Re: Available...
On 2 October 2012 12:06, Denny <2...@denny.me> wrote: ... > Short memory. ... > Or post a meta-question here, of course :) Yes, seems like it ;) [ When is a question not a question? ]
Re: Available...
On 2 October 2012 12:06, Denny <2...@denny.me> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 10:59 +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: >> I'd assumed -discuss was for talking about the jobs posted on jobs >> and attempting to unpick who the company was. > > Short memory. Citing your own response is cheating, maybe he was hoping for a more authoritive answer ;) A. -- Aaron J Trevena, BSc Hons http://www.aarontrevena.co.uk LAMP System Integration, Development and Consulting
Re: Available...
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 10:59 +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > I'd assumed -discuss was for talking about the jobs posted on jobs > and attempting to unpick who the company was. Short memory. Forwarded Message From: Denny <2...@denny.me> Reply-to: "London.pm Perl M\[ou\]ngers" To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers Subject: Re: Availability? Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:42:11 +0100 On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 10:58 +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > Is there an etiquette for advertising one's availability for > slavery here? Post an 'available' ad to jobs-discuss? Or post a meta-question here, of course :)
Re: Available...
On 1 Oct 2012, at 19:50, Tom Hukins wrote: > > jobs-discuss deals with conversation amongst group members - various > people have posted "looking for work" announcements there before. I'd assumed -discuss was for talking about the jobs posted on jobs and attempting to unpick who the company was. Apologies.
Re: Available...
On 1 Oct 2012, at 21:15, Paul Makepeace wrote: > Do you shout your name because some recruiters shout PERL? Fishing for pearls...
Re: Available...
Do you shout your name because some recruiters shout PERL?
Re: Available...
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:42:57AM +0100, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote: > Just thought I'd throw it out there so I don't have to deal with > recruiters if at all possible, but I'm available right now. I should mention that we have separate jobs mailing lists for this kind of thing. I suspect Dave has forgotten about them. jobs-announce deals with job announcements, and by extension I'd guess vacancy announcements, although I'm not sure we've used it for that before. jobs-discuss deals with conversation amongst group members - various people have posted "looking for work" announcements there before. I dislike us having these separate lists, but after various people were unpleasant towards recruiters on the main list, they seemed necessary several years ago. Consequently, we have a policy. Let's stick to the few policies we have without creating the need for enforcement. Tom
