Re: Status of Log4J-implementation for other languages
Thanks. Does anybody have some experiences with these implementations ? On 2 Nov 2003 at 9:30, Scott Deboy wrote: See http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/download.html - ports to other languages Delphi: (log4D) http://codecentral.borland.com/codecentral/ccweb.exe/listing?id=3D16445 log4cxx (http://log4cxx.sourceforge.net/) provides a number of appenders, filters and layouts. log4perl (http://log4perl.sourceforge.net) also provides a similar set of capabilities. -Original Message- From: Matthias Petersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 10/31/2003 4:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:= Subject: Status of Log4J-implementation for other languages Hi, I saw in the documentation that Log4J was implemeted also in other programming languages. Can somebody give me further informations (like stability, compatiblity, ...) of implementations for - C++ - Perl - Delphi Thanks. Matthias -- Matthias Petersen ms management systems gmbh Krokamp 29 24539 Neum=FCnster Fon: +49. 4321. 9995-49 Fax: +49. 4321. 9995-41 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Petersen ms management systems gmbh Krokamp 29 24539 Neumünster Fon: +49. 4321. 9995-49 Fax: +49. 4321. 9995-41 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status of Log4J-implementation for other languages
Hi, I saw in the documentation that Log4J was implemeted also in other programming languages. Can somebody give me further informations (like stability, compatiblity, ...) of implementations for - C++ - Perl - Delphi Thanks. Matthias -- Matthias Petersen ms management systems gmbh Krokamp 29 24539 Neumünster Fon: +49. 4321. 9995-49 Fax: +49. 4321. 9995-41 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log4J vs. java.util.logging
Hi all, thanks a lot for your mails. It seems that Log4J is definitive the right choice. Bye Matthias -- Matthias Petersen ms management systems gmbh Krokamp 29 24539 Neumünster Fon: +49. 4321. 9995-49 Fax: +49. 4321. 9995-41 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Log4J vs. java.util.logging
Hi, I saw in the 1.4 JDK that there were new classes introduced concerning logging, which seems to be a base for Log4J. When I take a look at the class hierarchy of Log4J, it is not a subclass of those JDK logging classes (I think the reason is that Log4J is older than the 1.4 JDK...). So, what will happen with Log4J in the future ? Will it be a subclass of the Java 1.4 logging classes or will it go in a different direction ? I think that the Log4J classes are much better than the 1.4 Java classes, but what will happen if those Java classes will become the standard for logging ? Or will Log4J be a part of the JDK somewhere in the future ? Your answers are very important for me, because I have to decide if my company is using Log4J or if we need to enhance the 1.4 JDK logging classes. Thanks Matthias -- Matthias Petersen ms management systems gmbh Krokamp 29 24539 Neumünster Fon: +49. 4321. 9995-49 Fax: +49. 4321. 9995-41 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
