Re: Procmail / Filters
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:05:33PM +, Rob Thompson wrote: > I may have imagined it... or it may have been on another list > Has there been a discussion about Procmail and/or mail filters ... > specifically getting a perl script to behave as a procmail filter? If so, > when did this take place as I can't find it in the archives (of course it > may - if it happened - have had a totally non-related subject line) I remember the discussion but I'm not sure when it happened. However, you are very likely to want to look at: http://simon-cozens.org/writings/mail-audit.html and CPAN Mail::Audit. MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
Re: Procmail / Filters
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:05:33PM +, Rob Thompson wrote: > > Has there been a discussion about Procmail and/or mail filters ... > > you are very likely to want to look at: > http://simon-cozens.org/writings/mail-audit.html > and CPAN Mail::Audit. or Mail::Procmail, if the 'procmail' recipe syntax is more your thing. No personal experience, but Johan Vromans tends to plug it when someone else plugs Mail::Audit on newsgroups. To each his own style; just wanted to give an alternative. (I use Mail::Audit FWIW, though in a very limited way at the moment.) Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Re: Procmail / Filters
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 02:39:13PM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote: > Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > you are very likely to want to look at: > > http://simon-cozens.org/writings/mail-audit.html > or Mail::Procmail, if the 'procmail' recipe syntax is more your thing. I like to use real procmail, and have it call perl stuff if I need to do any heavy lifting. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david The voices said it's a good day to clean my weapons
