Re: [Lustre-discuss] split OSTs from single OSS in 2 networks
It does look exactly what I need. Thanks Aurllien. From bugzilla, the patch has been checked in to 1.8. Could someone please point me to the source location? Is it in 1.8.5 - don't believe so, but I thought I would check. If not, would it be in later release of 1.8? thanks all, Haisong On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote: Hello If you want to register different interfaces for different OST on the same OSS, you should use --network options, introduced in patch https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22078 Regards, Aur?lien Haisong Cai a ?crit : I have a storage server that has two QPI contolllers, each controller contols half of the I/O slots. In the first half is a raid controller and 10GbE card, in the second half is a raid controller and a 10GbE card. 4 raid arrays for 4 OSTs of single Lustre filesystem. 2 10GbE, each configured with their own IP and switches, IPSUBNET1 and IPSUBNET2. I want to register OSTs on this OSS with different addresses. That is, OST1 OST2 in IPSUBNET1, OST3 OST4 in IPSUBNET2, and using policy-based routing directing traffic. The idea is to not do the bonding and get as much of bandwidth out of 10GbE NICs as possible. Is it possible? -- ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
Re: [Lustre-discuss] split OSTs from single OSS in 2 networks
Hello If you want to register different interfaces for different OST on the same OSS, you should use --network options, introduced in patch https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22078 Regards, Aurélien Haisong Cai a écrit : I have a storage server that has two QPI contolllers, each controller contols half of the I/O slots. In the first half is a raid controller and 10GbE card, in the second half is a raid controller and a 10GbE card. 4 raid arrays for 4 OSTs of single Lustre filesystem. 2 10GbE, each configured with their own IP and switches, IPSUBNET1 and IPSUBNET2. I want to register OSTs on this OSS with different addresses. That is, OST1 OST2 in IPSUBNET1, OST3 OST4 in IPSUBNET2, and using policy-based routing directing traffic. The idea is to not do the bonding and get as much of bandwidth out of 10GbE NICs as possible. Is it possible? ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
[Lustre-discuss] split OSTs from single OSS in 2 networks
I have a storage server that has two QPI contolllers, each controller contols half of the I/O slots. In the first half is a raid controller and 10GbE card, in the second half is a raid controller and a 10GbE card. 4 raid arrays for 4 OSTs of single Lustre filesystem. 2 10GbE, each configured with their own IP and switches, IPSUBNET1 and IPSUBNET2. I want to register OSTs on this OSS with different addresses. That is, OST1 OST2 in IPSUBNET1, OST3 OST4 in IPSUBNET2, and using policy-based routing directing traffic. The idea is to not do the bonding and get as much of bandwidth out of 10GbE NICs as possible. Is it possible? -- thanks, Haisong ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
