Dear all,

considering NVME storage for the next MDS.

As I understand, NVME disks are bundled in software, not by a hardware raid 
controller.
This would be done using Linux software raid, mdadm, correct?

We have some experience with ZFS, which we use on our OSTs.
But I would like to stick to ldiskfs for the MDTs, and a zpool with a zvol on 
top which is then formatted with ldiskfs - to much voodoo...

How is this handled elsewhere? Any experiences?


The available devices are quite large. If I create a raid-10 out of 4 disks, e.g. 7 TB each, my MDT will be 14 TB - already close to the 16 TB limit. So no need for a box with lots of U.3 slots.

But for MDS operations, we will still need a powerful dual-CPU system with lots 
of RAM.
Then the NVME devices should be distributed between the CPUs?
Is there a way to pinpoint this in a call for tender?


Best regards,
Thomas

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Roth

GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH
Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany, www.gsi.de

Commercial Register / Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 1528
Managing Directors / Geschäftsführung:
Professor Dr. Paolo Giubellino, Dr. Ulrich Breuer, Jörg Blaurock
Chairman of the Supervisory Board / Vorsitzender des GSI-Aufsichtsrats:
State Secretary / Staatssekretär Dr. Volkmar Dietz


_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
  • [... Thomas Roth via lustre-discuss
    • ... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss
      • ... Cameron Harr via lustre-discuss
        • ... Thomas Roth via lustre-discuss
          • ... Jeff Johnson
            • ... Cameron Harr via lustre-discuss
              • ... Thomas Roth via lustre-discuss
                • ... Cameron Harr via lustre-discuss
      • ... Vinícius Ferrão via lustre-discuss
        • ... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss

Reply via email to