On 11 Dec 2011, at 20:46, David Cantrell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 05:23:40PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
On 9 Dec 2011, at 13:16, David Cantrell wrote:
This idea that with the right magic pixie dust teleworking can be made
to work regardless of the company, the colleagues, and the employee is a
nice idea, but I have seen no evidence whatsoever that it is true.
A whole bunch of CSCW and social science folk have looked at how teams
produce work, and distributed teams come out worse and so called radically
colocated teams come out best (war room type setups where everybody on a
project in in the same room).
Of course, if your people are made of pure Awesomium then you might be OK
with taking that performance hit because you're still coming out ahead
despite your people being in Narsarsuaq and Tataouine compared to if
you'd employed less awesome people happy to work with you in a damp
basement in Preston.
Of course ;)
Although it might be worth considering how much _more_ productive you might be
if they were all in the same room (I've know a couple of orgs who fly folk
together for a month - paying hotel, etc. - because it's _worth_ it).
Telecommuting also wins against folk who have terrible work environments (the
stereotypical noisy half-cube farm for example).
Cheers,
Adrian
--
http://quietstars.com adri...@quietstars.com twitter.com/adrianh
t. +44 (0)7752 419080 skype adrianjohnhoward del.icio.us/adrianh