Re: Antwort: Re: Mudarra's bordon

2005-06-01 Thread Michael Thames

Hi Michael,

actually italian tab is quite easy. Just imagine to look *through* your
lute and you'll see the numbers just on the right position.

Hi Thomas,
  Very help tip, that made it much easier.
Michael Thames
www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:38 AM
Subject: Antwort: Re: Mudarra's bordon







 Hi Michael,

 actually italian tab is quite easy. Just imagine to look *through* your
 lute and you'll see the numbers just on the right position.
 Only the 8th - 14th course sometimes have odd signs one might need to get
 used to.
 I found most italian facsimiles easier to read than english facsimiles.
The
 only disadvantage is that it's not so easy to add and later to recognize
 fingerings for the left hand which I would write in numbers.

 Best wishes
 Thomas





 Michael Thames [EMAIL PROTECTED] am 31.05.2005 16:08:14

 An:Lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu, Sean Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Kopie:

 Thema: Re: Mudarra's bordon

 Sean,
   Thanks for the encouragement, I was hopping  someone with experience
with
 Italian Tab. would find it attainable with a little effort, and spur me
on.
I much prefer to read from facsimiles.
   I bit the bullet a few months ago, and got the facsimiles of
both
 the London, and Dresden MS. edited by DAS.
  BTW, OMI in NY has a compressive catalogue of Facsimiles, for guitar
 and lute.
The Capriola in color is $33  ,and the Dalsa, is $38.
 http://www.omifacsimiles.com/mgencatalogs.html
 Michael Thames
 www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Sean Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 11:52 PM
 Subject: Re: Mudarra's bordon


 
  Dear Michael,
 
  Italian tab is indeed learnable. I put it off for 20 years and then
  lived it with it exclusively for a week and found it no biggy. I
  started with single line pieces such as Francesco's canon and then
  worked my way into dances w/ simple bass lines and then on to the
  ricercares. Eventually I saw all the same patterns I remembered from
  French tab and it just fell into place.
 
  The Capirola book is one of the finest sources of late 15th cent lute
  music. Some of Josquin's, Agricola's and Brumel's fine motets are there
  and intabulated very well. Some of the biggest hits of the 15th century
  are also found there: Ales Regrets and Nunquam fuit as well as a few
  popular current songs and the dances you mentioned. It's a wonderfully
  alive period of music and Capirola reflects this nicely.
 
  There are so few mistakes and it is written so clearly that a modern
  edition is superfluous --and you probably won't get all the cool and
  humorous pictures! I remember seeing Jacob Heringmann give his Josquin
  concert and he simply played from the facsimile. If you were interested
  in further notes about it then I would second Denys' suggestion of the
  Otto Gombosi book which should be available in any decent college music
  library. Btw, Capirola's introduction is translated at Federico
  Marincola's Lutebot site:
  http://www.marincola.com/lutebot1.txt
 
  On the 4th course octave question. With a little practice and focus you
  can either accentuate or downplay the octave jangle as you see fit with
  either fingers or thumb. It's more a question of attack.
 
  Good luck,
  Sean
 
 
 
  On May 30, 2005, at 8:58 PM, Michael Thames wrote:
 
   Dear Michael,
   I understand why you are confused now!
   You are not looking at the original.
  
 Denys and Leonard,
   Thanks for the info. I can see now why I was confused.
  
I've always been afraid of Italian tab. However, considering that 90%
   of
   the ren. lute music I play is early Italian perhaps I should make a
   effort
   to read Italian Tab?
  
   Just in case.Has anyone produced a good reliable edition of
   Dalsa,
   Spinacino, and Capriola in French Tab. for 6 course lute?
  
I was at a Master class with Paul Odette, and had just began
   playing a
   6 course lute with an octave on the 4th course.  I mentioned how
   strange it
   sounded to me after playing an 8 course with the unison 4th course.
Paul then started to demonstrate  many examples of the advantages
   of an
   octave on the 4th course.  One of the examples was the Padoana by
   Capriola,
   which if I remember correctly he only played the octave at certain
   times, of
   the fourth course?  Is this what is meant as splitting a course?
   Denys, thanks for the Dalsa peices I love this stuff!
  
   Michael Thames
   www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
   - Original Message -
   From: Denys Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: lute net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 5:39 AM
   Subject: Re: Mudarra's bordon
  
  
   Dear Michael,
   I understand why you are confused now!
   You are not looking at the original.
  
   I 

Re: symm/asymm perfect/imperfect

2005-06-01 Thread Vance Wood
You are still missing the point.  The moulds my be symmetrical, and the
necks symmetrical, but do the plans and drawings show a symmetrical
alignment between both elements?

Vance Wood.
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Thames [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vance
Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: symm/asymm  perfect/imperfect


 Vance said
   The point here is that the
 use of asymmetry was to create the illusion of symmetry.

  Why would anyone want the illusion of symmetry, when one can have the
 real thing?  Stradivari obviously thought very highly of symmetry, since
all
 of his moulds are symmetrical.

 Michael Thames
 www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Vance Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: lute list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 9:28 AM
 Subject: Re: symm/asymm  perfect/imperfect


  After reading Mr. Lundbergs book several times I have come to the
 conclusion
  that he must be correct.  He claims to have examined actual instruments
 that
  all show the same asymmetry, the neck cocked toward the base side of the
  Lute.  He goes on to explain that the body does indeed have a center
line,
  and the neck does indeed have a center line, but the juxtaposition of
both
  elements does not extend the two center lines so that they become one
 common
  center line.  Can anyone site an historical instrument where a common
 center
  line is obvious?
 
  I realize the argument can be made that the instruments have become
warped
  and twisted over time but knowing wood as I do, if that were so, there
 would
  be evidence in a dramatic distortion of both the treble and base sides
of
  the bowel.  The base side would show evidence of compression causing an
  obvious kink near the joint of the neck and bowel.  The treble side
would
  show evidence of separation at the same point understanding that wood
this
  old cannot be stretched, it only cracks and separates.
 
  Vance Wood.
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:15 PM
  Subject: RE: symm/asymm  perfect/imperfect
 
 
   Ron Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
  
Hi Michael,
   
Going back to your initial posting about lute symmetry.  In the
Stradivari workshop on your recent trip to Italy, you saw a paper
template for a lute body, folded along the centre-line.
  
   Is it clear how this template was used?
  
   I can see many possibiltys, including the possiblity of other
templates
   now missing.
  
   Perhaps this was part of a study, and represents another makers work;
   are there any strad-made lutes surviving to compare this template to?
  
   Sorry, i suppose lots of this has been discussed already, I have been
   skipping lots of email the past few weeks, too much apparant flaming,
   not enough time to indulge in reading, let alone responding.
   --
   dana emery
  
  
  
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html