo Russo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ PERD s.r.l. Virtual Technologies for Real Solutions http://www.perd.com
[REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This problem sounds very odd. We do not forward ALLY to LIST. Either it is a bug in our email handling, or it is a bug in your client filters. I have not seen this problem here. The original message did not appear on my copy of the main REBOL list. I did not see any sign of the problem until you posted your reply to the list. I see no such duplication of messages (however, I do a lot of message filtering, so it is possible that the duplicates were filtered out on my side). I have filters set up in Netscape as follows: ALLY: the 'to' of this message 'is' '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' REBOL: the 'to' of this message 'is' '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Currently (in the last week) all the mails, including those with [ALLY] at the beginning of the header go to the REBOL folder. No duplicates though. - Chris
[REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(4)
Hi Carl Here is the header I got with your post "REB Site Updated": From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 17:03:32 2000 Received: by mail.ecotope.com from localhost (router,SLMail V2.7); Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:03:32 -0800 Received: by mail.ecotope.com from brando.rebol.net (199.4.95.216::mail daemon; unverified,SLMail V2.7); Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:03:31 -0800 Received: from office.rebol.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.9]) by brando.rebol.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA19286; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:13:28 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:11:14 -0800 Subject: [ALLY] REB Site Updated Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-REBOL: 2.2.0.4.2 "The Internet Messaging Language (TM) WWW.REBOL.COM" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 X-SELMA: [ALLY] 6798 Hope this helps Cheers Larry - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 1:48 AM Subject: [REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(3) This problem sounds very odd. We do not forward ALLY to LIST. Either it is a bug in our email handling, or it is a bug in your client filters. I have not seen this problem here. The original message did not appear on my copy of the main REBOL list. I did not see any sign of the problem until you posted your reply to the list. I see no such duplication of messages (however, I do a lot of message filtering, so it is possible that the duplicates were filtered out on my side). Does anyone else see this problem? -Carl snip---
[REBOL] Re: [ALLY] [REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(3)
Looks like someone messed with SELMA configuration and did not double check it. The original messages are sent to ALLY group of readers but with a [EMAIL PROTECTED] reply address. That's a config error on our part. Very embarrassing. Sorry. -Carl At 2/28/00 11:45 PM +1000, you wrote: Does anyone else see this problem? -Carl Yes since 25 Feb, all messages for Ally list have the standard [Ally] subject, but Return-Path, To and Reply-To are all [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are a number of duplicate messages... Here are a few of duplicates 6764, 6741, 6450, 6798, (6798 was your post today on the Reb Site Update.) Cheers, Allen K sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:
Hi guys, Sorry about this noise, I wasn't aware that apparently the problem has been resolved! ;- Elan [: - )]
