Linda,
The ISIS and OSPF sub-TLVs are following the base ISIs and OSPF su-TLV
structures.
In ISIS it's always 1 octet for type and length each and in OSPF it is 2
otctets each.
This will help maintain the consistency of protocol processing.
Hope that clarifies
Rgds
Shraddha
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 8:29 AM
To: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Is it necessary for OSPF and ISIS to have different FAD Constraint
Sub-TLV in draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-1?
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Shraddha, Bill, Rajesh, Bruno, Peter, and Tony:
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-1 has two different sub-TLVs for ISIS FAD
Constraint and OSPF FAD constraint. But the only differences are:
* ISIS Exclude Minimum Bandwidth sub-TLV has one octet for Type and Length
* OSPF Exclude Minimum Bandwidth sub-TLV has two octets for Type and Length
Why can't just have one Exclude Minimum Bandwidth sub-TLV to be used for both
ISIS and OSPF FlexAlgo?
Thank you very much,
Linda Dunbar
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
