[lustre-discuss] lfs check *, change of behaviour from 2.7 to 2.10?

2019-04-10 Thread Ms. Megan Larko
Data point relating to the lfs check item below:
Using lustre server version 2.10.4 and lustre client version 2.10.7 the
unprivileged user still receives the message "error: check: mds status
failed" in response to "lfs check mds".   Ditto for ost check.   The "lfs
check" command responds properly if run by the root user.

megan

>From the lustre-discuss:
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:50:12 +1000
From: Andrew Elwell 
To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-discuss] lfs check *, change of behaviour from 2.7 to
2.10?
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I've just noticed that 'lfs check mds / servers no longer works (2.10.0 or
greater clients) for unprivileged users, yet it worked for 2.7.x clients.

Is this by design?
(lfs quota thankfully still works as a normal user tho)


Andrew
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


[lustre-discuss] lfs check *, change of behaviour from 2.7 to 2.10?

2019-04-09 Thread Andrew Elwell
I've just noticed that 'lfs check mds / servers no longer works (2.10.0 or
greater clients) for unprivileged users, yet it worked for 2.7.x clients.

Is this by design?
(lfs quota thankfully still works as a normal user tho)


Andrew
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org