RE: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon seperated...

2008-08-28 Thread Gert Driesen
Ron,

 

I wanted to post this after I saw your commit, but I forgot.

 

I don't think we should confront users of log4net with our internal changes,
and hereby force them to have different config files for .NET 1.x and .NET
2.0.

 

Instead, I think we should convert from semi-colon to comma separated email
addresses ourselves when approprioate.

 

What do you think?

 

Gert

 

From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: donderdag 28 augustus 2008 0:04
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon
seperated...

 

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-128

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4net/trunk/src/Appender/SmtpAppender
.cs?r1=688413r2=688416diff_format=h

- Original Message 
From: Walden H. Leverich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4NET User log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:05:08 PM
Subject: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon
seperated...

Am I nuts, or must multiple addresses in the To of the SmtpAppender be COMMA
separated, not semicolon separated as the documentation says?

 

-Walden

 

--

Walden H Leverich III

Tech Software

(516) 627-3800 x3051

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ 

 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.

(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

 



RE: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon seperated...

2008-08-28 Thread Walden H. Leverich
 I agree. I'll update the code.

 

For those of use that spelunked the code w/reflector (or looked at the source) 
and now use commas, might I suggest you support both.

 

-Walden

 

--

Walden H Leverich III

Tech Software

(516) 627-3800 x3051

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ 

 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.

(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

 

From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 7:24 AM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon 
seperated...

 

I agree. I'll update the code.

 

- Original Message 
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4NET User log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 7:17:25 AM
Subject: RE: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon 
seperated...

Ron,

 

I wanted to post this after I saw your commit, but I forgot.

 

I don’t think we should confront users of log4net with our internal changes, 
and hereby force them to have different config files for .NET 1.x and .NET 2.0.

 

Instead, I think we should convert from semi-colon to comma separated email 
addresses ourselves when approprioate.

 

What do you think?

 

Gert

 

From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: donderdag 28 augustus 2008 0:04
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon 
seperated...

 

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-128

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4net/trunk/src/Appender/SmtpAppender.cs?r1=688413r2=688416diff_format=h

- Original Message 
From: Walden H. Leverich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4NET User log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:05:08 PM
Subject: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon 
seperated...

Am I nuts, or must multiple addresses in the To of the SmtpAppender be COMMA 
separated, not semicolon separated as the documentation says?

 

-Walden

 

--

Walden H Leverich III

Tech Software

(516) 627-3800 x3051

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ 

 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.

(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

 



Whatever happened to asp.net pattern converters?

2008-08-28 Thread Jon Sheldon
Hello,

I'm very interested in using log4net as my companies standard logging utility.  
Since our focus is primarily on developing web applications using asp.net, I'm 
very interested in the AspNet*PatternConverter classes that Ron started to 
implement back in October 2006.  Is there a new release of log4net that is 
coming out soon that will include them?

Or should I create my own layout class that implements ILayout and similar 
asp.net httpcontext focused PatternConverter classes?

Thanks.

Jon

jon scott-sheldon
senior internet applications architect
mcp

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
860.679.9332  x 318
acsysinteractive.com

acsysinteractive
connecticut  |  new york



Re: Whatever happened to asp.net pattern converters?

2008-08-28 Thread Ron Grabowski
I'm still working on them. What functionality are you looking at using?



- Original Message 
From: Jon Sheldon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:07:28 PM
Subject: Whatever happened to asp.net pattern converters?

 
Hello, 
 
I’m
very interested in using log4net as my companies standard logging utility. 
Since our focus is primarily on developing web applications using asp.net, I’m
very interested in the AspNet*PatternConverter classes that Ron started to
implement back in October 2006.  Is there a new release of log4net that is
coming out soon that will include them?
 
Or
should I create my own layout class that implements ILayout and similar asp.net
httpcontext focused PatternConverter classes?
 
Thanks.
 
Jon
 
jon scott-sheldon
senior internet applications
architect 
mcp

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
860.679.9332  x 318
acsysinteractive.com

acsysinteractive
connecticut  |  new york

RE: Whatever happened to asp.net pattern converters?

2008-08-28 Thread Jon Sheldon
I think I've got an approach.  I'm going to implement my own converter classes, 
and then just include them in the config file as part of the layout declaration.

I'm pretty new to log4net, but does that sound like a reasonable approach?

Jon
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:30 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Whatever happened to asp.net pattern converters?

I'm still working on them. What functionality are you looking at using?

- Original Message 
From: Jon Sheldon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:07:28 PM
Subject: Whatever happened to asp.net pattern converters?
Hello,

I’m very interested in using log4net as my companies standard logging utility.  
Since our focus is primarily on developing web applications using asp.net, I’m 
very interested in the AspNet*PatternConverter classes that Ron started to 
implement back in October 2006.  Is there a new release of log4net that is 
coming out soon that will include them?

Or should I create my own layout class that implements ILayout and similar 
asp.net httpcontext focused PatternConverter classes?

Thanks.

Jon

jon scott-sheldon
senior internet applications architect
mcp

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
860.679.9332  x 318
acsysinteractive.com

acsysinteractive
connecticut  |  new york



Persisting configuration changes?

2008-08-28 Thread Roy Chastain
I found an archived post (from 2006) in which Nicko states that log4Net
does not provide any method of persisting dynamic configuration changes.

Has anyone written any code to persist configuration changes that they
would be willing to share or at least talk about?

Thanks


--
Roy Chastain