Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Lubuntu Manual?

2011-07-29 Thread Swapnil Bhartiya



I think the excitement about documentation is great, you can never
work too hard on documentation. However I don't see the value in
creating yet another source. I'd be more excited to see people
contributing to the already existing documentation on the Wiki [0],
the help site [1] [2] and the semi-official manual [3]. Dispersing
effort on multiple projects to achieve the same goal seems a bit
counter-productive to me but I guess that's the great thing about
Linux, everyone is free to do as they please.

[0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu
[1] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation
[2] https://help.ubuntu.com/11.04/ubuntu-help/index.html
[3] http://ubuntu-manual.org/



I totally understand and agree with you. We are trying to create 
user-centric manual for all major distros and Lubuntu is going to be a 
hot property. The users who come to Muktware to read stories will be 
able to see benefits from such manuals. Since all manuals are at one 
place, they can also learn how something is done on other distros.


In the end all it is going to do is complement each other.

NOTE: We are about to publish a user-centric manual of Arch Linux as 
well :-). So, you can look at it as all the quality manuals at one 
place. We will assist the team with the official manual as well. Our 
content is released under CC licence so anyone can use it.


Swapnil

--
bSwapnil Bhartiya/bbr
Editor: Muktware.combr
Skype: No Way...its non-free. Looking for alternativesbr
Facebook: http://facebook.com/mukwtarebr
Twitter: http://twitter.com/muktware

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Can be lubuntu software center good thing?

2011-07-29 Thread PCMan
I'd suggest that you do some investigate to see what's the cause of
performance problems of software center first, and to see if avoiding
them is possible. If it's not possible to avoid the performance
problems, then go for a simplified synaptic.
This could save you quite a lot of time for try and error later.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Stefano eco.st...@fastwebnet.it wrote:
 yes, this project for me is only for fun.
 my question is: we need a simplex synaptic or a lighter USC?

 Stephen Smally

 On 28/07/2011 21:28, Julien Lavergne wrote:
 Le Thursday 28 July 2011 à 17:29 +0200, Stefano a écrit :
 i can say that on my 64 bit system lubuntu software center uses 50 MB
 RAM less than ubuntu software center (30 mb). the script will be less
 weight than 1 MB, it depends only on gtk and apt.
 anyway i think that lubuntu software center should be a kind of more
 user-friendly synaptic, and not a totally light-rewritten on ubuntu
 software center.

 The initial plan was to rewrite the front-end of Software-center, to
 make it simpler and lighter than the current one. Rewrite an entire
 application is IMO too much of work, and you loose all the invisible
 work done by USC.

 If you want to work on a separate program, why not, but it needs, at
 least, to be better than Synaptic, and have real advantages vs USC. You
 need to think about depends, memory usage, but also UI. There is no
 sense to do a software-center if the UI is worst than Synaptic. Also,
 package manager need to be very stable and well tested, it's an
 important piece of the system.

 Currently, your program is not ready to replace the 2 previous examples.
 If you want to continue, be aware that it will be more complex than you
 think to build it from scratch.

 Regards,
 Julien Lavergne



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Lubuntu Manual?

2011-07-29 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hi,

I don't get as much time as I'd like to keep up with the various How To's,
but the IRC support guys do keep the FAQ section [1] updated regularly.

Regards,

Phill.
[1] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/FAQ

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, James Gifford ja...@jamesrgifford.comwrote:

 On the topic of documentation, I've been working (in between my summer job)
 on trying to expand the Lubuntu documentation (how do I do X?) on
 AskUbuntu.com - but unfortunately I don't have much there yet.

 Cheers,
 James Gifford

 On Jul 29, 2011, at 5:10, Swapnil Bhartiya swapnil.bhart...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
  I think the excitement about documentation is great, you can never
  work too hard on documentation. However I don't see the value in
  creating yet another source. I'd be more excited to see people
  contributing to the already existing documentation on the Wiki [0],
  the help site [1] [2] and the semi-official manual [3]. Dispersing
  effort on multiple projects to achieve the same goal seems a bit
  counter-productive to me but I guess that's the great thing about
  Linux, everyone is free to do as they please.
 
  [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu
  [1] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation
  [2] https://help.ubuntu.com/11.04/ubuntu-help/index.html
  [3] http://ubuntu-manual.org/
 
 
  I totally understand and agree with you. We are trying to create
 user-centric manual for all major distros and Lubuntu is going to be a hot
 property. The users who come to Muktware to read stories will be able to see
 benefits from such manuals. Since all manuals are at one place, they can
 also learn how something is done on other distros.
 
  In the end all it is going to do is complement each other.
 
  NOTE: We are about to publish a user-centric manual of Arch Linux as well
 :-). So, you can look at it as all the quality manuals at one place. We will
 assist the team with the official manual as well. Our content is released
 under CC licence so anyone can use it.
 
  Swapnil
 
  --
  bSwapnil Bhartiya/bbr
  Editor: Muktware.combr
  Skype: No Way...its non-free. Looking for alternativesbr
  Facebook: http://facebook.com/mukwtarebr
  Twitter: http://twitter.com/muktware
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
  Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Can be lubuntu software center good thing?

2011-07-29 Thread Yorvyk
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:52:54 -0400
Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset jpx...@gmail.com wrote:

 
   we need a simplex synaptic or a lighter USC?
 
 
 A lighter USC - synaptic if far too complicated for the average user :/
 
In what way is Synaptic 'far too complicated'?

To make USC faster all that needs doing is the unnecessary bits removed.  Get 
rid of the reviews and pretty pictures and, viola, Synaptic!


-- 
Steve Cook (Yorvyk)

http://lubuntu.net 

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] About the recent slowdown of developement

2011-07-29 Thread PCMan
Some may noted that the development of pcmanfm and other lxde stuff
slowed down significantly recently.
I'm currently preparing for my license examination in order to get my
license for internal medicine specialty.
The examination will be on Sep 24 and on Oct 16. If I can pass the
exam, I'll have more free time later.
In my country, it's a very important advanced license exam for medical
doctors. So I need to disappear for a while.
I'll still take some time to fix the most critical bugs like failure
to build or segmentation fault on startup when possible.
Other less critical ones will be postponed. Sorry for the inconvinience.

At this moment, I think it's reasonable to have a new 0.9.9 release
for pcmanfm first since much has been fixed so far. If some issues are
found after the release, a 0.9.9.1 should be enough.
Any objection?
If there are no major blockers for a new release, I plan to do a
version bump for soname of libfm and do some final checks before the
release.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Can be lubuntu software center good thing?

2011-07-29 Thread Julien Lavergne
Le Friday 29 July 2011 à 15:44 +0100, Yorvyk a écrit :
  A lighter USC - synaptic if far too complicated for the average
 user :/
  
 In what way is Synaptic 'far too complicated'?
 
 To make USC faster all that needs doing is the unnecessary bits
 removed.  Get rid of the reviews and pretty pictures and, viola,
 Synaptic! 

+1 for the lighter USC. Basically, we need a better UI to present
programs to install and remove. Synaptic is perfect for experiment
users, but a beginner will expect a list of real programs, not a list of
technical packages.

Regards,
Julien Lavergne


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] About the recent slowdown of developement

2011-07-29 Thread (Rafael Laguna)
Of course, your job and specialty are things that make you disappear,
just like everybody who has a job outside here, and even more if
there're licenses (exams) near. ou have updated a lot of things these
days (yes, we read your blog too :) ) and the actual status of PCManFM
is quite stable and the version number it arrived seems correct for me.

Maybe there will be things that we would ask you, but I think we have to
focus in the realease, make it stable (not only the core apps) and
adjust all pieces. That's why you can delegate your work. Just don't
really disappear, we'll have questions and doubts that only you could
achieve.

I'm not coder, so maybe I'm talking too much (my fault) and my oppinion
isn't so valid in this field, but testing your apps from git or other
unstable ppas satisfied me a lot. That 0.9.9.1 fix update sounds fine
for me.

I'm sure you'll get a great level. Go ahead with it!

-- 
Go to rafaellaguna.com

Go to Lubuntu.net
attachment: b3.pngattachment: b2.pngattachment: b1.pngattachment: face-smile.png___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Can be lubuntu software center good thing?

2011-07-29 Thread Stefano
This mean, for example, hide the libs or other not-app packages by default?

On 29/07/2011 18:01, Julien Lavergne wrote:
 Le Friday 29 July 2011 à 15:44 +0100, Yorvyk a écrit :
 A lighter USC - synaptic if far too complicated for the average
 user :/

 In what way is Synaptic 'far too complicated'?

 To make USC faster all that needs doing is the unnecessary bits
 removed.  Get rid of the reviews and pretty pictures and, viola,
 Synaptic! 
 
 +1 for the lighter USC. Basically, we need a better UI to present
 programs to install and remove. Synaptic is perfect for experiment
 users, but a beginner will expect a list of real programs, not a list of
 technical packages.
 
 Regards,
 Julien Lavergne
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Can be lubuntu software center good thing?

2011-07-29 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
2011/7/29 Stefano eco.st...@fastwebnet.it

 This mean, for example, hide the libs or other not-app packages by default?


Exactly! It must make the difference between packages and applications
for it to be user-friendly :)
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Can be lubuntu software center good thing?

2011-07-29 Thread Yorvyk
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:23:46 -0400
Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset jpx...@gmail.com wrote:

 2011/7/29 Stefano eco.st...@fastwebnet.it
 
  This mean, for example, hide the libs or other not-app packages by default?
 
 
 Exactly! It must make the difference between packages and applications
 for it to be user-friendly :)

Have a look at making the 'Sections' part of Synaptic list only applications 
and you'll have achieved what's required.

-- 
Steve Cook (Yorvyk)

http://lubuntu.net 

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] About the recent slowdown of developement

2011-07-29 Thread Phill Whiteside
I echo Rafael's comments. PCManFM is nice and stable. Get your exams done,
I'm sure you will do well :)

Regards,

Phill.

2011/7/29 神癒礁湖 (Rafael Laguna) rafaellag...@gmail.com

 **
 Of course, your job and specialty are things that make you disappear,
 just like everybody who has a job outside here, and even more if there're
 licenses (exams) near. ou have updated a lot of things these days (yes, we
 read your blog too [image: :)] ) and the actual status of PCManFM is quite
 stable and the version number it arrived seems correct for me.

 Maybe there will be things that we would ask you, but I think we have to
 focus in the realease, make it stable (not only the core apps) and adjust
 all pieces. That's why you can delegate your work. Just don't really
 disappear, we'll have questions and doubts that only you could achieve.

 I'm not coder, so maybe I'm talking too much (my fault) and my oppinion
 isn't so valid in this field, but testing your apps from git or other
 unstable ppas satisfied me a lot. That 0.9.9.1 fix update sounds fine for
 me.

 I'm sure you'll get a great level. Go ahead with it!

   --
   [image: Go to rafaellaguna.com] http://lubuntublog.rafaellaguna.com   
 [image:
 Go to Lubuntu.net] http://www.lubuntu.net

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
b1.pngb2.pngface-smile.pngb3.png___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp