[LUAU] CJK in FC4

2005-08-10 Thread Hawaii Linux Institute
Aloha all,

A couple of days ago, a group of Fedora Core users at Harvard released a
set of bitmap fonts which cover complete CJK
Unified Ideographics (20,902 characters at 4 pixel sizes and two
weights, totalling more than 180,000 glyphs):

http://wqy.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi?BitmapSong (in simplified
Chinese)

After installed it, my first reaction was, this is grand theft, or at
least blatant plagiarism! But, hey, this is GPL. The original creator of
these fonts (Mr. Firefly) actually was very relieved that someone was
able to continue the torch and make the flame brighter.

Lack of CJK support used to be an Achilles heel for Linux, but it may
have become one of its most potent weapons.

In the English version of Windows XP-Pro, you are able to input CJK
fonts, but this ability is somewhat rudimentary. There are 3rd party
Windows programs for inputting Chinese characters, but since software is
mostly free in the Chinese-speaking commuity, no one is willing to care
about their quality.

In a previous thread, I briefly mentioned how drastically the process of
I/O'ing Chinese fonts has improved under iiimf in FC4. Here, I will do a
very simple demo regarding Japanese characters:

- miyamoto musashi - みやもと むさし - ミヤモトムサシ - 宮本武蔵

The first group of characters are your keyboard input. When iiimf is
running and activated, your screen will show the corresponding Hiragana
characters (2nd group). Press down cursor key, they convert to Katakana
(3rd group). Press space key followed by the down cursor key, a list of
Kanjis will pop up for you to select (4th group). Isn't this great?

If you have connections to our local CJK community, and/or are
interested in promoting Linux in that community, and would like to have
a sounding board, please let me know. Wayne

(Don't know Japanese? McKinley has an English-centric Japanese language
program. After 30 dollars and 30 hours, you may become itchy to try to
sell Fedora machines in Japan.)


[LUAU] Load Average Question

2005-08-10 Thread Matt Darnell
Aloha,

After goggling (sp?) load average I was surprised at how controversial
it is.  It also make we wonder about the CPU % we get from Micro$oft.

Anyway.If I have a server with a normal load average of ~ 0.20  I
load up an SMP kernel with an additional processor, should the load
average drop to ~ 0.10 or can the load average go higher with less
worry?

Aloha,
Matt


Re: [LUAU] Load Average Question

2005-08-10 Thread Angela Kahealani
On Wednesday , 2005-08-10 09:01, Matt Darnell wrote:
 Aloha,

 After goggling (sp?) load average I was surprised at how

Wow, you got the cool 3D-vision goggles on your system?

 controversial it is.  It also make we wonder about the CPU % we get
 from Micro$oft.

No Comment... it would be off topic... this being a Linux list...
or...
What you mean We? (100% MicroShaft free since 1993).

 Anyway.If I have a server with a normal load average of ~ 0.20 
 I load up an SMP kernel with an additional processor, should the load
 average drop to ~ 0.10 or can the load average go higher with less
 worry?

 Aloha, Matt

One needs to carefully analyze factors in addition to load average to 
determine where in your system the bottlenecks lay. Load is related to 
the number of tasks... running plus waiting... but upon what resource 
are they waiting? 

-- 
All information and transactions are non negotiable and are private 
between the parties. All rights reserved without prejudice.
Copyright 2005 Angela Kahealani http://www.kahealani.com/


Re: [LUAU] Load Average Question

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Thompson


On Aug 10, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Matt Darnell wrote:


Aloha,

After goggling (sp?) load average I was surprised at how controversial
it is.  It also make we wonder about the CPU % we get from Micro$oft.

Anyway.If I have a server with a normal load average of ~ 0.20  I
load up an SMP kernel with an additional processor, should the load
average drop to ~ 0.10 or can the load average go higher with less
worry?


as with many things, it depends.

If you're really CPU bound, then... maybe.

I could, if you wanted the demo, artificially raise your load average  
to  300 and you'd still have a nice, crisp system.


what are you trying to do?




[LUAU] IT Opportunity

2005-08-10 Thread Al Plant

Luau People...

Price Busters is looking for an entry level IT person for their Honolulu 
operation. A knowledge of some microsoft programs and Linux basics is 
helpfull. Person would also need to know hardware maintenance and 
general networking. Also be able to provide printouts of inventory lists 
etc.  This is a learning position for retail business IT.


Call Tate Goodman for particulars. 389-4914

Al Plant

 -- Webmaster- http://hawaiidakine.com Admin- http://freebsdinfo.org --
Supporting Open Source Computing - - FreeBSD 4.11/5.3/6.0 -- Debian Linux 3*
All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carroll



Re: [LUAU] Load Average Question

2005-08-10 Thread Matt Darnell
  Aloha,
 
  After goggling (sp?) load average I was surprised at how controversial
  it is.  It also make we wonder about the CPU % we get from Micro$oft.
 
  Anyway.If I have a server with a normal load average of ~ 0.20  I
  load up an SMP kernel with an additional processor, should the load
  average drop to ~ 0.10 or can the load average go higher with less
  worry?
 
 as with many things, it depends.
 
 If you're really CPU bound, then... maybe.
 
 I could, if you wanted the demo, artificially raise your load average
 to  300 and you'd still have a nice, crisp system.
 
 what are you trying to do?

We have a server that sometimes has has a load averavge of 1.0 or a
little higher.

We are adding another processor to help with the load.

Sometimes the server can be kind of sluggish.  I think the SMP will
help b/c there are lots of processes that can be divided.

-Matt