Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-21 Thread Albert Everett
Here's what's in our /etc/modprobe.conf related to IB and lustre:

options ib_mthca msi_x=1
options lnet networks=o2ib0(ib0)
options ko2iblnd ipif_name=ib0

We have Mellanox Infinihost (III?) DDR cards and IPs defined for them.

$ /sbin/ifconfig ib0
ib0   Link encap:InfiniBand  HWaddr 80:00:04:04:FE: 
80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
   inet addr:192.168.2.1  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask: 
255.255.255.0
   inet6 addr: fe80::202:c902:29:b341/64 Scope:Link
   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:65520  Metric:1
   RX packets:1719 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
   TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
   collisions:0 txqueuelen:256
   RX bytes:96564 (94.3 KiB)  TX bytes:2420 (2.3 KiB)

Albert

On Feb 20, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 I have done what you said. I will test my client to the server  
 tomorrow. but would you tell me the tweaks you have done on /etc/ 
 modprobe.conf ?

 On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu  
 wrote:
 For lustre client, we did not need to alter our kernel at all. We  
 just made and installed lustre-1.8.5 and lustre-modules-1.8.5 rpms. / 
 etc/modprobe.conf needs a tweak.

 For lustre server, I believe you will need to deal with a patched  
 kernel. We have not been down this road yet since our vendor  
 includes lustre server software with their hardware.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi Albert,
 It seems that you have made a new kernel in order to run lustre on  
 clients. Am I right?
 I don't want to change kernel on clients at all...

 On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu  
 wrote:
 Our kernel is also 2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.

 We installed OFED 1.5.2 from source, following this guide:

  
 https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Install_OFED_1.5.x_on_a_Rocks_5.3_cluster

 ... which left us, among other things, a folder /usr/src/ofa_kernel.

 Lustre on the server side is handled by our vendor, so all we needed  
 to worry about is the client.

 To build a lustre client, we then installed lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz from  
 source, not from rpms. Our first compile produced the error you show  
 below.
 # ./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 To get the lustre installation to use our new OFED, we tried this  
 and it worked.

 # ./configure --with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel --with-linux=/lib/ 
 modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 RPMs showed up in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64, and we are using  
 lustre-1.8.5*.rpm and lustre-modules-*.rpm on our client machines.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi,
 I have installed lustre client packages on a client node. But it  
 doesn't mount the lustre file system from lustre server. It gets the  
 following famous error:

 $ mount -t lustre 192.168.0.1:/lustre /mnt/lustre
 mount.lustre: mount 172.16.113.232:/lustre at /mnt/lustre failed: No  
 such device
 Are the lustre modules loaded?
 Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems
 Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf


 As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that  
 lustre.ko should be present in this directory:
 /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko

 My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in  
 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead. So I guessed that this may be the  
 source of problem.

 Any ideas?

 Thanks
 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss





___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-21 Thread Arya Mazaheri
Thanks Albert, I really appreciate you...
Now everything is working...


On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu wrote:

 Here's what's in our /etc/modprobe.conf related to IB and lustre:

 options ib_mthca msi_x=1
 options lnet networks=o2ib0(ib0)
 options ko2iblnd ipif_name=ib0

 We have Mellanox Infinihost (III?) DDR cards and IPs defined for them.

 $ /sbin/ifconfig ib0
 ib0   Link encap:InfiniBand  HWaddr
 80:00:04:04:FE:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet addr:192.168.2.1  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::202:c902:29:b341/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:65520  Metric:1
  RX packets:1719 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:256
  RX bytes:96564 (94.3 KiB)  TX bytes:2420 (2.3 KiB)

 Albert


 On Feb 20, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

  I have done what you said. I will test my client to the server tomorrow.
 but would you tell me the tweaks you have done on /etc/modprobe.conf ?

 On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu
 wrote:
 For lustre client, we did not need to alter our kernel at all. We just
 made and installed lustre-1.8.5 and lustre-modules-1.8.5 rpms.
 /etc/modprobe.conf needs a tweak.

 For lustre server, I believe you will need to deal with a patched kernel.
 We have not been down this road yet since our vendor includes lustre server
 software with their hardware.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi Albert,
 It seems that you have made a new kernel in order to run lustre on
 clients. Am I right?
 I don't want to change kernel on clients at all...

 On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu
 wrote:
 Our kernel is also 2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.

 We installed OFED 1.5.2 from source, following this guide:


 https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Install_OFED_1.5.x_on_a_Rocks_5.3_cluster

 ... which left us, among other things, a folder /usr/src/ofa_kernel.

 Lustre on the server side is handled by our vendor, so all we needed to
 worry about is the client.

 To build a lustre client, we then installed lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz from
 source, not from rpms. Our first compile produced the error you show below.
 # ./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 To get the lustre installation to use our new OFED, we tried this and it
 worked.

 # ./configure --with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel
 --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 RPMs showed up in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64, and we are using
 lustre-1.8.5*.rpm and lustre-modules-*.rpm on our client machines.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi,
 I have installed lustre client packages on a client node. But it doesn't
 mount the lustre file system from lustre server. It gets the following
 famous error:

 $ mount -t lustre 192.168.0.1:/lustre /mnt/lustre
 mount.lustre: mount 172.16.113.232:/lustre at /mnt/lustre failed: No such
 device
 Are the lustre modules loaded?
 Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems
 Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf


 As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that lustre.ko
 should be present in this directory:
 /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko

 My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in
 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead. So I guessed that this may be the source of
 problem.

 Any ideas?

 Thanks
 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss






___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-21 Thread Albert Everett
Excellent - thanks for letting us know.

Thanks again to Tim Carlson for his OFED wiki, and to Terascala for  
help with building up the lustre client.

Albert

On Feb 21, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Thanks Albert, I really appreciate you...
 Now everything is working...


 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu  
 wrote:
 Here's what's in our /etc/modprobe.conf related to IB and lustre:

 options ib_mthca msi_x=1
 options lnet networks=o2ib0(ib0)
 options ko2iblnd ipif_name=ib0

 We have Mellanox Infinihost (III?) DDR cards and IPs defined for them.

 $ /sbin/ifconfig ib0
 ib0   Link encap:InfiniBand  HWaddr 80:00:04:04:FE: 
 80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet addr:192.168.2.1  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask: 
 255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::202:c902:29:b341/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:65520  Metric:1
  RX packets:1719 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:256
  RX bytes:96564 (94.3 KiB)  TX bytes:2420 (2.3 KiB)

 Albert


 On Feb 20, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 I have done what you said. I will test my client to the server  
 tomorrow. but would you tell me the tweaks you have done on /etc/ 
 modprobe.conf ?

 On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu  
 wrote:
 For lustre client, we did not need to alter our kernel at all. We  
 just made and installed lustre-1.8.5 and lustre-modules-1.8.5 rpms. / 
 etc/modprobe.conf needs a tweak.

 For lustre server, I believe you will need to deal with a patched  
 kernel. We have not been down this road yet since our vendor  
 includes lustre server software with their hardware.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi Albert,
 It seems that you have made a new kernel in order to run lustre on  
 clients. Am I right?
 I don't want to change kernel on clients at all...

 On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu  
 wrote:
 Our kernel is also 2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.

 We installed OFED 1.5.2 from source, following this guide:

  
 https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Install_OFED_1.5.x_on_a_Rocks_5.3_cluster

 ... which left us, among other things, a folder /usr/src/ofa_kernel.

 Lustre on the server side is handled by our vendor, so all we needed  
 to worry about is the client.

 To build a lustre client, we then installed lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz from  
 source, not from rpms. Our first compile produced the error you show  
 below.
 # ./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 To get the lustre installation to use our new OFED, we tried this  
 and it worked.

 # ./configure --with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel --with-linux=/lib/ 
 modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 RPMs showed up in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64, and we are using  
 lustre-1.8.5*.rpm and lustre-modules-*.rpm on our client machines.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi,
 I have installed lustre client packages on a client node. But it  
 doesn't mount the lustre file system from lustre server. It gets the  
 following famous error:

 $ mount -t lustre 192.168.0.1:/lustre /mnt/lustre
 mount.lustre: mount 172.16.113.232:/lustre at /mnt/lustre failed: No  
 such device
 Are the lustre modules loaded?
 Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems
 Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf


 As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that  
 lustre.ko should be present in this directory:
 /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko

 My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in  
 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead. So I guessed that this may be the  
 source of problem.

 Any ideas?

 Thanks
 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss







___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-20 Thread Arya Mazaheri
I have done what you said. I will test my client to the server tomorrow. but
would you tell me the tweaks you have done on /etc/modprobe.conf ?

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu wrote:

 For lustre client, we did not need to alter our kernel at all. We just made
 and installed lustre-1.8.5 and lustre-modules-1.8.5 rpms. /etc/modprobe.conf
 needs a tweak.

 For lustre server, I believe you will need to deal with a patched kernel.
 We have not been down this road yet since our vendor includes lustre server
 software with their hardware.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

  Hi Albert,
 It seems that you have made a new kernel in order to run lustre on
 clients. Am I right?
 I don't want to change kernel on clients at all...

 On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu
 wrote:
 Our kernel is also 2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.

 We installed OFED 1.5.2 from source, following this guide:


 https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Install_OFED_1.5.x_on_a_Rocks_5.3_cluster

 ... which left us, among other things, a folder /usr/src/ofa_kernel.

 Lustre on the server side is handled by our vendor, so all we needed to
 worry about is the client.

 To build a lustre client, we then installed lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz from
 source, not from rpms. Our first compile produced the error you show below.
 # ./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 To get the lustre installation to use our new OFED, we tried this and it
 worked.

 # ./configure --with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel
 --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 RPMs showed up in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64, and we are using
 lustre-1.8.5*.rpm and lustre-modules-*.rpm on our client machines.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi,
 I have installed lustre client packages on a client node. But it doesn't
 mount the lustre file system from lustre server. It gets the following
 famous error:

 $ mount -t lustre 192.168.0.1:/lustre /mnt/lustre
 mount.lustre: mount 172.16.113.232:/lustre at /mnt/lustre failed: No such
 device
 Are the lustre modules loaded?
 Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems
 Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf


 As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that lustre.ko
 should be present in this directory:
 /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko

 My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in
 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead. So I guessed that this may be the source of
 problem.

 Any ideas?

 Thanks
 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss




___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 11-02-19 09:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:
 
 As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that lustre.ko
 should be present in this directory:
 /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko
 
 My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in
 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead.

You need the client modules package that matches your kernel.  If one is
not available you will have to build it from the source.

b.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Arya Mazaheri
Well, I want to install client module on rocks 5.5 x86_64.
there are some packages in source section of lustre download area. I am
confused which one to choose? what are the differences between them?
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.18_164.11.1.0.1.el5_lustre.2.0.0.1.i686.rpm
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.16_60_0.42.8_lustre.2.0.0.1_smp.x86_64.rpm
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.27_23_0.1_lustre.2.0.0.1_default.x86_64.rpm
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.18_164.11.1.0.1.el5_lustre.2.0.0.1.x86_64.rpm
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.16_60_0.42.8_lustre.2.0.0.1_bigsmp.i686.rpm
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.27_23_0.1_lustre.2.0.0.1_default.i686.rpm
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.18_164.11.1.el5_lustre.2.0.0.1.i686.rpm
lustre-client-source-2.0.0.1-2.6.18_164.11.1.el5_lustre.2.0.0.1.x86_64.rpm

and one other thing! where is the source for lustre-client-modules?

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Brian J. Murrell br...@whamcloud.comwrote:

 On 11-02-19 09:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:
 
  As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that
 lustre.ko
  should be present in this directory:
  /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko
 
  My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in
  2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead.

 You need the client modules package that matches your kernel.  If one is
 not available you will have to build it from the source.

 b.


 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Arya Mazaheri
Hi Albert,
It seems that you have made a new kernel in order to run lustre on clients.
Am I right?
I don't want to change kernel on clients at all...

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu wrote:

 Our kernel is also 2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.

 We installed OFED 1.5.2 from source, following this guide:


 https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Install_OFED_1.5.x_on_a_Rocks_5.3_cluster

 ... which left us, among other things, a folder /usr/src/ofa_kernel.

 Lustre on the server side is handled by our vendor, so all we needed to
 worry about is the client.

 To build a lustre client, we then installed lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz from
 source, not from rpms. Our first compile produced the error you show below.
 # ./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 To get the lustre installation to use our new OFED, we tried this and it
 worked.

 # ./configure --with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel
 --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 RPMs showed up in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64, and we are using
 lustre-1.8.5*.rpm and lustre-modules-*.rpm on our client machines.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

  Hi,
 I have installed lustre client packages on a client node. But it doesn't
 mount the lustre file system from lustre server. It gets the following
 famous error:

 $ mount -t lustre 192.168.0.1:/lustre /mnt/lustre
 mount.lustre: mount 172.16.113.232:/lustre at /mnt/lustre failed: No such
 device
 Are the lustre modules loaded?
 Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems
 Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf


 As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that lustre.ko
 should be present in this directory:
 /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko

 My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in
 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead. So I guessed that this may be the source of
 problem.

 Any ideas?

 Thanks
 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss



___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installing Lustre client on 2.6.18-194 kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Albert Everett
For lustre client, we did not need to alter our kernel at all. We just  
made and installed lustre-1.8.5 and lustre-modules-1.8.5 rpms. /etc/ 
modprobe.conf needs a tweak.

For lustre server, I believe you will need to deal with a patched  
kernel. We have not been down this road yet since our vendor includes  
lustre server software with their hardware.

Albert

On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi Albert,
 It seems that you have made a new kernel in order to run lustre on  
 clients. Am I right?
 I don't want to change kernel on clients at all...

 On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Albert Everett aeever...@ualr.edu  
 wrote:
 Our kernel is also 2.6.18_194.17.4.el5.

 We installed OFED 1.5.2 from source, following this guide:

  
 https://wiki.rocksclusters.org/wiki/index.php/Install_OFED_1.5.x_on_a_Rocks_5.3_cluster

 ... which left us, among other things, a folder /usr/src/ofa_kernel.

 Lustre on the server side is handled by our vendor, so all we needed  
 to worry about is the client.

 To build a lustre client, we then installed lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz from  
 source, not from rpms. Our first compile produced the error you show  
 below.
 # ./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 To get the lustre installation to use our new OFED, we tried this  
 and it worked.

 # ./configure --with-o2ib=/usr/src/ofa_kernel --with-linux=/lib/ 
 modules/`uname -r`/build
 # make rpms

 RPMs showed up in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64, and we are using  
 lustre-1.8.5*.rpm and lustre-modules-*.rpm on our client machines.

 Albert


 On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Arya Mazaheri wrote:

 Hi,
 I have installed lustre client packages on a client node. But it  
 doesn't mount the lustre file system from lustre server. It gets the  
 following famous error:

 $ mount -t lustre 192.168.0.1:/lustre /mnt/lustre
 mount.lustre: mount 172.16.113.232:/lustre at /mnt/lustre failed: No  
 such device
 Are the lustre modules loaded?
 Check /etc/modprobe.conf and /proc/filesystems
 Note 'alias lustre llite' should be removed from modprobe.conf


 As I was searching through the mailing list, I have noticed that  
 lustre.ko should be present in this directory:
 /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5/kernel/fs/lustre/lustre.ko

 My current kernel is 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5. but lustre.ko is in  
 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 instead. So I guessed that this may be the  
 source of problem.

 Any ideas?

 Thanks
 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss



___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss