[luau] (no subject)

[Christopher Czach]

Do you have any of those openoffice cdroms, if so would you be open to 
mailing me one, if so LMK.






_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

[luau] (no subject)

[John Christian]

LinuxWorld: Amazon.com Clicks With Linux

Biggest savings came from wider choice of hardware on the lower-cost
Intel platform, as compared with higher-cost RISC-based Unix servers.

http://computerworld.com/newsletter/0%2C4902%2C73617%2C0.html?nlid=ROI

__
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com

[luau] (no subject)

[John Pescador]

I sent an e-mail to the Department of Accounting and
General Services (DAGS) Inventory Managment Branch
regarding old computer equipment.  The reply:

I am not familiar with is group. Surplues state
property can be donated to nonprofit tax exempt
charitable organizations with 501C3 federal tax 
exempt status, such as Goodwill, Big Brothers,
Salvation Army, etc.

Agencies have the authority to sell surplus state
property by auction, advertisement or if not feasible
by telephone or other means of solicitation (at least
3 contacts), except not to an employee of the
disposing agency.

Another reason to dispose the property to an
organization would be: if the disposal will benefit
the State, such as saving the expense to remove 
and disposed the property (be cautious on this method
- the justification must be in detail to insure no
conflict of interest and to prevent similar
organizations complains on favoritism) .

Before the above method of disposal , usable state
property has to be offered to other state agencies -
listing on the SPO Excess State Property
list.

Should you have any question on this matter, please
call me at 831-6756.

Thanks, RonO


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

[luau] (no subject)

[taumaia Lealofi]

?Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here

Re: [luau] (no subject)

[yuser]

I may have missed some of this thread...


On 22 Jul 2002 at 13:49, Michael Ableyev wrote:

> service swat
> {
> port= 901
> socket_type = stream
> wait= no
> only_from = localhost
> user= root
> server  = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat
> log_on_failure  += USERID
> disable =  No
> }

The Redhat RPM for swat puts things in slightly different place then if you 
compile and install Samba manually.  For RH, swat is in /usr/sbin/swat.   If 
you want to also 
connect to swat from all other machines on your local network you can add 
192.168.1.0,  the 0 is a wildcard for xinetd.conf.

localhost is defined in your /etc/hosts file.  Doing anything localhost will 
connect to the a loopback interface which has an IP of 127.0.0.1 which is the 
local machine.  A 
/sbin/ifconfig will show your interfaces).  I have never seen a system with 
TCP/IP that did not follow this standard.  Instead of modifing config files for 
various applications to 
include your NIC's ip address I would get used to using localhost when you need 
to use a service on the local machine (like http://localhost:901).  Just like 
telnet localhost 
will telnet into the same machine and your mailserver is at localhost:25 etc...

> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ray Strode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Under network config, /etc/hosts and lmhostsunder /etc/samba I have it
> > > as 192.168.1.76
> > >
> > > When I try to connect to smb.conf via SWAT using
> > > http://192.168.1.76:901  it rejects me.
> > >
> > > But when I connect to SWAT using http://127.0.0.1:901
> > >  it goes through.
> > >
> > > Why is that?
> > >
> > I think the rationale is that the configuration should only take place
> > on the
> > local machine.  127.0.0.1 is the loopback ip, and can only ever be accessed
> > by the local machine, so it's the most secure ip to allow connections from.
> >
> > --Ray
> >

Re: [luau] (no subject)

[Michael Ableyev]

Alrighty,
This is what a search on google for man swat has brought us.
So.. if you ARE indeed running xinetd then this is what you have to look at.

## /etc/xinetd.d/swat
service swat
{
port= 901
socket_type = stream
wait= no
only_from = localhost
user= root
server  = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat
log_on_failure  += USERID
disable =  No
}

the "only_from=localhost" is appearently what's causing your problem. try 
commenting that line out or adding you internal nic's ip
to it (is that the correct format?)

G'luck.

- Original Message -
From: "Ray Strode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 13:21
Subject: Re: [luau] (no subject)


> >
> >
> > Under network config, /etc/hosts and lmhostsunder /etc/samba I have it
> > as 192.168.1.76
> >
> > When I try to connect to smb.conf via SWAT using
> > http://192.168.1.76:901 <http://192.168.1.76:901/> it rejects me.
> >
> > But when I connect to SWAT using http://127.0.0.1:901
> > <http://127.0.0.1:901/> it goes through.
> >
> > Why is that?
> >
> I think the rationale is that the configuration should only take place
> on the
> local machine.  127.0.0.1 is the loopback ip, and can only ever be accessed
> by the local machine, so it's the most secure ip to allow connections from.
>
> --Ray
>
>
> ___
> LUAU mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau
>

Re: [luau] (no subject)

[Ray Strode]

Under network config, /etc/hosts and lmhostsunder /etc/samba I have it 
as 192.168.1.76


When I try to connect to smb.conf via SWAT using 
http://192.168.1.76:901  it rejects me.


But when I connect to SWAT using http://127.0.0.1:901 
 it goes through.


Why is that?

I think the rationale is that the configuration should only take place 
on the

local machine.  127.0.0.1 is the loopback ip, and can only ever be accessed
by the local machine, so it's the most secure ip to allow connections from.

--Ray

RE: [luau] (no subject)

[Randall Oshita]

Red Hat 7.3
"Default access restrictions only allow localhost access"; but shouldn't
the localhost be 192.168.1.76 instead of 127.0.0.1? - Since I used
192.168.1.76 in my /etc/samba localhost and as my workstation IP?
I will also try the commands when I get home.
Thanks.

Randall Oshita, IT Manager
Uniserve, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 808.956.1065
Fax: 808.956.1008
Web: www.uniserveinc.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Togami
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [luau] (no subject)

On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 11:04, Randall Oshita wrote:
> The problem is I cant find my inetd file. I looked in my /etc/services
> and did a gnome search to no avail. 
> My SWAT works it's just that it connects on 127.0.0.1 but all my IP
and
> localhost settings are set to 192.168.1.76. It dose not make any
sense. 
> I've got a black sheep Linux?? lol
>  
> Randall Oshita

What brand and version of Linux are you running?  Try the following:

service xinetd start
chkconfig xinetd on
chkconfig swat on

Then try to access SWAT via the web browser.  Default access
restrictions allow only localhost access so be aware of that.


___
LUAU mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau

RE: [luau] (no subject)

[Warren Togami]

On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 11:04, Randall Oshita wrote:
> The problem is I cant find my inetd file. I looked in my /etc/services
> and did a gnome search to no avail. 
> My SWAT works it's just that it connects on 127.0.0.1 but all my IP and
> localhost settings are set to 192.168.1.76. It dose not make any sense. 
> I've got a black sheep Linux?? lol
>  
> Randall Oshita

What brand and version of Linux are you running?  Try the following:

service xinetd start
chkconfig xinetd on
chkconfig swat on

Then try to access SWAT via the web browser.  Default access
restrictions allow only localhost access so be aware of that.

RE: [luau] (no subject)

[Randall Oshita]

The problem
is I cant find my inetd
file. I looked in my /etc/services and did a gnome search to no avail. 

My SWAT
works it’s just that it connects on 127.0.0.1 but all my IP and localhost settings are set to 192.168.1.76. It dose not
make any sense. 

I’ve
got a black sheep Linux?? lol

 



Randall Oshita



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ho'ala Greevy
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [luau] (no subject)

 



Randall, 





 





have you enabled swat in
inetd or xinetd?  Most often swat is enabled by uncommenting its entry in
/etc/services and then restarting the (x)inetd daemon.





 





btw, there's a 1-session
Samba Class being offered at HCC this Thursday evening :-]  --> 





http://www.hcc.hawaii.edu/pcatt/training/operatingsys/index.html






 





Ho'ala





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Randall Oshita
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [luau] (no subject)

Under
network config, /etc/hosts and lmhosts under /etc/samba I have it as
192.168.1.76

When
I try to connect to smb.conf via SWAT using http://192.168.1.76:901
it rejects me.

But
when I connect to SWAT using http://127.0.0.1:901
it goes through.

Why
is that?

Thanks.

Randall 

 

 

Randall Oshita, IT Manager

Uniserve Inc.

email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

web : www.uniserveinc.com

Ph : 808.956.1065

 

 

RE: [luau] (no subject)

[Ho'ala Greevy]

Randall, 
 
have 
you enabled swat in inetd or xinetd?  Most often swat is enabled by 
uncommenting its entry in /etc/services and then restarting the (x)inetd 
daemon.
 
btw, 
there's a 1-session Samba Class being offered at HCC this Thursday evening 
:-]  --> 
http://www.hcc.hawaii.edu/pcatt/training/operatingsys/index.html 

 
Ho'ala

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On 
  Behalf Of Randall OshitaSent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:58 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [luau] (no 
  subject)
  
  Under network config, /etc/hosts and lmhosts 
  under /etc/samba I have it as 192.168.1.76
  When I try to 
  connect to smb.conf via SWAT using http://192.168.1.76:901 it rejects 
  me.
  But when I connect 
  to SWAT using http://127.0.0.1:901 it goes 
  through.
  Why is 
  that?
  Thanks.
  Randall 
  
   
   
  Randall 
  Oshita, IT 
  Manager
  Uniserve 
  Inc.
  email 
  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  web 
  : www.uniserveinc.com
  Ph 
  : 808.956.1065
   
   

Re: [luau] (no subject)

[Michael Ableyev]

Check SWAT configuration, it's proly setup to respond only on localhost.

- Original Message - 
From: Randall Oshita 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 20:57
Subject: [luau] (no subject)


Under network config, /etc/hosts and lmhosts under /etc/samba I have it as 
192.168.1.76
When I try to connect to smb.conf via SWAT using http://192.168.1.76:901 it 
rejects me.
But when I connect to SWAT using http://127.0.0.1:901 it goes through.
Why is that?
Thanks.
Randall 
 
 
Randall Oshita, IT Manager
Uniserve Inc.
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web : www.uniserveinc.com
Ph : 808.956.1065
 
 

[luau] (no subject)

[Randall Oshita]

Under network config, /etc/hosts and lmhosts
under /etc/samba I have it as 192.168.1.76

When I try to connect
to smb.conf via SWAT using http://192.168.1.76:901 it rejects me.

But when I connect to
SWAT using http://127.0.0.1:901 it goes
through.

Why is that?

Thanks.

Randall 

 

 

Randall
Oshita, IT
Manager

Uniserve
Inc.

email
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

web :
www.uniserveinc.com

Ph :
808.956.1065

 

 

[luau] (no subject)

[Vikram Khurana]

Hi,

I'm a LINUX newbie & joined this list last week.

Reading thro the archives I read about the LINUX POS terminal project
undertaken by Scott at Pricebusters. Not finding any posts in the last
month on it, just wanted to know how it was progressing.

Admittedly I didn't understand even half of what was said in the posts,
but the idea makes a lot of sense.

Would it be any easier to use the free hardware being received for POS
purposes than for schools? I would think some young enterprenuers would
be more than eager to give it a try & provide good publicity.

Vikram