Good news. Thanks Itamar.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 8:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
We have been running some extensive tests 30hrs now against the 2.9.4
branch, and did not detect any leaks. We will have it running a few more
days, if you wish to wait for more conclusive findings.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Prescott Nasser
geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
2.9.4 would make it in I assume because that will be our next official
release.
Sent from my Windows Phone
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:12 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g?
ooo totally forgot about nuget. we definitely need to get that setup.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:46 AM, digy digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to
only
2.9.4g branch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests
to
measure memory usage among other things.
There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren
for
Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days
and
will let you know how it went.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net wrote:
I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or
from
commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with
svn.
I'll
check next time I push something to svn.
But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
- michael
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
These are the original locations
2.9.4
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
2.9.4g
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
9_4g/
Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
Thanks,
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:
itamar.synhers...@gmail.com
]
On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also
for
potential
memory leaks
Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated
2.9.4
tag
I
can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the
strongly
signed patch applied to it?
2011/9/6 Digy digyd...@gmail.com
To avoid misunderstanding...
Community==all Lucene.Net users
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead
of
testing
against all projects using Lucene.Net
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
If you want to test it against a large project you could take a
look
at
how
RavenDB uses it?
At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
)
but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that
all
it's
unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test
case.
On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser
geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hey All,
How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using
it
for
sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we
are
ready
to
package this up and make it an official release? Or do we
have
some
tasks
left to take care of?
~Prescott
-
