[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33941] New: utils/lit/tests/max-failures.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33941

Bug ID: 33941
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/max-failures.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/max-failures.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33944] New: utils/lit/tests/shtest-timeout.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33944

Bug ID: 33944
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/shtest-timeout.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/shtest-timeout.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33942] New: utils/lit/tests/unit/TestRunner.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33942

Bug ID: 33942
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/unit/TestRunner.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/unit/TestRunner.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33940] New: utils/lit/tests/shtest-shell.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33940

Bug ID: 33940
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/shtest-shell.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/shtest-shell.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33943] New: utils/lit/tests/unittest-adaptor.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33943

Bug ID: 33943
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/unittest-adaptor.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/unittest-adaptor.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33938] New: utils/lit/tests/shtest-output-printing.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33938

Bug ID: 33938
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/shtest-output-printing.py fails on
Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/shtest-output-printing.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33939] New: utils/lit/tests/shtest-format.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33939

Bug ID: 33939
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/shtest-format.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/shtest-format.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33935] New: utils/lit/tests/googletest-upstream-format.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33935

Bug ID: 33935
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/googletest-upstream-format.py fails on
Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/googletest-upstream-format.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33937] New: utils/lit/tests/selecting.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33937

Bug ID: 33937
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/selecting.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/selecting.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33933] New: utils/lit/tests/googletest-format.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33933

Bug ID: 33933
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/googletest-format.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/googletest-format.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33936] New: utils/lit/tests/shtest-encoding.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33936

Bug ID: 33936
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/shtest-encoding.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/shtest-encoding.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33934] New: utils/lit/tests/googletest-timeout.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33934

Bug ID: 33934
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/googletest-timeout.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/googletest-timeout.py fails.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33932] New: utils/lit/tests/discovery.py fails on Windows

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33932

Bug ID: 33932
   Summary: utils/lit/tests/discovery.py fails on Windows
   Product: Test Suite
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: lit
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: modoca...@gmail.com
CC: dan...@zuster.org, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

As described in utils/lit/README.txt, lit has its own test suite, which can be
run like so:

```
# From within your LLVM source directory.
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```

However, when this command is run on a Windows host, the test
utils/lit/tests/discovery.py fails. Here's its output:
https://gist.github.com/modocache/e5a5d22d6a7f3c401c378c0cbe77544e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33908] clang now depends on libxml2, apparently accidentally

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33908

Eric Beckmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Eric Beckmann  ---
r309070

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33931] New: Static variable in inline function having duplicates with shared library (compiled with GCC)

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33931

Bug ID: 33931
   Summary: Static variable in inline function having duplicates
with shared library (compiled with GCC)
   Product: clang
   Version: 3.9
  Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P
 Component: C++
  Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: mikebentle...@gmail.com
CC: dgre...@apple.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Created attachment 18847
  --> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=18847&action=edit
minimal reproducible example

This is a strange use case, but it is my use case.

Suppose you have an inline function with a static variable, such as

inline std::map& get_tests() {
  static std::map tests;
  return tests;
}

that is defined in a header file for a shared library.  Seems reasonable,
right?  Now suppose the shared library is compiled with GCC 5.4.0, also
reasonable.  Then you create an application that uses this inline function and
compile your application with Clang.  What happens is that the shared library,
when it calls this function, will have one copy of the static variable
different from the one in the application.

I have attached code that can duplicate this problem.  This has been tested
with GCC 5.4.0 (and a little with GCC 6.1).  I notice that this problem is NOT
there with GCC 4.9.  So, I actually do not know if this is a Clang bug or a GCC
bug.

In the example code, I demonstrate that everything is okay when using a static
integer, but it fails when using a static map.  I don't know what other kinds
of objects would have this problem.

Tested with the following versions of Clang:
- 3.9.0 final release
- 3.9.1 final release
- 4.0.0 final release
- 4.0.1 final release
- 5.0.0
  - This is the one I have installed from building cling
  - http://root.cern.ch/git/clang.git 1f8b137c7eb06ed8e321649ef7e3f3e7a96f361c
  - http://root.cern.ch/git/llvm.git 2a34248cb945d63ded5ee55128e68efd7e5b87c8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33825] clang boostrap fails at link time with TLS errors

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33825

Fedor Sergeev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Fedor Sergeev  ---
Fixed with:
  rL308978: [Sparc] invalid adjustments in TLS_LE/TLS_LDO relocations removed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33930] New: Assertion `OpN.isUniqued() && "Only uniqued operands cannot be mapped immediately"' failed.

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33930

Bug ID: 33930
   Summary: Assertion `OpN.isUniqued() && "Only uniqued operands
cannot be mapped immediately"' failed.
   Product: libraries
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: Transformation Utilities
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: paul_robin...@playstation.sony.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Created attachment 18845
  --> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=18845&action=edit
repro script

Crashes with trunk r308954.  Okay with 4.0, haven't tried 5.0.

$ cat bz181281.cpp
struct Alpha {
  virtual void bravo(...);
};
struct Charlie {
  virtual ~Charlie() {}
};
struct CharlieImpl : Charlie, Alpha {
  void bravo(...) {}
} delta;

$ clang -c -g bz181281.cpp
clang-5.0:
/home/probinson/projects/llvm-org/trunk/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.cpp:640:
llvm::MDNode*
{anonymous}::MDNodeMapper::visitOperands({anonymous}::MDNodeMapper::UniquedGraph&,
const llvm::MDOperand*&, llvm::MDNode::op_iterator, bool&): Assertion
`OpN.isUniqued() && "Only uniqued operands cannot be mapped immediately"'
failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33849] [meta] 5.0.0 Release Blockers

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33849
Bug 33849 depends on bug 33881, which changed state.

Bug 33881 Summary: ubsan: Program instrumented with -fsanitize=vptr may crash
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33881

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33881] ubsan: Program instrumented with -fsanitize=vptr may crash

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33881

Vedant Kumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Vedant Kumar  ---
Fixes landed in:
clang/r309007
compiler-rt/r309008

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33929] New: -Wcast-qual should not warn about dropping 'const' when casting to ObjC types

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33929

Bug ID: 33929
   Summary: -Wcast-qual should not warn about dropping 'const'
when casting to ObjC types
   Product: clang
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: All
OS: MacOS X
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P
 Component: Frontend
  Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: jordan_r...@apple.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

// clang -fsyntax-only -x objective-c -Weverything -
id reinterpretAsObject(const void *ptr) {
  return (id)ptr;
}

:2:14: warning: cast from 'const void *' to 'id' drops const qualifier
  [-Wcast-qual]
  return (id)ptr;
 ^

...however, there's no way to avoid this warning; you can't const-qualify
Objective-C object types inside the pointer. It might have been better if this
weren't a common idiom on Apple platforms, but it is---both 'const void *' and
opaque pointers to const struct types are sometimes valid Objective-C objects,
and casts to 'id', 'Class', or concrete object pointer types like 'NSString *'
are considered common and acceptable.

(If we /were/ to start warning on these all the time, they should be silenced
by adding '__bridge', and the warning should have a fix-it. But even that's
probably too much churn for Apple platforms.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33925] lld incorrectly creates manifest files by default

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33925

Nico Weber  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Nico Weber  ---
r308998

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33802] Address of _DYNAMIC symbol is incorrect when creating a shared object

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33802

Rafael Ávila de Espíndola  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INVALID
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33928] New: After r308791 there are numerous est case failures in bootstrap build

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33928

Bug ID: 33928
   Summary: After r308791 there are numerous est case failures in
bootstrap build
   Product: new-bugs
   Version: trunk
  Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: new bugs
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

You can see the failures here in the buildbot results:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/3289

Failures were occurring earlier but were masked by a compilation problem
introduced by an even earlier revision.


Failing Tests (9):
Clang :: CodeGen/avx512-reduceIntrin.c
Clang :: CodeGen/avx512-reduceMinMaxIntrin.c
Clang :: CodeGen/avx512f-builtins.c
Clang :: CodeGen/vector-alignment.c
Clang :: CodeGen/x86-inline-asm-v-constraint.c
Clang :: CodeGen/x86_64-arguments.c
Clang :: OpenMP/simd_metadata.c
Clang :: Preprocessor/predefined-arch-macros.c
Clang :: Preprocessor/x86_target_features.c

  Expected Passes: 33554
  Expected Failures  : 178
  Unsupported Tests  : 938
  Unexpected Failures: 9


Some of the details:

FAIL: Clang :: CodeGen/avx512-reduceMinMaxIntrin.c (5240 of 34679)
 TEST 'Clang :: CodeGen/avx512-reduceMinMaxIntrin.c' FAILED

Script:
--
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/lib/clang/6.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc
-ffreestanding
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/avx512-reduceMinMaxIntrin.c
-O2 -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin -target-cpu skylake-avx512 -emit-llvm -o -
-Wall -Werror |/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/opt -instnamer -S
|/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/FileCheck
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/avx512-reduceMinMaxIntrin.c
--
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/avx512-reduceMinMaxIntrin.c:9:12:
error: expected string not found in input
 // CHECK: %tmp = icmp slt <8 x i64> %shuffle1.i, %__W
   ^
:11:2: note: scanning from here
 %tmp = icmp sgt <8 x i64> %__W, %shuffle1.i
 ^

--



 TEST 'Clang :: CodeGen/vector-alignment.c' FAILED

Script:
--
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/lib/clang/6.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -w
-triple x86_64-apple-darwin10   -emit-llvm -o -
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c |
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/FileCheck
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SSE
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/lib/clang/6.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -w
-triple   i386-apple-darwin10   -emit-llvm -o -
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c |
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/FileCheck
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SSE
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/lib/clang/6.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -w
-triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -target-feature +avx   -emit-llvm -o -
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c |
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/FileCheck
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=AVX
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/lib/clang/6.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -w
-triple   i386-apple-darwin10 -target-feature +avx   -emit-llvm -o -
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c |
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/FileCheck
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=AVX
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/lib/clang/6.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -w
-triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -target-feature +avx512f   -emit-llvm -o -
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c |
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/FileCheck
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=AVX512
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/lib/clang/6.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -w
-triple   i386-apple-darwin10 -target-feature +avx512f   -emit-llvm -o -
/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/vector-alignment.c |
/home/seurer/llvm

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33926] attribute declaration must precede definition

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33926

zahira.ammarguel...@intel.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from zahira.ammarguel...@intel.com ---
Closed as this is not a bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33927] New: ISL object leak in DependenceInfo

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33927

Bug ID: 33927
   Summary: ISL object leak in DependenceInfo
   Product: Polly
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: isl
  Assignee: polly-...@googlegroups.com
  Reporter: l...@meinersbur.de
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Created attachment 18844
  --> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=18844&action=edit
erc_do_i_0.ll

The attached test case leaks an isl_space. This has likely to to with the
max-operations counter exceeding in the middle of the dependency computation.

$ opt -polly-opt-isl erc_do_i_0.ll
WARNING: You're attempting to print out a bitcode file.
This is inadvisable as it may cause display problems. If
you REALLY want to taste LLVM bitcode first-hand, you
can force output with the `-f' option.

/root/src/llvm/tools/polly/lib/External/isl/isl_ctx.c:253: isl_ctx freed, but
some objects still reference it



Valgrind report:
==32305== 24,118 (56 direct, 24,062 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 48 of 50
==32305==at 0x6144B55: calloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==32305==by 0x3378031: isl_calloc_or_die (isl_ctx.c:75)
==32305==by 0x33A46D8: isl_map_alloc_space (isl_map.c:5921)
==32305==by 0x33A49B2: isl_map_empty (isl_map.c:6009)
==32305==by 0x332FE48: isl_map_from_pw_multi_aff (isl_aff.c:4392)
==32305==by 0x33A7122: isl_map_partial_lexopt_aligned (isl_map.c:6808)
==32305==by 0x33A6EAD: isl_map_partial_lexopt (isl_map_lexopt_templ.c:182)
==32305==by 0x33A7182: isl_map_partial_lexmax (isl_map.c:6821)
==32305==by 0x337BBC2: restricted_partial_lexmax (isl_flow.c:589)
==32305==by 0x337BEBC: last_source (isl_flow.c:650)
==32305==by 0x337D567: compute_val_based_dependences (isl_flow.c:1189)
==32305==by 0x337DC61: access_info_compute_flow_core (isl_flow.c:1308)
==32305==by 0x3380B52: compute_single_flow (isl_flow.c:3050)
==32305==by 0x3380E61: compute_flow_schedule (isl_flow.c:3134)
==32305==by 0x3380F64: isl_union_access_info_compute_flow (isl_flow.c:3185)
==32305==by 0x2C1A220: buildFlow(isl_union_map*, isl_union_map*,
isl_union_map*, isl_schedule*) (DependenceInfo.cpp:297)
==32305==by 0x2C1A2D5: buildWAR(isl_union_map*, isl_union_map*,
isl_union_map*, isl_schedule*) (DependenceInfo.cpp:372)
==32305==by 0x2C1A9F0:
polly::Dependences::calculateDependences(polly::Scop&) (DependenceInfo.cpp:542)
==32305==by 0x2C1C65D:
polly::DependenceInfo::recomputeDependences(polly::Dependences::AnalysisLevel)
(DependenceInfo.cpp:967)
==32305==by 0x2C1C5C2:
polly::DependenceInfo::getDependences(polly::Dependences::AnalysisLevel)
(DependenceInfo.cpp:961)
==32305==by 0x2BF24FF: (anonymous
namespace)::IslScheduleOptimizer::runOnScop(polly::Scop&)
(ScheduleOptimizer.cpp:1460)
==32305==by 0x2CC59F0: polly::ScopPass::runOnRegion(llvm::Region*,
llvm::RGPassManager&) (ScopPass.cpp:29)
==32305==by 0x1AB12AD: llvm::RGPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
(RegionPass.cpp:98)
==32305==by 0x21BB035: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
(LegacyPassManager.cpp:1514)
==32305==by 0x21BB1CE: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
(LegacyPassManager.cpp:1535)
==32305==by 0x21BB549: (anonymous
namespace)::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
(LegacyPassManager.cpp:1591)
==32305==by 0x21BBC5E: llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
(LegacyPassManager.cpp:1694)
==32305==by 0x21BBE6A: llvm::legacy::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&)
(LegacyPassManager.cpp:1725)
==32305==by 0x141C491: main (opt.cpp:756)



Valgrind report (without refcounting):

==31878== 14,776 (80 direct, 14,696 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 29 of 31
==31878==at 0x6142B8F: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==31878==by 0x3377FCC: isl_malloc_or_die (isl_ctx.c:65)
==31878==by 0x341D9EC: isl_space_alloc (isl_space.c:32)
==31878==by 0x342080C: isl_space_join (isl_space.c:1206)
==31878==by 0x3420D7A: isl_space_range_product (isl_space.c:1322)
==31878==by 0x333B2CE: isl_multi_union_pw_aff_range_product_aligned
(isl_multi_templ.c:786)
==31878==by 0x333B25F: isl_multi_union_pw_aff_align_params_multi_multi_and
(isl_multi_templ.c:763)
==31878==by 0x333B402: isl_multi_union_pw_aff_range_product
(isl_multi_templ.c:818)
==31878==by 0x333B7C2: isl_multi_union_pw_aff_flat_range_product
(isl_multi_templ.c:989)
==31878==by 0x33FC56E: collect_filter_prefix_update
(isl_schedule_node.c:563)
==31878==by 0x33FC6FB: collect_filter_prefix (isl_schedule_node.c:634)
==31878==by 0x33FCABA: isl_schedule_node_get_prefix_schedule_relation
(isl_schedule_node.c:799)
==31878==by 0x33806F2: collect_sink_source (isl_flow.c:2887)
==31878== 

[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33926] New: attribute declaration must precede definition

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33926

Bug ID: 33926
   Summary: attribute declaration must precede definition
   Product: clang
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: Frontend
  Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: zahira.ammarguel...@intel.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

bash-4.2$ cat t3.c
extern __inline int foo (int __goo) {
  return __goo;
}
extern __typeof(foo) foo __asm__("");
bash-4.2$
bash-4.2$ gcc -v
gcc version 4.8.5 (GCC)
bash-4.2$
bash-4.2$ gcc -c t3.c
bash-4.2$

bash-4.2$ ../llorg_ws/builds/llorgefi2linux_debug/llvm/bin/clang -v
clang version 6.0.0 (cfe/trunk 308973)
bash-4.2$

bash-4.2$ clang -c -Xclang -ast-dump t3.c | grep foo
t3.c:4:34: warning: attribute declaration must precede definition
  [-Wignored-attributes]
extern __typeof(foo) foo __asm__("");
 ^
t3.c:1:21: note: previous definition is here
extern __inline int foo (int __goo) {
^
1 warning generated.
|-FunctionDecl 0xb5c40b0  line:1:21 referenced foo 'int
(int)' extern inline
`-FunctionDecl 0xb5c42e8 prev 0xb5c40b0  col:22 foo 'int
(int)' extern
bash-4.2$

gcc doesn't generate a warning. clang does. We can see that foo has 2 different
attributes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33925] New: lld incorrectly creates manifest files by default

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33925

Bug ID: 33925
   Summary: lld incorrectly creates manifest files by default
   Product: lld
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: COFF
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: nicolaswe...@gmx.de
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

C:\src\chrome\src>type test.cc
int main() {}

C:\src\chrome\src>cl /nologo /c test.cc
test.cc

C:\src\chrome\src>link.exe /nologo test.obj

C:\src\chrome\src>type test.exe.manifest
The system cannot find the file specified.

C:\src\chrome\src>"third_party\llvm-build\Release+Asserts\bin\lld-link.exe"
test.obj

C:\src\chrome\src>type test.exe.manifest


  

  
 
  

  




lld-link creates a .manifest file by default while link.exe doesn't (unless you
pass in /manifest). lld-link should match link.exe's behavior.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33924] New: Unexpected error "definition with same mangled name as another definition"

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33924

Bug ID: 33924
   Summary: Unexpected error "definition with same mangled name as
another definition"
   Product: clang
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P
 Component: Modules
  Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: pank...@gmail.com
CC: dgre...@apple.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Created attachment 18843
  --> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=18843&action=edit
Files that reproduce the error

It triggers on the following piece of code when we try to instantiate templated
function `format` in 2 separate modules:

// -- format.h
class Formatter {
public:
  template 
  void doFormat(T& out) {}
};

template 
void format(T t) {
  Formatter f;
  auto lambda = [] {};
  f.doFormat(lambda);
}

(see full set of files in attachment)
Error message:

In module 'foo1' imported from main.cpp:1:
In module 'format' imported from ./foo1.h:3:
./format.h:6:8: error: definition with same mangled name as another
definition
   void doFormat(T& out) {}
   ^
./format.h:6:8: note: previous definition is here

Seems like this is related to passing lambda from templated function. If I try
to call `doFormat` on regular class or move body of `format` into module `foo`
itself, then the error goes away.

Worth noting there is also assertion triggering when using clang built from
source in debug mode:

llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp:402: void llvm::Value::doRAUW(llvm::Value*, bool):
Assertion `New->getType() == getType(
) && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed.

Repro command line:
clang++ --std=c++14 -I .  -fmodules -fcxx-modules
-fmodules-cache-path=./modules_out/_module_cache -c main.cpp -o main.o


A non-modular compilation that uses the same set of files finishes fine.
Let me know if you need any extra information.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33923] New: getGlobalID() always returns 0

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923

Bug ID: 33923
   Summary: getGlobalID() always returns 0
   Product: clang
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: Macintosh
OS: MacOS X
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P
 Component: Frontend
  Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: m...@tiferrei.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Created attachment 18842
  --> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=18842&action=edit
Source file, output and test file

Hello there, 
I was trying to get some kind of ID for each node that Clang passes me, I
needed this to later detect if functions are repeatedly called, and I'd use the
ID to match functions.
So I decided to take a look at `getGlobalID()` (clang::Decl::getGlobalID) and
see if this would give me some unique identifiers. Oddly enough, this seems to
always return an ID of "0" for all functions. So after some googling I also
found this post:
http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Getting-the-unique-ID-for-a-clang-Decl-td4052968.html
which seems to get to this same conclusion.

I am a beginner in clang generally and so I don't know if this is just
something that I'm doing incorrectly or really a bug. I have attached the
specific source file and some example output.

PS: The ideal for me would be to actually get the hex code that is shown right
after each node's type (in "CompoundStmt 0x7f8c39807198 "
I'd like to get "0x7f8c39807198")

Thank you,
tiferrei

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33922] New: [OpenMP 5.0] New ident_t flags for __kmpc_for_static_init()

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33922

Bug ID: 33922
   Summary: [OpenMP 5.0] New ident_t flags for
__kmpc_for_static_init()
   Product: OpenMP
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P
 Component: Clang Compiler Support
  Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: olga.malysh...@intel.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

OpenMP 5.0 will include OpenMP Tools interface that requires distinguishing
different worksharing constructs. 
Since the same entry point (__kmp_for_static_init(ident_t *loc, kmp_int32
global_tid,)) is called in case static loop/sections/distribute it is
suggested using 'flags' field of the ident_t structure to pass the type of the
construct.

Please add the following flags and set them properly
OMP_IDENT_WORK_LOOP = 0x200 // static loop 
OMP_IDENT_WORK_SECTIONS = 0x400 //sections
OMP_IDENT_WORK_DISTRIBUTE = 0x800 //distribute

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33921] New: ARM NEON vectorization miscompiles code in 5.0

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33921

Bug ID: 33921
   Summary: ARM NEON vectorization miscompiles code in 5.0
   Product: libraries
   Version: 5.0
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: Backend: ARM
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: mar...@martin.st
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Starting with SVN r306803, some C code that wasn't vectorized before now is
vectorized. This seems to break e.g. some VP9 inverse transforms in libavcodec,
in code like this:

https://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=blob;f=libavcodec/vp9dsp.c;h=7f863943284b8970744c81b0b7d749e5c9cf8bdf;hb=2b1324bd167553f49736e4eaa94f96da9982925e#l947
with the idct8_1d and iadst8_1d functions. If this file is built with
-fno-tree-vectorize, the issue disappears.

This regressed when upgrading from SVN r305659 to the 5.0 branch point:
https://fate.libav.org/armv7-win32-clang-5.0

Bisecting this leads to SVN r306803. The same issue can also be reproduced when
targeting linux, not only windows. It should be reproducable by building libav
and running "make fate-checkasm-vp9dsp", which should pass unless this is
miscompiled.

I will dig into it further, hopefully soon, to fill in with a better
reproducable testcase of the issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33920] New: Backport SVN r308950 to 5.0

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33920

Bug ID: 33920
   Summary: Backport SVN r308950 to 5.0
   Product: libraries
   Version: 5.0
  Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P
 Component: Backend: AArch64
  Assignee: unassignedb...@nondot.org
  Reporter: mar...@martin.st
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Please backport r308950 ([AArch64] Reserve a 16 byte aligned amount of fixed
stack for win64 varargs) to 5.0. This fixes an issue with the new win/arm64
calling convention.

The support for targeting win/arm64 itself is still immature, but the calling
convention handling in itself should be mature enough, and can be used by Wine
for clang >= 5.0 if this is backported.

This carries no regression risk as it only touches code in new codepaths that
aren't used before.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33714] Size sanity check is pessimistic

2017-07-25 Thread via llvm-bugs
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33714

George Rimar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from George Rimar  ---
r308955

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs