Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
amusing: http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm -- Robin Szemeti The box said "requires windows 95 or better" So I installed Linux!
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
At 09:19 PM 2001.04.26 +0100, you wrote: >amusing: > >http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm Cousin site to http://www.c-cup.com/, which seems to be down at the moment. Typical example: "Charisma Carpenter Guide to Selected Linux Software" http://www.c-cup.com/linux/software-that-works.html (http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.c-cup.com/linux/software-that-works.html) -- Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
Have a look at her right big toe in this, has someone doctored the photo? http://britneyspears.ac/bs/024b.jpg -- Robert - Original Message - From: "Robin Szemeti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 26 April 2001 21:19 Subject: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this > amusing: > > http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm > > -- > Robin Szemeti > > The box said "requires windows 95 or better" > So I installed Linux! > >
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:39:18AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote: > Have a look at her right big toe in this, has someone doctored the photo? > > http://britneyspears.ac/bs/024b.jpg I read press releases that explicitly denied all rumors of any surgical enhancements to Britney's anatomy. HTH :) Paul
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
Chris Devers writes: > Cousin site to http://www.c-cup.com/, which seems to be down at the moment. > > Typical example: "Charisma Carpenter Guide to Selected Linux Software" > http://www.c-cup.com/linux/software-that-works.html > (http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.c-cup.com/linux/software-that-works.html) On the subject of C.C., let me just say that last night's Angel had her in a bikini for an exploitative commercial she was in. Aie caramba! Nat
RE: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
From: Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:36 AM > Chris Devers writes: > > Cousin site to http://www.c-cup.com/, which seems to be down at the moment. > > > > Typical example: "Charisma Carpenter Guide to Selected Linux Software" > > http://www.c-cup.com/linux/software-that-works.html > > (http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.c-cup.com/linux/software-that-work s.html) > > On the subject of C.C., let me just say that last night's Angel had > her in a bikini for an exploitative commercial she was in. > > Aie caramba! For those of you following on Sky One, remember that you're only ten days behind the US right now - so that episode will be shown a week on Friday. For those of you following on terrestial TV - $deity knows where or when Angel series 2 will be shown. Dave... -- The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:35:42PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > On the subject of C.C., let me just say that last night's Angel had > her in a bikini for an exploitative commercial she was in. You do realise that i have to wait for over six months to see this don't you. Bastard. :) Dean -- Profanity is the one language all programmers understand --- Anon
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:14:18AM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote: >> Cousin site to http://www.c-cup.com/, which seems to be down at the moment. It looks like its still down and the Google cache lacks images :( > Typical example: "Charisma Carpenter Guide to Selected Linux Software" > For those of you following on Sky One, remember that you're only ten days > behind the US right now - so that episode will be shown a week on Friday. Now who do i know with Sky ;) > For those of you following on terrestial TV - $deity knows where or when > Angel series 2 will be shown. That would be me. Looks like the videos will be out before the show comes on. Dean -- Profanity is the one language all programmers understand --- Anon
RE: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
On 03/05/2001 at 09:14 +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote: >> On the subject of C.C., let me just say that last night's Angel had >> her in a bikini for an exploitative commercial she was in. > >For those of you following on Sky One, remember that you're only ten days >behind the US right now - so that episode will be shown a week on Friday. Yes, I finally found out that new Buffy and Angel are shown on Tuesday nights in the US, the one day of the week we weren't there. (On that subject, thanks to David Adler for the hospitality, and to Lucille for all the organisation, and to NY for being big and not too scary, and to the other London.pm-ers who made it over so I wasn't freaked out by exploring something on my own.) I'll try to sort out photos (although I didn't take any at NY.pm) and some sort of documentary web page, for anyone who cares, at some point in the next, sigh, four weeks? Unlike celia, who's got some up anyway (and they're probably better too: http://shadowgirl.net/photos/NYC-apr-2001/). -- :: paul :: how fickle fate can be
RE: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
From: Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:43 PM > I'll try to sort out photos (although I didn't take any at NY.pm) and > some sort of documentary web page, for anyone who cares, at some point > in the next, sigh, four weeks? Unlike celia, who's got some up anyway > (and they're probably better too: > http://shadowgirl.net/photos/NYC-apr-2001/). I deliberately didn't take my camera to ny.pm either - assuming (wrongly) that someone else would do it. I'll get my photos up before too long. But I do need to get them developed the old fashioned way, so if anyone wants to prevent photos taken on the Staten Island Ferry from being published then they still have a few days to approach me with an appropriate bribe. Dave... -- The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
Cross David - dcross wrote: > I'll get my photos up before too long. But I do need to get them developed > the old fashioned way, so if anyone wants to prevent photos taken on the > Staten Island Ferry from being published then they still have a few days to > approach me with an appropriate bribe. Well I could mention that you were a big jessie on the roller coaster at Coney Island ... except that I've jsut done that. Ah. ... Have I ever mentioned that I really like you and have always respected and admired you?
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll try to sort out photos (although I didn't take any at NY.pm) and > some sort of documentary web page, for anyone who cares, at some point > in the next, sigh, four weeks? Unlike celia, who's got some up anyway > (and they're probably better too: > http://shadowgirl.net/photos/NYC-apr-2001/). There's only one 't' in Staten. -- Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
RE: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
From: Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 3:47 PM > Cross David - dcross wrote: > > > I'll get my photos up before too long. But I do need to get them developed > > the old fashioned way, so if anyone wants to prevent photos taken on the > > Staten Island Ferry from being published then they still have a few days to > > approach me with an appropriate bribe. > > Well I could mention that you were a big jessie on the roller coaster at > Coney Island ... except that I've jsut done that. Ah. At least _I_ was on the roller coaster at Coney Island - unlike some people I could mention. And I'm hoping that Gill has the photo to prove it :) > Have I ever mentioned that I really like you and have always respected > and admired you? Heh! That's more like it :) Dave... -- The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
Cross David - dcross wrote: > At least _I_ was on the roller coaster at Coney Island - unlike some people > I could mention. And I'm hoping that Gill has the photo to prove it :) I'd have been on it too if I hadn't needed to go back to Manhattan. Gah, publish and be damned Cross.
Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:42:40PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote: > http://shadowgirl.net/photos/NYC-apr-2001/). Those are great pictures! http://shadowgirl.net/photos/NYC-apr-2001/merkin.html I trust everyone knows what a merkin *really* is... Paul "can you tell I live near SF?" M
