On 2015-09-17, Gary Gregory wrote:
> "Patches welcome" is my motto :-)
> Gary
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>> Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists.
>> I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)? Is it because
>> there is less development work being done on log4net and log4j had
>> significant changes in the 2.0 version?
> I think I read somewhere that log4net was a port of log4j 1.
This is certainly part of the reason. log4net was started as a port of
1.x a long time ago. The developers (long before I joined) added some
deviations that look closer to what log4j 2 is doing (XML
configuration).
Incidently Dominik started a discussion about log4net 2.0 on the dev
list[1] and some people expressed interest. Any hand that can offer
some help is more than welcome, so please come over and join.
[1] thread starting with
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4net-dev/201508.mbox/%3C03be01d0da4f%24a85aaa10%24f90ffe30%24%40apache.org%3E
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org