Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Steve Thompson

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Bob Ball via lustre-discuss wrote:


Secure Linux?


Good idea, but it is disabled during kickstart.

--

Steve Thompson E-mail:  smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC   Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
3901 N Charles St  VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Baltimore MD 21218
  "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Degremont, Aurelien via lustre-discuss
I see that you are using dkms version of lustre module.
I would check that, it is possible that the dkms build trigger a client-only 
build of Lustre ? (missing deps, etc...)
Could you check the list of Lustre modules built and installed by dkms between 
the 2 working OSSes and the 4 others?


Aurélien

Le 26/04/2021 18:27, « Steve Thompson »  a écrit :

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
content is safe.



On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Degremont, Aurelien wrote:

> Could you provide more debugging information, like 'rpm -qa | grep 
lustre' on both hosts?
> The actual mount command, etc...
>
> There must be something different, as the result is different...

Yes, I believe that something must be different; I just cannot find it. I
now have six OST systems. All were installed the same way; two work fine
and four do not. The rpm list:

# rpm -qa | grep lustre
lustre-osd-zfs-mount-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-zfs-dkms-2.12.6-1.el7.noarch

# the mount command example:
# grep lustre /etc/fstab
fs1/ost1/mnt/fs1/ost1   lustre defaults,_netdev_  0 0

and all are the same on all six systems. I currently have ZFS 0.8.5
installed, but I have tried with ZFS 0.7.13, and the results are
the same.

Steve
--

Steve Thompson E-mail:  smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC   Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
3901 N Charles St  VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Baltimore MD 21218
   "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"


___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Bob Ball via lustre-discuss

Secure Linux?

bob

On 4/26/2021 12:26 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Degremont, Aurelien wrote:

Could you provide more debugging information, like 'rpm -qa | grep 
lustre' on both hosts?

The actual mount command, etc...

There must be something different, as the result is different...


Yes, I believe that something must be different; I just cannot find 
it. I now have six OST systems. All were installed the same way; two 
work fine and four do not. The rpm list:


# rpm -qa | grep lustre
lustre-osd-zfs-mount-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-zfs-dkms-2.12.6-1.el7.noarch

# the mount command example:
# grep lustre /etc/fstab
fs1/ost1    /mnt/fs1/ost1   lustre defaults,_netdev_  0 0

and all are the same on all six systems. I currently have ZFS 0.8.5 
installed, but I have tried with ZFS 0.7.13, and the results are

the same.

Steve


___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Steve Thompson

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Degremont, Aurelien wrote:


Could you provide more debugging information, like 'rpm -qa | grep lustre' on 
both hosts?
The actual mount command, etc...

There must be something different, as the result is different...


Yes, I believe that something must be different; I just cannot find it. I 
now have six OST systems. All were installed the same way; two work fine 
and four do not. The rpm list:


# rpm -qa | grep lustre
lustre-osd-zfs-mount-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-2.12.6-1.el7.x86_64
lustre-zfs-dkms-2.12.6-1.el7.noarch

# the mount command example:
# grep lustre /etc/fstab
fs1/ost1/mnt/fs1/ost1   lustre defaults,_netdev_  0 0

and all are the same on all six systems. I currently have ZFS 0.8.5 
installed, but I have tried with ZFS 0.7.13, and the results are

the same.

Steve
--

Steve Thompson E-mail:  smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC   Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
3901 N Charles St  VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Baltimore MD 21218
  "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Degremont, Aurelien via lustre-discuss
Could you provide more debugging information, like 'rpm -qa | grep lustre' on 
both hosts?
The actual mount command, etc...

There must be something different, as the result is different...



Le 26/04/2021 16:25, « Steve Thompson »  a écrit :

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
content is safe.



On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Degremont, Aurelien wrote:

> Le 26/04/2021 09:34, ? Degremont, Aurelien ?  a 
?crit :
>
>This message appears when you are using Lustre modules built with
>only client support, with server support disabled. This message is
>quite new and only appears in very recent Lustre releases.
>
> Actually I double-checked that and this is not true. It does exist with 
Lustre 2.12.6
>
> Just looks like you installed a client-only version of Lustre RPMs...

Unfortunately this isn't true. I installed the RPM's on the working and
non-working systems from the same place:

[lustre-server]
name=lustre-server

baseurl=https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-release/el7/server
gpgcheck=0

Steve
--

Steve Thompson E-mail:  smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC   Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
3901 N Charles St  VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Baltimore MD 21218
   "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"


___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Steve Thompson

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Degremont, Aurelien wrote:


Le 26/04/2021 09:34, ? Degremont, Aurelien ?  a ?crit :

   This message appears when you are using Lustre modules built with
   only client support, with server support disabled. This message is
   quite new and only appears in very recent Lustre releases.

Actually I double-checked that and this is not true. It does exist with Lustre 
2.12.6

Just looks like you installed a client-only version of Lustre RPMs...


Unfortunately this isn't true. I installed the RPM's on the working and 
non-working systems from the same place:


[lustre-server]
name=lustre-server
baseurl=https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-release/el7/server
gpgcheck=0

Steve
--

Steve Thompson E-mail:  smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC   Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
3901 N Charles St  VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Baltimore MD 21218
  "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Degremont, Aurelien via lustre-discuss


Le 26/04/2021 09:34, « Degremont, Aurelien »  a écrit :


This message appears when you are using Lustre modules built with only 
client support, with server support disabled.
This message is quite new and only appears in very recent Lustre releases.

Actually I double-checked that and this is not true. It does exist with Lustre 
2.12.6

Just looks like you installed a client-only version of Lustre RPMs...

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [lustre-discuss] OST mount issue

2021-04-26 Thread Degremont, Aurelien via lustre-discuss
Hello Steve,

This message appears when you are using Lustre modules built with only client 
support, with server support disabled.
This message is quite new and only appears in very recent Lustre releases. What 
Lustre version are you using, this error does not exist in 2.12.6 as far as I 
know.

Could you double check the Lustre version and RPMs you installed on that host, 
compare with the other and ensure they are the same?
Could you simply try: 'modprobe mdt' and see if that works?

Check also: 'lctl get_param version'

Aurélien

Le 25/04/2021 15:10, « lustre-discuss au nom de Steve Thompson » 
 a écrit :

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
content is safe.



Two CentOS 7.9 hosts with kernel 3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64, using ZFS
0.8.5 with lustre 2.12.6. One system works perfectly, whereas the second
host fails to mount the OST, with this message from the mount:

mount.lustre: mount fs1/ost1 at /mnt/fs1/ost1 failed: Invalid argument

and this confusing message in the log:

Apr 25 08:56:18 fs1 kernel: LustreError: 
27722:0:(obd_mount.c:1597:lustre_fill_super())
This is client-side-only module, cannot handle server mount.

Can someone please point me to the error? BTW, the two systems were both
kickstarted from the same repo, so as far as I can tell, they are
identical. The lustre RPMs were installed from the server repo.

Steve

--

Steve Thompson E-mail:  smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC   Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
3901 N Charles St  VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Baltimore MD 21218
   "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


Re: [Lustre-discuss] ost mount issue

2008-06-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:56 +0530, anil kumar wrote:
>  
> hostname: lustre-02 (OST server)
> 1) mkfs.lustre --fsnam datafs --ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/hda2
> 2) mkfs.lustre --fsname datafs --ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/hda3

Why do you specify two different MGSes to each of the format commands?
If you change that second one to be the same as the first, that will
probably resolve your problem.

b.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss