Re: RE: svn commit: r1617397 - /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java

2014-08-13 Thread Matt Sicker
On Wednesday, 13 August 2014, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:

 So are you going to change this back?

 Yeah I'll revert it unless someone else snags it first. I won't be at a
computer for several hours, though.

I would note that this is my relic of old Java development. Similar to the
calls of size()  0 instead of isEmpty() you still find all over the place.


 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','boa...@gmail.com'); wrote:

 Oh my bad, I mixed up lazy singleton and eager singleton.


 On 12 August 2014 17:43, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ralph.go...@dslextreme.com'); wrote:

 Finally, see
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern#Eager_initialization.
  This was the prior pattern which is clearly thread safe.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ralph.go...@dslextreme.com'); wrote:

 Let me put it another way.

 If your intent is that the factory should only be created when getManager
 is called vs when AbstractDataManager is loaded then your change is fine.
  However, I am not sure there is any benefit to that since I would expect
 every access to AbstractDataManager to be immediately followed by a call to
 getManager.

 From what I can see the previous code was not vulnerable to any race
 conditions.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ralph.go...@dslextreme.com'); wrote:

 So you are saying static initializers in a class can be executed multiple
 times?  If so I certainly wasn’t aware of that and I would think a few
 pieces of code would need modification.  Before I go searching can you
 point to something that says it works that way?

 When I read
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initialization-on-demand_holder_idiom it
 indicates that static initialization IS guaranteed to be serial, in which
 case the holder pattern is not needed for this.  That pattern is for when
 you want lazy initialization, not for guaranteeing a static variable is
 only initialized once.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ralph.go...@dslextreme.com'); wrote:

 What race condition?  Static variables are initialized when the class is
 constructed.  As far as I know there is no race condition on that or Java
 would be hosed.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','boa...@gmail.com'); wrote:

 Prevents multiple threads from constructing the field if they access the
 class concurrently. Basically, it prevents a race condition. The
 alternative is to make the field volatile and do a double-checked lock
 which we do in another class somewhere.


 On 12 August 2014 13:53, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','garydgreg...@gmail.com'); wrote:

 Hi,

 What is the justification for this extra level?

 Gary


  Original message 
 From: mattsic...@apache.org
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mattsic...@apache.org');
 Date:08/11/2014 22:04 (GMT-05:00)
 To: comm...@logging.apache.org
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','comm...@logging.apache.org');
 Subject: svn commit: r1617397 -
 /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java


 Author: mattsicker
 Date: Tue Aug 12 02:04:38 2014
 New Revision: 1617397

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617397
 Log:
 Singleton pattern

 Modified:

 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java

 Modified:
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 URL:
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java?rev=1617397r1=1617396r2=1617397view=diff

 ==
 ---
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 (original)
 +++
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 Tue Aug 12 02:04:38 2014
 @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ import org.apache.logging.log4j.core.uti
   * An {@link AbstractDatabaseManager} implementation for relational
 databases accessed via JDBC.
   */
 public final class JdbcDatabaseManager extends AbstractDatabaseManager {
 -private static final JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory FACTORY = new
 JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory();

  private final ListColumn columns;
  private final ConnectionSource connectionSource;
 @@ -174,10 +173,19 @@ public final class JdbcDatabaseManager e
  

Re: RE: svn commit: r1617397 - /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java

2014-08-13 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Wednesday, 13 August 2014, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 wrote:

 So are you going to change this back?

 Yeah I'll revert it unless someone else snags it first. I won't be at a
 computer for several hours, though.


Matt, please do undo when you do get a chance.

Gary


 I would note that this is my relic of old Java development. Similar to the
 calls of size()  0 instead of isEmpty() you still find all over the place.


 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oh my bad, I mixed up lazy singleton and eager singleton.


 On 12 August 2014 17:43, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:

 Finally, see
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern#Eager_initialization.
  This was the prior pattern which is clearly thread safe.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 wrote:

 Let me put it another way.

 If your intent is that the factory should only be created when
 getManager is called vs when AbstractDataManager is loaded then your change
 is fine.  However, I am not sure there is any benefit to that since I would
 expect every access to AbstractDataManager to be immediately followed by a
 call to getManager.

 From what I can see the previous code was not vulnerable to any race
 conditions.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 wrote:

 So you are saying static initializers in a class can be executed
 multiple times?  If so I certainly wasn’t aware of that and I would think a
 few pieces of code would need modification.  Before I go searching can you
 point to something that says it works that way?

 When I read
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initialization-on-demand_holder_idiom it
 indicates that static initialization IS guaranteed to be serial, in which
 case the holder pattern is not needed for this.  That pattern is for when
 you want lazy initialization, not for guaranteeing a static variable is
 only initialized once.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
 wrote:

 What race condition?  Static variables are initialized when the class is
 constructed.  As far as I know there is no race condition on that or Java
 would be hosed.

 Ralph

 On Aug 12, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Prevents multiple threads from constructing the field if they access the
 class concurrently. Basically, it prevents a race condition. The
 alternative is to make the field volatile and do a double-checked lock
 which we do in another class somewhere.


 On 12 August 2014 13:53, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 What is the justification for this extra level?

 Gary


  Original message 
 From: mattsic...@apache.org
 Date:08/11/2014 22:04 (GMT-05:00)
 To: comm...@logging.apache.org
 Subject: svn commit: r1617397 -
 /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java


 Author: mattsicker
 Date: Tue Aug 12 02:04:38 2014
 New Revision: 1617397

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617397
 Log:
 Singleton pattern

 Modified:

 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java

 Modified:
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 URL:
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java?rev=1617397r1=1617396r2=1617397view=diff

 ==
 ---
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 (original)
 +++
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 Tue Aug 12 02:04:38 2014
 @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ import org.apache.logging.log4j.core.uti
   * An {@link AbstractDatabaseManager} implementation for relational
 databases accessed via JDBC.
   */
 public final class JdbcDatabaseManager extends AbstractDatabaseManager {
 -private static final JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory FACTORY = new
 JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory();

  private final ListColumn columns;
  private final ConnectionSource connectionSource;
 @@ -174,10 +173,19 @@ public final class JdbcDatabaseManager e
   final
 ColumnConfig[] columnConfigs) {

  return AbstractDatabaseManager.getManager(
 -name, new FactoryData(bufferSize, connectionSource,
 tableName, columnConfigs), FACTORY
 +name, new FactoryData(bufferSize, connectionSource,
 tableName, columnConfigs), getFactory()
  );
  }

 +// the usual lazy singleton
 

Re: RE: svn commit: r1617397 - /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java

2014-08-12 Thread Matt Sicker
Prevents multiple threads from constructing the field if they access the
class concurrently. Basically, it prevents a race condition. The
alternative is to make the field volatile and do a double-checked lock
which we do in another class somewhere.


On 12 August 2014 13:53, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 What is the justification for this extra level?

 Gary


  Original message 
 From: mattsic...@apache.org
 Date:08/11/2014 22:04 (GMT-05:00)
 To: comm...@logging.apache.org
 Subject: svn commit: r1617397 -
 /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java


 Author: mattsicker
 Date: Tue Aug 12 02:04:38 2014
 New Revision: 1617397

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617397
 Log:
 Singleton pattern

 Modified:

 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java

 Modified:
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 URL:
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java?rev=1617397r1=1617396r2=1617397view=diff

 ==
 ---
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 (original)
 +++
 logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/db/jdbc/JdbcDatabaseManager.java
 Tue Aug 12 02:04:38 2014
 @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ import org.apache.logging.log4j.core.uti
   * An {@link AbstractDatabaseManager} implementation for relational
 databases accessed via JDBC.
   */
 public final class JdbcDatabaseManager extends AbstractDatabaseManager {
 -private static final JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory FACTORY = new
 JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory();

  private final ListColumn columns;
  private final ConnectionSource connectionSource;
 @@ -174,10 +173,19 @@ public final class JdbcDatabaseManager e
   final
 ColumnConfig[] columnConfigs) {

  return AbstractDatabaseManager.getManager(
 -name, new FactoryData(bufferSize, connectionSource,
 tableName, columnConfigs), FACTORY
 +name, new FactoryData(bufferSize, connectionSource,
 tableName, columnConfigs), getFactory()
  );
  }

 +// the usual lazy singleton
 +private static class Holder {
 +private static final JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory INSTANCE = new
 JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory();
 +}
 +
 +private static JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory getFactory() {
 +return Holder.INSTANCE;
 +}
 +
  /**
   * Encapsulates data that {@link JDBCDatabaseManagerFactory} uses to
 create managers.
   */





-- 
Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com