Re: New perl features?
On 03/15/2013 10:40 PM, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: ~~ and //= are the only new sigils I don't think 'sigils' means what you seem to think it means :-) -- Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk http://dave.org.uk/ @davorg
Re: New perl features?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:40:53PM +, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: On 15 Mar 2013, at 18:31, Mike Stok m...@stok.ca wrote: Even if it wasn't ... the question I try to ask is How can I make it easier to deploy my app? rather than What must I do to fit into your infrastructure?. Not what I was asking. That doesn't matter. Mike described the question he tries to ask and considered an answer to that question. This list allows us to discuss things that interest us and explore ideas related to the original question, even if they don't address that question directly. Tom
Re: New perl features?
On 16 Mar 2013, at 08:31, Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote: On 03/15/2013 10:40 PM, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: ~~ and //= are the only new sigils I don't think 'sigils' means what you seem to think it means :-) Line noise?
Re: New perl features?
On 16 Mar 2013, at 09:09, Tom Hukins t...@eborcom.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:40:53PM +, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: On 15 Mar 2013, at 18:31, Mike Stok m...@stok.ca wrote: Even if it wasn't ... the question I try to ask is How can I make it easier to deploy my app? rather than What must I do to fit into your infrastructure?. Not what I was asking. That doesn't matter. Mike described the question he tries to ask and considered an answer to that question. This list allows us to discuss things that interest us and explore ideas related to the original question, even if they don't address that question directly. Then start a new thread under a relevant subject. Netiquette 101. It *is* a good topic and warrants a subject that attracts attention from people suffering from version angst.
Re: New perl features?
On 16 Mar 2013, at 11:50, DAVID HODGKINSON daveh...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 Mar 2013, at 09:09, Tom Hukins t...@eborcom.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:40:53PM +, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: On 15 Mar 2013, at 18:31, Mike Stok m...@stok.ca wrote: Even if it wasn't ... the question I try to ask is How can I make it easier to deploy my app? rather than What must I do to fit into your infrastructure?. Not what I was asking. That doesn't matter. Mike described the question he tries to ask and considered an answer to that question. This list allows us to discuss things that interest us and explore ideas related to the original question, even if they don't address that question directly. Then start a new thread under a relevant subject. Netiquette 101. And this is why I never want to help you do your work - which seems to be how you use this community so often. I could go on but I don't want to distract from what could be an interesting thread - with everyone's contributions especially how such information could be used Leo
Re: New perl features?
On 16/03/13 11:42, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: On 16 Mar 2013, at 08:31, Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote: On 03/15/2013 10:40 PM, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: ~~ and //= are the only new sigils I don't think 'sigils' means what you seem to think it means :-) Line noise? They are operators. Sigils are the things that go in front of variable names - $, @, %, and *. No new sigils for a long time. Dave...
Re: New perl features?
Poor forlorn formats with no sigil :( On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote: On 16/03/13 11:42, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: On 16 Mar 2013, at 08:31, Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote: On 03/15/2013 10:40 PM, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: ~~ and //= are the only new sigils I don't think 'sigils' means what you seem to think it means :-) Line noise? They are operators. Sigils are the things that go in front of variable names - $, @, %, and *. No new sigils for a long time. Dave...
