Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

2018-03-05 Thread Brian Cain via lldb-dev 
Ok, yes, you're right -- thanks for clarification.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld  wrote:

> libc++.so should be a linker script that automatically pulls in libc++abi
> (see "Failed to read file header" in your output). And IIRC libc++abi is
> only one possible implementation that may be used by libc++, but I'm no
> expert here...
>
>
> Am 2018-03-05 17:33, schrieb Brian Cain:
>
>> Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld 
>> wrote:
>>
>> From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime
>>> libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think
>>> they don't have a dependency on other libraries in that directory,
>>> so what would be the advantage of having RPATH set on them?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jonas
>>>
>>> Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev:
>>>
>>> It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration
>>> isn't
>>> uniform among the libraries produced by the release.  Some use
>>> $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none.  Is this by design?  It seems
>>> like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same
>>> way.
>>> If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.
>>>
>>> $ for f in
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do
>>> echo
>>> $f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1
>>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
>>> readelf: Error:
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so:
>>> Failed
>>> to read file header
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so
>>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb
>> IntelFeatures.so
>>
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb
>> IntelFeatures.so.6
>>
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb
>> IntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
>>
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
>>
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
>>> 0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so
>>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libompt
>> arget.rtl.x86_64.so
>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1
>>>
>>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.
>>>
>>> 4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1
>>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
>>> 360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094
>>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
>>> ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd
>>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>>>

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

2018-03-05 Thread Brian Cain via lldb-dev 
Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld  wrote:

> From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime
> libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think they don't
> have a dependency on other libraries in that directory, so what would be
> the advantage of having RPATH set on them?
>
> Regards,
> Jonas
>
>
> Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev:
>
>> It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration isn't
>> uniform among the libraries produced by the release.  Some use
>> $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none.  Is this by design?  It seems
>> like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same way.
>> If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.
>>
>> $ for f in
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do echo
>> $f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
>> readelf: Error:
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so: Failed
>> to read file header
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb
>> IntelFeatures.so
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb
>> IntelFeatures.so.6
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb
>> IntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
>>  0x001d (RUNPATH)Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libompt
>> arget.rtl.x86_64.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.
>>>
>>> 4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1
>>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
>>> 360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094
>>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
>>> ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd
>>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear testers,

 The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch
 after
 r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and
 one
 small x86 fix (r326393).

 Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

 For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but
 it
 will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published
 on
 the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is
 ready.