Re: [lng-odp] Fedora repo changes

2016-05-16 Thread Anders Roxell
On 11 May 2016 at 21:53, Matt Spencer  wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Thought I would use some down time to have a play with ODP.  On a vanilla
> Fedora 23 Server install, there is an issue with the current odp.repo in
> that the default behaviour of ‘def’ is to gpg check the downloads.  So,
> following the instructions on the site fails on ‘dnf update’ as it reads the
> odp repo data.
>
> Can I make two suggestions please?
>
> 1, add the following to odp.repo
> enabled=1
> gpgcheck=0

Thank you, will look into that.

>
> 2, change the instructions from using ‘yum update’ to ‘dnf update’
>
> Also, there is no indication on the site that the RPM’s are arrch64 only.
> Should we be providing x86 binaries too?

This is something that we are working on already.

Cheers,
Anders
___
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp


[lng-odp] Fedora repo changes

2016-05-11 Thread Matt Spencer
Hi Guys

Thought I would use some down time to have a play with ODP.  On a vanilla 
Fedora 23 Server install, there is an issue with the current odp.repo in that 
the default behaviour of 'def' is to gpg check the downloads.  So, following 
the instructions on the site fails on 'dnf update' as it reads the odp repo 
data.

Can I make two suggestions please?

1, add the following to odp.repo
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0

2, change the instructions from using 'yum update' to 'dnf update'

Also, there is no indication on the site that the RPM's are arrch64 only.  
Should we be providing x86 binaries too?

Cheers

Matt
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
___
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp