On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Chris M. Thomasson <cris...@charter.net> wrote: > On Friday, February 15, 2013 at 1:16:36 AM UTC-8, Anthony Williams wrote: >> >> On 14/02/13 23:07, jseig...@gmail.com wrote: >> > C11 and C++11 left out the most powerful atomic primitives. Despite >> > that you can do some limited implementations though they're much more >> > complicated than they should be and a PITA to develop. >> >> I'd love to know what primitives you think we left out. Pretty much >> everything that was proposed for threading was included, and we're >> actively seeking proposals for C++14 and C++17, so a clear description >> of the desired facility could lead to it being in the next C++ standard. >> >> > Also not >> > helping, stdatomic.h seems to be missing from Ubuntu 12.10. I have no >> > idea where it is or when or if it will ever show up. >> >> I didn't think gcc was targetting C11. gcc 4.7 certainly has the >> <atomic> header from C++11. >> >> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/atomic-ptr-plus/files/stpc/ >> >> Interesting. I'll have to have a good look at this. > > > It seems that Joe Seigh's posts got deleted from this thread. Damnm, that is > a shame.
Humm... Maybe Joe deleted it himself? At least we have it in Anthony's reply. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Scalable Synchronization Algorithms" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lock-free+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lock-free/CAEeQi3vtQZoOfb5W%2B8iy2Srr5Pi5_Ka%3DvtDjjUoYxu0XGbNjeA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
