Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
[re-post: original message never made it to the list] Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Now, remember to test with all the usual browser-options, because I > might > At the moment that... > > SAP >headhunter > ...is showing up in IE/win when I use the 'ignore font size' option. > You should cover it better... Done! That's the best site check I ever had, please keep throwing them at me Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com smile.gif Description: GIF image wink.gif Description: GIF image
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Now, remember to test with all the usual browser-options, because I > might :-) > At the moment that... > > SAP >headhunter > ...is showing up in IE/win when I use the 'ignore font size' option. > You should cover it better... Fixed! That's the best site check I ever got, please keep throwing them at me ;-) Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
Thierry Koblentz wrote: Doh! Talk about totally missing the big picture here. LOL Happens to me all the time. Must be old age - or something. *Thanks*. You're welcome. Now, remember to test with all the usual browser-options, because I might :-) At the moment that... SAP headhunter ...is showing up in IE/win when I use the 'ignore font size' option. You should cover it better... regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Not necessary, as you can have elastic layouts without using em on > individual containers. I just tested on a copy of your page, and it > behaves just fine even though I didn't go in depth or looked at your > CSS. Doh! Talk about totally missing the big picture here. LOL *Thanks*. Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/roel/ Left column not well prepared for my standard option... 'min font size = 14px'. Same "overshooting" result in Firefox 1.5 and Opera 9tp2. I can't think of a "fix" besides creating a large gutter between the two columns... Not necessary, as you can have elastic layouts without using em on individual containers. I just tested on a copy of your page, and it behaves just fine even though I didn't go in depth or looked at your CSS. The "trick" (which should be used more often, IMO) is to set 'em'-width only on the outer container and '%'-width on all the others. Your layout is so close to an ordinary '25%+75% 2-column float construct' that it'll come out fine with such values. Some slight margin-adjustments will take care of the rest across browser-land My "hope" is that users with such settings will know how to take advantage of that elastic layout; two simple "Ctrl++" should take care of the "issue". :-) Guess so. However, we use such minimum-settings so we won't have to click anything. That's the whole idea. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/roel/ > > Left column not well prepared for my standard option... > 'min font size = 14px'. Same "overshooting" result in Firefox 1.5 and > Opera 9tp2. I can't think of a "fix" besides creating a large gutter between the two columns... My "hope" is that users with such settings will know how to take advantage of that elastic layout; two simple "Ctrl++" should take care of the "issue". Thanks. Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
Thierry Koblentz wrote: http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/roel/ Left column not well prepared for my standard option... 'min font size = 14px'. Same "overshooting" result in Firefox 1.5 and Opera 9tp2. Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
Christian Montoya wrote: > On 4/10/06, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm particularly interested in the "behavior" of the boxes with drop >> shadow on the home page across browsers. >> http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/roel/ > > They look fine in FF 1.5 Win but they are off to the right in Opera 8 > Win. I don't know if others have this problem in Opera 8, it might > just be my machine which has a problem with the DPI. Hi Christian, Your machine is fine. Opera renders the exact same thing as IE does, the difference is that I was able to use a Conditional Comment to take care of that "shift" in IE (I just won't make the extra effort for Opera). > I should also mention that these drop-shadows make me sick to my > stomach. I think it is because they do not look realistic but (I > presume unintentionally) create a sort of optical-illusion. The boxes > look flat but they have a shadow that appears curved. I would go for > some more traditional drop-shadows. The "effect" I was after is that the 2 bottom corners look like they are "up"; but mostly I was testing a DOM solution to keep the markup clean. Thanks, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
Pete Mawhinney wrote: > The top 2 boxes appear to have a 1 px whitespace between the bottom > border and the drop shadow in Firefox 1.0.7 Win XP Pro. The bottom 2 > boxes are fine. All boxes look fine in IE 6.0.29 Thanks Pete, It looks fine in FF 1.5, but I just checked in FF 0.8 and I can see what you're describing. I can't find a way to fix it though :-( Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
The top 2 boxes appear to have a 1 px whitespace between the bottom border and the drop shadow in Firefox 1.0.7 Win XP Pro. The bottom 2 boxes are fine. All boxes look fine in IE 6.0.29 -Pete On 4/11/06, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The careers section is an iFrame (not much I can do here) and there is no > validation script on the forms yet. > The stylesheet switcher will be replaced so the banner won't "jump" on page > load. > > I'm particularly interested in the "behavior" of the boxes with drop shadow > on the home page across browsers. > http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/roel/ > > Thanks, > Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com > > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Check: SAPheadhunter
On 4/10/06, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm particularly interested in the "behavior" of the boxes with drop shadow > on the home page across browsers. > http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/roel/ They look fine in FF 1.5 Win but they are off to the right in Opera 8 Win. I don't know if others have this problem in Opera 8, it might just be my machine which has a problem with the DPI. I should also mention that these drop-shadows make me sick to my stomach. I think it is because they do not look realistic but (I presume unintentionally) create a sort of optical-illusion. The boxes look flat but they have a shadow that appears curved. I would go for some more traditional drop-shadows. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
