[luau] Fedora Core 1 seems slow

2004-01-07 Thread Thomas Hackett

Hi Guys,

I've just finished installing Fedora Core 1 and to be honest, I'm kind 
of disappointed.  It seems really slow compared to Debian.  I'm using 
it on a PIII 450 MHz IBM ThinkPad 390x with 160 MB or ram.  I used to 
run Debian unstable and that worked fine.


I'm wondering if there's something I need to do to speed up Fedora.  I 
think I did a pretty standard install.  Could I have put on too much?  
Are there things I need to shutdown?  Would updating to the latest 
versions of packages help things?


- Tom Hackett



Re: [luau] Fedora Core 1 seems slow

2004-01-07 Thread Warren Togami

Thomas Hackett wrote:

Hi Guys,

I've just finished installing Fedora Core 1 and to be honest, I'm kind 
of disappointed.  It seems really slow compared to Debian.  I'm using it 
on a PIII 450 MHz IBM ThinkPad 390x with 160 MB or ram.  I used to run 
Debian unstable and that worked fine.


I'm wondering if there's something I need to do to speed up Fedora.  I 
think I did a pretty standard install.  Could I have put on too much?  
Are there things I need to shutdown?  Would updating to the latest 
versions of packages help things?


- Tom Hackett



One thing that really helps desktop application speed is waiting for the 
automatic prelink to happen.  prelink goes through all of your binaries 
and makes it so they launch and execute much faster.  I think it happens 
automatically once per day in cron, but you can force it as root with:


/etc/cron.daily/prelink

As far as shutting down services, most of the services are disabled by 
default when you install FC, however there still may be some extraneous 
stuff.  Use this command to list everything that is enabled in runlevel 
3 (text only mode):


chkconfig --list |grep 3:on

Similarly use this to list everything that is enabled in graphical mode:

chkconfig --list |grep 5:on

Then use this command to turn disable services from automatically starting:

chkconfig SERVICENAME off

You can use this command to turn off a service immediately:

service SERVICENAME stop

Be careful about not turning off critical system services...

Other than this, the only recommendation I can make is removing the 
"magicdev" package.  It uses about 1MB of memory while logged into GNOME 
and doesn't do much useful.  Sometimes it actually conflicts with what 
you are doing, especially CD burning.


Where do you see slowness?  Are you talking about desktop stuff?  Try it 
again after prelink and let me know how it goes.


Warren


Re: [luau] Limiting Access to Single File

2004-01-07 Thread Blake Vance
Yes, that's the situation. The archives have a thread where a recursive 
chmod was done as root necessitating a reinstall. I was thinking of 
something similar and really want to avoid that scenario.

Thanks for the help,
Blake
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 10:01, Blake Vance wrote: > RH9: How do I limit 
access of a particular account to one specific file?


Clarifications needed.  Are you talking about limiting the access of a 
samba user's account to a specific file in a shared samba directory?


--scott


_
Enjoy a special introductory offer for dial-up Internet access — limited 
time only! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup




Re: [luau] Limiting Access to Single File

2004-01-07 Thread Blake Vance
Seems my ~9a reply never made it. Yes, that is the situation. There is a 
case in the archives where someone used a recursive chmod as root, which due 
to the circumstances, necessitated a reinstall. I was also thinking of doing 
a chmod -R but would sure like to avoid that scenario.

Thanks for the help,
Blake


On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 10:01, Blake Vance wrote:
> RH9: How do I limit access of a particular account to one specific file?

Clarifications needed.  Are you talking about limiting the access of a
samba user's account to a specific file in a shared samba directory?

--scott


_
Have fun customizing MSN Messenger — learn how here!  
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_customize




Re: [luau] Fedora Core 1 seems slow

2004-01-07 Thread Thomas Hackett

Thanks for the tip Warren!

I'm pretty sure that I was to quick to judge Fedora Core 1.  I was 
reading about the new prelink feature while I updated the software last 
night.  I noticed that now the system is much more responsive.  
Prelinking is actually a great feature, if you can stand waiting just a 
bit during the initial slowness.  Does anyone know if there are other 
distributions which ship with prelinking enabled in the default 
install?  Fedora actually seems pretty cutting edge.


- Tom

On Jan 7, 2004, at 2:35 AM, Warren Togami wrote:


Thomas Hackett wrote:

Hi Guys,
I've just finished installing Fedora Core 1 and to be honest, I'm 
kind of disappointed.  It seems really slow compared to Debian.  I'm 
using it on a PIII 450 MHz IBM ThinkPad 390x with 160 MB or ram.  I 
used to run Debian unstable and that worked fine.
I'm wondering if there's something I need to do to speed up Fedora.  
I think I did a pretty standard install.  Could I have put on too 
much?  Are there things I need to shutdown?  Would updating to the 
latest versions of packages help things?

- Tom Hackett


One thing that really helps desktop application speed is waiting for 
the automatic prelink to happen.  prelink goes through all of your 
binaries and makes it so they launch and execute much faster.  I think 
it happens automatically once per day in cron, but you can force it as 
root with:


/etc/cron.daily/prelink