Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
Ne moga da se sdurja da ne vmetna nyakoi dumi za redhat i pr. On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 09:35, George Danchev wrote: On Friday 15 February 2002 04:18, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 February 2002 20:45, you wrote: On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 mashinata e Pentium 150, o/c na 188, 64MB RAM. 10x predvaritelno! ami tokova zhivotno kato gcc-2.96 nqma officialno release-nato ot developers na gcc (vizh na site-a na gcc za da se ubedish). RH sa vzeli edin CVS snapshot na gcc nqkyde okolo 3.0 patch-nali sa go zdravo (s eksperimantalna cel maj, neznam) i v rezultat na koeto tova gcc e zdravo broken i e predvideno samo za user space kompilacii, a ne na kernels :). Oba4e s RH 7.2 trqbva da vyrvi i kgcc (tova maj e istinskoto gcc2.95 , ne sym mnogo siguren za versiqta no e naistina ot upstream developers na gcc) . Ta s tri dumi: Na tova kakto i na spekulaciite po-dolu okibknoveno se otgovoaraya s eto tova url http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html smqna na gcc s nesto po-4oveshko - 2.95.3 , 2.95.4 smqna na kernela - vanilla =2.4.10 (bez 2.4.11 i 2.4.15) [mislq 4e kernela kojto idva s RH 7.2 e 2.4.9-ac, smenqj go smelo s nqkoj vanilla, stoto ina4e si s forked kernel - s stara VM i t.n. i po-malko hora go nabludavat i pomagat pri problemi... poslednite vanilla 2.4 sa dosta koravi, vypreki 4e az neiskam da se razdelqm s moq 2.4.10 zvqr ;] Distribuciite obiknoveno izbirat kernela koito e po-stabilen (t.e. bil e stress testvan sus razlichen harware). Taka che ako -ac seriyata kerneli raboti za redhat veroyatnosta da raboti _za men_ e po-golyama ot tazi na koito i da e vannila kernel. kgcc koeto redhat shipvat vuv 7.x e egcs 1.1.2 = gcc 2.91.66. , kompilatora na rh6.x Hmm. gcc-2.96 koeto idva s RH-7.2 ne bi triabvalo da ima problemi. ( Ili pone ne 4ak tolkova seriozen problem ). Po4ti edin mesec karah s nego. Po skoro mi prili4a kato OOM killer-a da se razvihria. Vypreki 4e s RH gcc naistina se stremi da usvoqva kolkoto se mozhe pove4e pamet (za da priklu4i po-byrzo s kompilaciqta), no go pravi taka da se kazhe dosta kulturno i zakonno, ne iziskva ot kernel-a da mu zadelq vse pove4e i pove4e pamet do bezkraj ako tova naistina ne e vyzmozhno. Ne mislq 4e tova e problema. A OOM killer-a ne pribyrzva s izbivaneto na bad procesite i sotvetno da izduha (iz4isti) heap-a im ot pametta 4e da osvobodi zaetite ot tqh mempages... toj polzva dosta slozhen algoritym i si znae rabotata (koga da kolq i besi:) idva kgcc - koeto e gcc-2.91-neshto si ako si compile-vash vanila kernel shte se polzva gcc-to.Probvai da compilirash bez da puskash X i razni sharenii. Ogledai dali predi da SEGFAULT-ne gcc-to ne ti dava niakakvi syobshteniq za greshi v coda koito compilirash. Dori i vanila 2.93 ima edin kup bugove koito kato stigne do greshka ot koiato ne moje da se vyzstanvi compilaciata oshte mnogo redove programen cod SEGFAULT-va. li4noto mi nabludenie e 4e gcc 2.95.3 i 2.95.4 sa zheleznite compilers kym momenta. Kakvoto im dadesh go smilat i proizvezhdat naistina stable izpylnim kod. a edno ot dobrite obqsneniq za gcc 2.96: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/faq.html http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/users_against_developers.html Struva mi se devloperite na mplayer izpolzvat edin kup dumi za da kajat prosto ne znam, za da opravdayat anti redhat nastroeniyata si i da izbyagat ot problemite na potencialnite potrebiteli vmesto da napravyat nyakakuv opit da gi reshat. ina4e oplakvaniq ot nego mnogo... a eto i kakvo e kazano v Documetation/Changes v 2.4.10 kernela v slu4aj 4e nqkoj nqma source na 2.4 pod ruka. A preporukite za kernela sa dobra otpravna to4ka za tova kyf da e compiler-a (kojto da kompilira ne samo kernel razbira se). The recommended compiler for the kernel is gcc 2.95.3 or .4, and it should be used when you need absolute stability. You may use gcc 3.0.x instead if you wish, although it may cause problems. Later versions of gcc have not received much testing for Linux kernel compilation, and there are almost certainly bugs (mainly, but not exclusively, in the kernel) that will need to be fixed in order to use these compilers. In any case, using pgcc instead of egcs or plain gcc is just asking for trouble. Note that gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer a supported kernel compiler. The kernel no longer works around bugs in gcc 2.7.2.3 and, in fact, will refuse to be compiled with it. egcs-1.1.2 has register allocation problems in very obscure cases. We have ensured the kernel does not trip these in any known situation. The 2.5 tree is likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds. The Red Hat gcc 2.96 compiler subtree can also be used to build this tree. You should ensure you
Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
Pyrvo iskam da se izvinq ako sym zasegnal nqkoj ... nqmam nisto protiv distribuciqta na RH, (naprotiv sega se u4a na RPM;), ne sym q otri4al i ne sym kazval na pitastiq da q smeni totalno a ako ima vreme prosto da opita na 4isto s druga 4e ne se znae kyde mozhe da e problema. Distribuciite obiknoveno izbirat kernela koito e po-stabilen (t.e. bil e stress testvan sus razlichen harware). Taka che ako -ac seriyata kerneli raboti za redhat veroyatnosta da raboti _za men_ e po-golyama ot tazi na koito i da e vannila kernel. kgcc koeto redhat shipvat vuv 7.x e egcs 1.1.2 = gcc 2.91.66. , kompilatora na rh6.x okz, no naj-merodavniq izto4nik za tova s koj compiler da se compilira dadeniq kernel e Documentation/Changes. li4noto mi nabludenie e 4e gcc 2.95.3 i 2.95.4 sa zheleznite compilers kym momenta. Kakvoto im dadesh go smilat i proizvezhdat naistina stable izpylnim kod. a edno ot dobrite obqsneniq za gcc 2.96: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/faq.html http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/users_against_developers.html Struva mi se devloperite na mplayer izpolzvat edin kup dumi za da kajat prosto ne znam, za da opravdayat anti redhat nastroeniyata si i da izbyagat ot problemite na potencialnite potrebiteli vmesto da napravyat nyakakuv opit da gi reshat. vizh stanovishteto na GCC team, na MySQL team susto i t.n. i t.n. upstream developers kojto imat problemi s tozi 2.96 compiler na RH . Problema e 4e ako pri teb problema ne se proqvqva, to tova ne e garanciq 4e i pri drug ste e taka. Zavisi ot mnono raboti. ina4e oplakvaniq ot nego mnogo... a eto i kakvo e kazano v Documetation/Changes v 2.4.10 kernela v slu4aj 4e nqkoj nqma source na 2.4 pod ruka. A preporukite za kernela sa dobra otpravna to4ka za tova kyf da e compiler-a (kojto da kompilira ne samo kernel razbira se). The recommended compiler for the kernel is gcc 2.95.3 or .4, and it should be used when you need absolute stability. You may use gcc 3.0.x instead if you wish, although it may cause problems. Later versions of gcc have not received much testing for Linux kernel compilation, and there are almost certainly bugs (mainly, but not exclusively, in the kernel) that will need to be fixed in order to use these compilers. In any case, using pgcc instead of egcs or plain gcc is just asking for trouble. Note that gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer a supported kernel compiler. The kernel no longer works around bugs in gcc 2.7.2.3 and, in fact, will refuse to be compiled with it. egcs-1.1.2 has register allocation problems in very obscure cases. We have ensured the kernel does not trip these in any known situation. The 2.5 tree is likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds. The Red Hat gcc 2.96 compiler subtree can also be used to build this tree. You should ensure you use gcc-2.96-74 or later. gcc-2.96-54 will not build the kernel correctly. [az bih kazal zabravete za gcc-2.96, a ako go polzvate naj-dobriq izto4nik za otgovori otnosno problemi sa RH - tehnite mail lists i t.n., ama tova rabota li e ?!] Koe tochno te pritesnyava otnosno komunikaciyata s redhat? https://www.redhat.com/apps/support/resources/ ? https://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists/ ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ ? You missed the point! Ideqta mi beshe 4e po tozi na4in se poqvqvat distro specific problemi i resheniq bez tova da e neobhodimo. Patch-va se samo ako naistina ima problem i za tova se pishe v docs na distroto - kak, zasto sa apply-nati patches kym upstream sources, dava se vyzmozhnost po zhelanie na user-a i da ne se prilagat i t.n. Moje i da ne izpipvat vsichko dokrai, zashtoto sa vse pak sa komersialna organizaciya, imat srokove, po-vajni i po-malovajni klienti i t.n. obache sus sigurnost ne sa hora koito byagat ot problemite ili puk te lujat v liceto che vsichko raboti. tova vyobste ne sym go imal predvid ! zabravih da kazha 4e na edno ot CD-tata na RH-7.2 ima i hacked versiq na glibc (hacknata ot RH razbira se)... edin mnogo knoledgeble tip ot tqh go e predlozhil i izpylnil, nari4at go object prelinking - neznam kakvo zna4i i kakvo sa promenili, no s nego prilozheniqta startirat adski byrzo no pyk za tova mogat i da brake-vat adski byrzo , vse oste e experimental oba4e... vizh da ne si s tova glibc - vsystnost ideq nqmam kak ste go poznaesh :) Ulrich Drepper - maintainera na glibc kakto i Jakub Jelinek ako ne se luja choveka su spomenatiya preload hack rabotyat za redhat, ako shte probvam nechii hackove to nai veroyatno da sa tehnite ;) da taka e , syglasen sym , koeto si e ubavo si e ubavo nqma spor. Vsi4ko tova go kazvam ne 4e imam nesto protiv RH, a zastoto v tehnite distros ima dosta iznenadi (dosta forked upstream sources, bez da ima realna pri4ina za tova v pove4eto slu4ai)... ponqkoga poor documented i user-a se 4udi kakvo i zasto stava ... report-va bugs , oba4e drugite kojto ne polzvat RH ne
Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 04:18:11 +0200 Àíãåë Âúëêîâ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gcc-2.96 koeto idva s RH-7.2 ne bi triabvalo da ima problemi. ( Ili pone ne 4ak tolkova seriozen problem ). Po4ti edin mesec karah s nego. Po skoro mi prili4a kato OOM killer-a da se razvihria. Vypreki 4e s RH idva kgcc - koeto e gcc-2.91-neshto si ako si compile-vash vanila kernel shte se polzva gcc-to.Probvai da compilirash bez da puskash X i razni sharenii. Ogledai dali predi da SEGFAULT-ne gcc-to ne ti dava niakakvi syobshteniq za greshi v coda koito compilirash. Dori i vanila 2.93 ima edin kup bugove koito kato stigne do greshka ot koiato ne moje da se vyzstanvi compilaciata oshte mnogo redove programen cod SEGFAULT-va. RH7.2 varvi i s gcc-3.0.2, no sa go krastili gcc3. No ne bi triabvalo gcc-2.96 ot RH7.2 da e problemno. HTH Pesho === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
RE: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
Drupnah gcc 3.0.3, no i toj ne mozhe da se kompilira :- Sas sashtija problem (vizh subj:) Njama instaliran X. Izdunkite idvat savsem sluchajno - kompilacijata si varvi savsem normalno i na proizvolen etap gcc-to gurmi. Ne moga da izpolzvam samo rpm-i, zashtoto mi potrjabva dhcp-3, ot tam bind-9.2, puk i poslednija precompiliran kernel ot redhat e 2.4.9. Shte opitam Memcheck. Antzi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Spas Pavlov Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0) On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 gcc-to na RH7.2. naistina e bygawo, no ne mislq che e chak do takawa stepen. Po tazi prichina izbqgwam kompilaciite dokolkoto e wyzmovno. Potyrsi si rpm na towa koeto ti trqbwa. Seaga obache se seshtam i drugo: Men edno pc me sbyrka ot preinstalacii, ne moga da kompiliram nito kernel normalno, nito nesto drugo (to beshe sys Slack 8) Okaza se che pametta e sduhana i to nqkyde wyw gornite adresi i se dyni samo kogaro RAM-a se natowari na 100%. (Predi towa mashinata e rabotila sys Win obsto wzeto normalno) Taka che ako iskash idi na www.memtest86.com i testwaj RAM-a. Spas Pavlov === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
mmm... RAM pametta? - Original Message - From: Anastas Giokov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0) Drupnah gcc 3.0.3, no i toj ne mozhe da se kompilira :- Sas sashtija problem (vizh subj:) Njama instaliran X. Izdunkite idvat savsem sluchajno - kompilacijata si varvi savsem normalno i na proizvolen etap gcc-to gurmi. Ne moga da izpolzvam samo rpm-i, zashtoto mi potrjabva dhcp-3, ot tam bind-9.2, puk i poslednija precompiliran kernel ot redhat e 2.4.9. Shte opitam Memcheck. Antzi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Spas Pavlov Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0) On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 gcc-to na RH7.2. naistina e bygawo, no ne mislq che e chak do takawa stepen. Po tazi prichina izbqgwam kompilaciite dokolkoto e wyzmovno. Potyrsi si rpm na towa koeto ti trqbwa. Seaga obache se seshtam i drugo: Men edno pc me sbyrka ot preinstalacii, ne moga da kompiliram nito kernel normalno, nito nesto drugo (to beshe sys Slack 8) Okaza se che pametta e sduhana i to nqkyde wyw gornite adresi i se dyni samo kogaro RAM-a se natowari na 100%. (Predi towa mashinata e rabotila sys Win obsto wzeto normalno) Taka che ako iskash idi na www.memtest86.com i testwaj RAM-a. Spas Pavlov === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
RE: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
RAM-a e na 6! Pusnah Memcheck na max, sled chas i polovina - vsichko e OK. Pone imate li ideja dali da dulbaja po h/w ili da preinstaliram na chisto? Antzi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Teodor Georgiev Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0) mmm... RAM pametta? - Original Message - From: Anastas Giokov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0) Drupnah gcc 3.0.3, no i toj ne mozhe da se kompilira :- Sas sashtija problem (vizh subj:) Njama instaliran X. Izdunkite idvat savsem sluchajno - kompilacijata si varvi savsem normalno i na proizvolen etap gcc-to gurmi. Ne moga da izpolzvam samo rpm-i, zashtoto mi potrjabva dhcp-3, ot tam bind-9.2, puk i poslednija precompiliran kernel ot redhat e 2.4.9. Shte opitam Memcheck. Antzi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Spas Pavlov Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0) On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 gcc-to na RH7.2. naistina e bygawo, no ne mislq che e chak do takawa stepen. Po tazi prichina izbqgwam kompilaciite dokolkoto e wyzmovno. Potyrsi si rpm na towa koeto ti trqbwa. Seaga obache se seshtam i drugo: Men edno pc me sbyrka ot preinstalacii, ne moga da kompiliram nito kernel normalno, nito nesto drugo (to beshe sys Slack 8) Okaza se che pametta e sduhana i to nqkyde wyw gornite adresi i se dyni samo kogaro RAM-a se natowari na 100%. (Predi towa mashinata e rabotila sys Win obsto wzeto normalno) Taka che ako iskash idi na www.memtest86.com i testwaj RAM-a. Spas Pavlov === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
RE: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Anastas Giokov wrote: RAM-a e na 6! Pusnah Memcheck na max, sled chas i polovina - vsichko e OK. Pone imate li ideja dali da dulbaja po h/w ili da preinstaliram na chisto? Antzi Chas i polovina ne stiga... Az vinagi go ostavqm po 24h , za da sum napulno siguren, che ne e v pametta problema... Edna preinstalaciq na chisto sushto mozhe da pomogne... Ama naj-dobre q vizh http://bitwizard.nl/sig11/, tam ima mnogo dobri obqsneniq ot kakvo mozhe da e. === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
On Friday 15 February 2002 04:18, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 February 2002 20:45, you wrote: On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 mashinata e Pentium 150, o/c na 188, 64MB RAM. 10x predvaritelno! ami tokova zhivotno kato gcc-2.96 nqma officialno release-nato ot developers na gcc (vizh na site-a na gcc za da se ubedish). RH sa vzeli edin CVS snapshot na gcc nqkyde okolo 3.0 patch-nali sa go zdravo (s eksperimantalna cel maj, neznam) i v rezultat na koeto tova gcc e zdravo broken i e predvideno samo za user space kompilacii, a ne na kernels :). Oba4e s RH 7.2 trqbva da vyrvi i kgcc (tova maj e istinskoto gcc2.95 , ne sym mnogo siguren za versiqta no e naistina ot upstream developers na gcc) . Ta s tri dumi: smqna na gcc s nesto po-4oveshko - 2.95.3 , 2.95.4 smqna na kernela - vanilla =2.4.10 (bez 2.4.11 i 2.4.15) [mislq 4e kernela kojto idva s RH 7.2 e 2.4.9-ac, smenqj go smelo s nqkoj vanilla, stoto ina4e si s forked kernel - s stara VM i t.n. i po-malko hora go nabludavat i pomagat pri problemi... poslednite vanilla 2.4 sa dosta koravi, vypreki 4e az neiskam da se razdelqm s moq 2.4.10 zvqr ;] Hmm. gcc-2.96 koeto idva s RH-7.2 ne bi triabvalo da ima problemi. ( Ili pone ne 4ak tolkova seriozen problem ). Po4ti edin mesec karah s nego. Po skoro mi prili4a kato OOM killer-a da se razvihria. Vypreki 4e s RH gcc naistina se stremi da usvoqva kolkoto se mozhe pove4e pamet (za da priklu4i po-byrzo s kompilaciqta), no go pravi taka da se kazhe dosta kulturno i zakonno, ne iziskva ot kernel-a da mu zadelq vse pove4e i pove4e pamet do bezkraj ako tova naistina ne e vyzmozhno. Ne mislq 4e tova e problema. A OOM killer-a ne pribyrzva s izbivaneto na bad procesite i sotvetno da izduha (iz4isti) heap-a im ot pametta 4e da osvobodi zaetite ot tqh mempages... toj polzva dosta slozhen algoritym i si znae rabotata (koga da kolq i besi:) idva kgcc - koeto e gcc-2.91-neshto si ako si compile-vash vanila kernel shte se polzva gcc-to.Probvai da compilirash bez da puskash X i razni sharenii. Ogledai dali predi da SEGFAULT-ne gcc-to ne ti dava niakakvi syobshteniq za greshi v coda koito compilirash. Dori i vanila 2.93 ima edin kup bugove koito kato stigne do greshka ot koiato ne moje da se vyzstanvi compilaciata oshte mnogo redove programen cod SEGFAULT-va. li4noto mi nabludenie e 4e gcc 2.95.3 i 2.95.4 sa zheleznite compilers kym momenta. Kakvoto im dadesh go smilat i proizvezhdat naistina stable izpylnim kod. a edno ot dobrite obqsneniq za gcc 2.96: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/faq.html http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/users_against_developers.html ina4e oplakvaniq ot nego mnogo... a eto i kakvo e kazano v Documetation/Changes v 2.4.10 kernela v slu4aj 4e nqkoj nqma source na 2.4 pod ruka. A preporukite za kernela sa dobra otpravna to4ka za tova kyf da e compiler-a (kojto da kompilira ne samo kernel razbira se). The recommended compiler for the kernel is gcc 2.95.3 or .4, and it should be used when you need absolute stability. You may use gcc 3.0.x instead if you wish, although it may cause problems. Later versions of gcc have not received much testing for Linux kernel compilation, and there are almost certainly bugs (mainly, but not exclusively, in the kernel) that will need to be fixed in order to use these compilers. In any case, using pgcc instead of egcs or plain gcc is just asking for trouble. Note that gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer a supported kernel compiler. The kernel no longer works around bugs in gcc 2.7.2.3 and, in fact, will refuse to be compiled with it. egcs-1.1.2 has register allocation problems in very obscure cases. We have ensured the kernel does not trip these in any known situation. The 2.5 tree is likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds. The Red Hat gcc 2.96 compiler subtree can also be used to build this tree. You should ensure you use gcc-2.96-74 or later. gcc-2.96-54 will not build the kernel correctly. [az bih kazal zabravete za gcc-2.96, a ako go polzvate naj-dobriq izto4nik za otgovori otnosno problemi sa RH - tehnite mail lists i t.n., ama tova rabota li e ?!] zabravih da kazha 4e na edno ot CD-tata na RH-7.2 ima i hacked versiq na glibc (hacknata ot RH razbira se)... edin mnogo knoledgeble tip ot tqh go e predlozhil i izpylnil, nari4at go object prelinking - neznam kakvo zna4i i kakvo sa promenili, no s nego prilozheniqta startirat adski byrzo no pyk za tova mogat i da brake-vat adski byrzo , vse oste e experimental oba4e... vizh da ne si s tova glibc - vsystnost ideq nqmam kak ste go poznaesh :) Vsi4ko tova go kazvam ne 4e imam nesto protiv RH, a zastoto v tehnite distros ima dosta iznenadi (dosta forked upstream sources, bez da ima realna pri4ina za tova v pove4eto slu4ai)...
lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 mashinata e Pentium 150, o/c na 188, 64MB RAM. 10x predvaritelno! Antzi === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 mashinata e Pentium 150, o/c na 188, 64MB RAM. 10x predvaritelno! ami tokova zhivotno kato gcc-2.96 nqma officialno release-nato ot developers na gcc (vizh na site-a na gcc za da se ubedish). RH sa vzeli edin CVS snapshot na gcc nqkyde okolo 3.0 patch-nali sa go zdravo (s eksperimantalna cel maj, neznam) i v rezultat na koeto tova gcc e zdravo broken i e predvideno samo za user space kompilacii, a ne na kernels :). Oba4e s RH 7.2 trqbva da vyrvi i kgcc (tova maj e istinskoto gcc2.95 , ne sym mnogo siguren za versiqta no e naistina ot upstream developers na gcc) . Ta s tri dumi: smqna na gcc s nesto po-4oveshko - 2.95.3 , 2.95.4 smqna na kernela - vanilla =2.4.10 (bez 2.4.11 i 2.4.15) [mislq 4e kernela kojto idva s RH 7.2 e 2.4.9-ac, smenqj go smelo s nqkoj vanilla, stoto ina4e si s forked kernel - s stara VM i t.n. i po-malko hora go nabludavat i pomagat pri problemi... poslednite vanilla 2.4 sa dosta koravi, vypreki 4e az neiskam da se razdelqm s moq 2.4.10 zvqr ;] -- Greets, fr33zb1 === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 February 2002 20:45, you wrote: On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 mashinata e Pentium 150, o/c na 188, 64MB RAM. 10x predvaritelno! ami tokova zhivotno kato gcc-2.96 nqma officialno release-nato ot developers na gcc (vizh na site-a na gcc za da se ubedish). RH sa vzeli edin CVS snapshot na gcc nqkyde okolo 3.0 patch-nali sa go zdravo (s eksperimantalna cel maj, neznam) i v rezultat na koeto tova gcc e zdravo broken i e predvideno samo za user space kompilacii, a ne na kernels :). Oba4e s RH 7.2 trqbva da vyrvi i kgcc (tova maj e istinskoto gcc2.95 , ne sym mnogo siguren za versiqta no e naistina ot upstream developers na gcc) . Ta s tri dumi: smqna na gcc s nesto po-4oveshko - 2.95.3 , 2.95.4 smqna na kernela - vanilla =2.4.10 (bez 2.4.11 i 2.4.15) [mislq 4e kernela kojto idva s RH 7.2 e 2.4.9-ac, smenqj go smelo s nqkoj vanilla, stoto ina4e si s forked kernel - s stara VM i t.n. i po-malko hora go nabludavat i pomagat pri problemi... poslednite vanilla 2.4 sa dosta koravi, vypreki 4e az neiskam da se razdelqm s moq 2.4.10 zvqr ;] Hmm. gcc-2.96 koeto idva s RH-7.2 ne bi triabvalo da ima problemi. ( Ili pone ne 4ak tolkova seriozen problem ). Po4ti edin mesec karah s nego. Po skoro mi prili4a kato OOM killer-a da se razvihria. Vypreki 4e s RH idva kgcc - koeto e gcc-2.91-neshto si ako si compile-vash vanila kernel shte se polzva gcc-to.Probvai da compilirash bez da puskash X i razni sharenii. Ogledai dali predi da SEGFAULT-ne gcc-to ne ti dava niakakvi syobshteniq za greshi v coda koito compilirash. Dori i vanila 2.93 ima edin kup bugove koito kato stigne do greshka ot koiato ne moje da se vyzstanvi compilaciata oshte mnogo redove programen cod SEGFAULT-va. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8bG/nmx3uqe61brwRAinlAJ4vv6a5eKe92Ex7ZAGl8jFgeN8SwgCfVgrw YaZuFCXRBPc4DhZUfGfS5xo= =FCME -END PGP SIGNATURE- === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
Re: lug-bg: gcc error - Segmentation Fault (program cpp0)
On Thursday 14 February 2002 19:29, you wrote: Pri kompilacija na kernel ili drug paket (BIND 9.2.0 naprimer) OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 gcc ver.2.96 kernel 2.4.7; 2.4.9 gcc-to na RH7.2. naistina e bygawo, no ne mislq che e chak do takawa stepen. Po tazi prichina izbqgwam kompilaciite dokolkoto e wyzmovno. Potyrsi si rpm na towa koeto ti trqbwa. Seaga obache se seshtam i drugo: Men edno pc me sbyrka ot preinstalacii, ne moga da kompiliram nito kernel normalno, nito nesto drugo (to beshe sys Slack 8) Okaza se che pametta e sduhana i to nqkyde wyw gornite adresi i se dyni samo kogaro RAM-a se natowari na 100%. (Predi towa mashinata e rabotila sys Win obsto wzeto normalno) Taka che ako iskash idi na www.memtest86.com i testwaj RAM-a. Spas Pavlov === A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
