Re: Jobs in London
Depends how far you want to go (between which zones). Map of zones is here:- http://www.tfl.gov.uk/gettingaround/1106.aspx Current tickets prices are here:- http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/14416.aspx There are discounts for using Oyster cards, and for weekly / monthly / annual tickets. Dan On 28/02/11 17:12, marcos rebelo wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 17:40, David Cantrellda...@cantrell.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:04:13PM +, Dave Mitchell wrote: Then there's 20% VAT on most things you buy. No there isn't. VAT is not charged on rent and mortgages, which is most peoples' biggest cost by far. Your second biggest cost will probably be travel. Public transport fares also have no VAT. How much is the Public Transport fares in London? -- David Cantrell | semi-evolved ape-thing More people are driven insane through religious hysteria than by drinking alcohol.-- W C Fields
Re: YAPC Pisa
A quick google for one time credit card number seems to suggest that PayPal offer one-use-only credit card numbers. No idea if that's actually true, but might be worth a look Dan Peter Corlett wrote: On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:27:42PM +0100, Chris Jack wrote: [...] It's a long time since I sent credit card details by email and whilst I think it is obviously a very bad thing... If you have to do it, can I suggest you try to avoid putting the whole 16 digits in 1234 5678 1234 5678 style format as this would be a very easy thing to parse for. Rather think up something like: An unencrypted credit card number sent over the Internet is highly unlikely to be compromised while in transit. There's just too much other traffic and it's too much effort while there is lower-hanging fruit. The real risk here is that the hotel apparently doesn't have a clue about security of credit card numbers. For example, they may just print out the email, and then shuffle over to reception to enter the number into their PDQ machine. The printout quickly gets lost in the pile of other paper clutter there, for any passing scrote to help themselves to. Obfuscation won't help you there.
Re: SHA question
Dermot wrote: [snip] Incident I get poor results from the MD5 compared with SHA so I can't relie on MD5 for MD5 (md5_base64) results: mr_485_htu_AST.pdf 116caa6cc1705db23a36feb11c8c4113 32 MR_2891.pdf 01f73c142dae9f9f403bbab543b6aa6f 32 duplicate.pdf 01f73c142dae9f9f403bbab543b6aa6f 32 MR_2898.pdf 01f73c142dae9f9f403bbab543b6aa6f 32 PR_A02.pdf 5552e6587357f9967dc0bc83153cca63 32 mr_485_htu_hrt.pdf 116caa6cc1705db23a36feb11c8c4113 32 PR_A01.pdf 5552e6587357f9967dc0bc83153cca63 32 I think you must have a bug. Finding three MD5 collisions in seven files that are actually different to each other would be a really remarkable result Dan
