Re: [lustre-discuss] Awaiting Lustre 2.12.5

[Peter Jones]

Megan

We just tagged 2.12.5 RC1 and testing is underway. Exactly how long until the 
release is GA will depend upon how the testing progresses. If anyone is 
interested in testing ahead of the release being GA then the source is in 
git
 and the builds being tested are on our Jenkins 
server

Peter

From: lustre-discuss  on behalf of 
"Ms. Megan Larko" 
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 9:44 AM
To: Lustre User Discussion Mailing List 
Subject: [lustre-discuss] Awaiting Lustre 2.12.5

Greetings Folks,

I have read that LU-13131 has been addressed and landed in Lustre version 
2.14.0 and 2.12.5.  As most of my current Lustre storage is a 2.12.x, I am 
eager to check-out the fix landed in 2.12.5.  Is there yet any estimate of 
release from the Whamcloud team?

Thanks,
megan
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre client modules

[Leonardo Saavedra]

On 5/26/20 5:47 PM, Phill Harvey-Smith wrote:

Hi all,

Can anyone tell me where to download the Lustere client modules for 
CentOS 7.8 please ?


# uname -a
Linux exec3r420 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 12 16:57:42 
UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003 (Core)


echo "%_topdir  $HOME/rpmbuild" >> .rpmmacros
wget -c 
https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.12.4/el7/client/SRPMS/lustre-2.12.4-1.src.rpm
rpmbuild --clean  --rebuild --without servers --without lustre_tests 
lustre-2.12.4-1.src.rpm

cd $HOME/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64

Leo Saavedra
National Radio Astronomy Observatory
http://www.nrao.edu
+1-575-8357033

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

[lustre-discuss] patchless server vs. patched server

[Pascal Suter]

Hi all

i am currently upgrading a lustre 2.10.3 to 2.12.4 on CentOS 7.7 and I 
am unsure if I should use the patchless or patched server version. what 
is the advantage of still using the patched server version over using 
the patchless variant? From an linux sysadmin point of view I prefer to 
use an unpatched kernel and it would seem unnecessary to still maintain 
a patched variant if they both worked the same in the end.


regards

Pascal

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org