[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: le Tocsein de Gautier

2008-12-29 Thread Jorge Torres

Dear list:

A few thoughts concerning the French duple-meter gigue.

1) The two examples of Toxin are not in 4/4 there is no time signature  
given.  They are probably both in Binarie mineur or cut time or 2/2,  
again, see Perrine's distinction between an allemande and a gigue in  
his pieces, p. 16-19.  This makes a huge difference in the way we  
would play them.


2) In this repertoire, Allemandes and Gigues are, at times, almost  
indistinguishable, as evidenced by Perrine's distinction between an  
allemande and a gigue in his pieces, p. 16-19


3)  There is no evidence to assume that these gigues should be played  
very fast.


4) I would not force a a ternary subdivision as a uniform rhythm (6/8  
or 12/8).  The French had a ternary, gigue-like genre: the canarie


5) It is very likely that notes inegales were used in these pieces,  
but to insist on them throughout the piece in order to change the  
rhythm to something that sounds more like 6/8 or 12/8 seems pedantic  
to me.


All the best,
Jorge Torres

On Dec 28, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Mathias Rösel wrote:


I would imagine it could be binary.


Both Tocxin by Denis Gaultier and Toxin by Charles Mouton are gigues  
in

4/4 metre. I'd go so far as to say that there's a relationship
discernible between the pieces of master and student in that both  
gigues

have a very similar opening motif and both share the same rhythmic
pattern in each measure of their respective second halves, i. e. with
the bass note off-beat on 2nd half of 1st beat. That repeated bass  
note

even being a 4 in both pieces (notwithstanding that it means B with
Gaultier, C sharp with Mouton).

With what I heard with Froberger gigues transferred to these 4/4  
gigues,

you would play them extremely inegale, IOW amounts of crotchets as
sharpened ternary units. Gaultier seems to indicate that way of  
playing

by stating rhythm more precisely in each one but last measure of both
halves of his gigue.

Still, would you perform Tocsin as loud and fast as possible, i. e.
raising connotations of alarm? Mouton seems to indicate something of
that kind by using means of chromatic escalation at the conclusions of
the 1st half.

Mathias


Tocxin is tocsin in both French and English, an alarm bell which is
musically depicted by the repeated bass notes.

My former question was concerned with tempo. If it is agreed that
alarm
bells would usually be chimed as loud and fast as possible in case  
of

emergency, was the gigue which bears that name supposed to be played
that way, too?
It's a sequel, so to say, of a short discussion that we had in
December
2003 (Re: binary and ternary GIGUES).

Mathias


Anthony Hind anthony.h...@noos.fr schrieb:

Damian
Sonner le tocsin, meant roughly to ring a peal of warning
bells , but could also mean the bell used for such a warning. This
would have come from earlier touquesain from Provencal  
tocaseneh.

It seems that tocar (or toquer), distantly related to touch,
comes from Latin toccre make a sound like toc.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-touch.html
and senh could be derived from Latin signum a sign - a signal,
giving ancient French seing, later sein, and which took on the
meaning of bell.

My source is the historic dictionary of the French language, le
Robert, but etymology of a single expression, even backed-up by  
such

a dictionary  is rarely safe.
Around 1570 and for a certain period, the expression apparently  
took

on a metaphoric meaning (Bossuet) to allert public oppinion.
Best wishes
Anthony


Le 28 déc. 08 à 02:51, damian dlugolecki a écrit :


You are quite right David.  I just looked up 'tocsin' in my OED
where the earliest usage in English is in 1598.   I just assumed  
it

was an earlier spelling of 'toxin' which led me to my incorrect
interpretation.   Never encountered the word 'tocsin' with that
meaning.  The OED reads, an alarm signal, sounded by ringing a
bell or bells; used orig. and esp. in reference to France.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Damian


Subject: [LUTE] Re: le Tocsein de Gautier



I might have missed something here, getting into the discussion
late
(I rejoined today---hellew everyone), but doesn't the English  
word
tocsin refer to the pealing of a bell?  I always thought  
tocsin
came from an old form of French.  Could some form of the word  
have
existed in French in the 17th century with a similar meaning?   
Used

perhaps in similar sense to Vallet's piece depicting bells in a
village church.

Davidr
dlu...@verizon.net



On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:48 PM, damian dlugolecki wrote:

At the moment this is only a guess, but I believe the 'tocsin'  
of

Mouton and that of D. Gautier have something to do with disease.
The word 'toxin' only come into the English language during the
19th century.  My OED defines it originally as
A specific poison...produced by a microbe which causes a
particular disease.'  By this perhaps we can infer that this
was closer to the original French meaning than to our current

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: le Tocsein de Gautier

2008-12-29 Thread Jerzy Zak

Dear Jorge and others,

Years ago I've placed the question of binary and ternary GIGUES on  
this list (11th Dec. 2003) and the discussion wasn't much conclusive  
then, I must say - you can read it in the archive.


On 2008-12-29, at 16:22, Jorge Torres wrote:

Dear list:
A few thoughts concerning the French duple-meter gigue.

1) The two examples of Toxin are not in 4/4 there is no time  
signature given.


In the whole Mouton book there are no time signatures (including  
copies in Milleran).



They are probably both in Binarie mineur or cut time or 2/2,


Funny names - where from are they?

again, see Perrine's distinction between an allemande and a gigue  
in his pieces, p. 16-19.  This makes a huge difference in the way  
we would play them.


In most cases Perrine changes pairs of eights into a doted pair,  
which in turn can mean in performance inegale playing - doesn't it?


2) In this repertoire, Allemandes and Gigues are, at times, almost  
indistinguishable, as evidenced by Perrine's distinction between an  
allemande and a gigue in his pieces, p. 16-19


almost indistinguishable in notation, but not in performance, of  
course…


3)  There is no evidence to assume that these gigues should be  
played very fast.


There is at all no evidence how these gigues _should_ be played. Even  
an advice from an experienced historical dance specialist is of  
little use, as these are purely instrumental chamber private social  
(!) reminiscences of the dance.


4) I would not force a a ternary subdivision as a uniform rhythm  
(6/8 or 12/8).  The French had a ternary, gigue-like genre: the  
canarie


The French had ternary Courante, Menuet, Sarabande, Canarie…, why not  
also a Gigue? Each of them is different, also a Gigue. But only a  
Gigue causes so much problems becouse of the varied way of notating  
it. Only in one book of Reusner (1676) there are four ways of writing  
it down: in 4/4, 3/8, 3/4, 3/2. Who can explain the misterious  
diferences in perfomance? The French were even less explicite in  
notation, as is generally known.


5) It is very likely that notes inegales were used in these pieces,  
but to insist on them throughout the piece in order to change the  
rhythm to something that sounds more like 6/8 or 12/8 seems  
pedantic to me.


That seems to you, perhaps the other way may seem to me, still  
someone can feel it slighty different… That's not the way to  
justify your point here. If you appeare on stage (not youtube) before  
a non-casual audience you take the responsibility of you  
interpretative choices. There you have a chance to be an Artist with  
your intuition.


Here we are speculating verbally and are trying to find hard  
evidence, …but even on the territory of keyboard research (see e.g. a  
discussion on Froberger:

http://sscm-jscm.press.uiuc.edu/v13/no1/schulenberg.html#_edn59
- f.58, and other links on the Society's page) there is no egreement  
what to do with the 4/4 specimen.


Are there some news on the subject?
Yours,
Jurek
___



All the best,
Jorge Torres

On Dec 28, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Mathias Rösel wrote:


I would imagine it could be binary.


Both Tocxin by Denis Gaultier and Toxin by Charles Mouton are  
gigues in

4/4 metre. I'd go so far as to say that there's a relationship
discernible between the pieces of master and student in that both  
gigues

have a very similar opening motif and both share the same rhythmic
pattern in each measure of their respective second halves, i. e. with
the bass note off-beat on 2nd half of 1st beat. That repeated bass  
note

even being a 4 in both pieces (notwithstanding that it means B with
Gaultier, C sharp with Mouton).

With what I heard with Froberger gigues transferred to these 4/4  
gigues,

you would play them extremely inegale, IOW amounts of crotchets as
sharpened ternary units. Gaultier seems to indicate that way of  
playing

by stating rhythm more precisely in each one but last measure of both
halves of his gigue.

Still, would you perform Tocsin as loud and fast as possible, i. e.
raising connotations of alarm? Mouton seems to indicate something of
that kind by using means of chromatic escalation at the  
conclusions of

the 1st half.

Mathias


Tocxin is tocsin in both French and English, an alarm bell which is
musically depicted by the repeated bass notes.

My former question was concerned with tempo. If it is agreed that
alarm
bells would usually be chimed as loud and fast as possible in  
case of
emergency, was the gigue which bears that name supposed to be  
played

that way, too?
It's a sequel, so to say, of a short discussion that we had in
December
2003 (Re: binary and ternary GIGUES).

Mathias


Anthony Hind anthony.h...@noos.fr schrieb:

Damian
Sonner le tocsin, meant roughly to ring a peal of warning
bells , but could also mean the bell used for such a warning.  
This
would have come from earlier touquesain from Provencal  
tocaseneh.

It seems that tocar (or toquer), distantly 

[LUTE] Messiah

2008-12-29 Thread William Brohinsky
Colligenous Trenchan...never mind.

Lute folk,

A few years back, I used to run a very loose Sing It Yourself Messiah
in these parts. Basically, instead of the carefully rehearsed
orchestra and soloists with 'pick up' chorus, we just gathered a very
small core band (in those days, just a string trio) and then
supplemented with any string player, oboist and bassoonist who wanted
to play, chose the soloists out of the volunteer chorus (or used the
whole section if no one felt brave enough to volunteer), and went for
it. We did this three times, then between my wife's heart problems, my
going to college (just graduated) and other things, we stopped doing
it.

This year, I succumbed to the requests and will be doing it again.

The core orchestra has grown some (I actually had a full quartet and
the bassoonist came for one rehersal), and some of the folk who are
going to add to the orchestra will be quite talented amateurs. The
choir and soloists are still going to be up-for-grabs. It is
guaranteed to be fun (since most of the people who get horribly bored
between the Pifa and Why do the Nations don't come.)

However, this year has been pretty busy, and I totally forgot to
invite a harpsichord player. For the most part, this is ok: we're well
covered for the choros and Arias, but some of the Recitativos can be
painful without some kind of continuo.

We're doing it this afternoon. I have a theorbo-like instrument which
I'm not afraid to use. But I'm only just sitting down to write out
tab, because I'm going to be too busy getting people through their
solos to be improvising.

Has anyone else done this already, who would be willing to share? I'm
conducting the whole thing, so all I need are the Recit's.

I'd be very grateful.

ray



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Good 2009

2008-12-29 Thread Rebecca Banks
   December 29th, 2008

   Dear Lutenists:

  It might have been better with gut stringing
Horrendous - if it wasn't Christmas I would laugh.
   Although, to err on the side of human, at least there was passion,

   All the best in the New Year,

   with thanks,

   Rebecca Banks
   Tea at Tympani Lane Records
   [1]www.tympanilanerecords.com
 __

   Share your holiday memories for free with Windows LiveT Photos. [2]Get
   started now. --

References

   1. http://www.tympanilanerecords.com/
   2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/photos.aspx


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Holborne's New Year's Gift

2008-12-29 Thread Stuart Walsh

As it's the time of year

Here's an online version from Serge Garbode's site


http://www.gerbode.net/ft2/composers/Holborne/pdf/galliard_new_years_gift.pdf


I haven't looked at this in years...It's a tricky one, I think - and I 
can't find a version of it played on a lute.



There are no varied repeats. And the first strain surely has to go at a 
reasonable pace? The melody is moving in crotchets, presumably so if it 
is some sort of dance it has to move a bit. That makes bar 12 a bit of a 
thing but the scale is just a sort of flourish perhaps. It feels like 
the first two sections should move quickly - with the simple melody 
flowing. But that makes the long third section very busy indeed. I'm not 
quite sure what's going on. At speed I wonder if it is worth making an 
elaborate fingering in bar26 with LH4 on the tab note on on the sixth 
course?


Anyway, here's a rough go at it - with some scrabbling about in the 
third section and a very obviously missed bass in the very final bar.


It might be interesting to hear other versions


http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/NewYear.mp3


Stuart



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Holborne's New Year's Gift

2008-12-29 Thread EUGENE BRAIG IV

- Original Message -
From: Stuart Walsh s.wa...@ntlworld.com
Date: Monday, December 29, 2008 6:52 pm
Subject: [LUTE] Holborne's  New Year's Gift
To: Lute Net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 
 I haven't looked at this in years...It's a tricky one, I think - 
 and I can't find a version of it played on a lute.

Here's one:

Marincola, Federico. 1995. Holborne: Pieces for Lute. Disques Pierre Verany, 
PV795112.

An excellent disc, but I'm afraid it's no longer easy to find for sale.

Best,
Eugene



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: le Tocsein de Gautier

2008-12-29 Thread damian dlugolecki


I quite agree with Jorge Torres.  After playing these pieces 
for a while it really seems to me the accents are duple; 
accent on the 1st note of each semi-breve.


DD

Dear list:

A few thoughts concerning the French duple-meter gigue.

1) The two examples of Toxin are not in 4/4 there is no time 
signature
given.  They are probably both in Binarie mineur or cut time 
or 2/2,
again, see Perrine's distinction between an allemande and a 
gigue in
his pieces, p. 16-19.  This makes a huge difference in the 
way we

would play them.

2) In this repertoire, Allemandes and Gigues are, at times, 
almost
indistinguishable, as evidenced by Perrine's distinction 
between an

allemande and a gigue in his pieces, p. 16-19

3)  There is no evidence to assume that these gigues should be 
played

very fast.

4) I would not force a a ternary subdivision as a uniform 
rhythm (6/8
or 12/8).  The French had a ternary, gigue-like genre: the 
canarie


5) It is very likely that notes inegales were used in these 
pieces,
but to insist on them throughout the piece in order to change 
the
rhythm to something that sounds more like 6/8 or 12/8 seems 
pedantic

to me.

All the best,
Jorge Torres

On Dec 28, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Mathias Rösel wrote:


I would imagine it could be binary.


Both Tocxin by Denis Gaultier and Toxin by Charles Mouton 
are gigues  in
4/4 metre. I'd go so far as to say that there's a 
relationship
discernible between the pieces of master and student in that 
both  gigues
have a very similar opening motif and both share the same 
rhythmic
pattern in each measure of their respective second halves, 
i. e. with
the bass note off-beat on 2nd half of 1st beat. That 
repeated bass  note
even being a 4 in both pieces (notwithstanding that it means 
B with

Gaultier, C sharp with Mouton).

With what I heard with Froberger gigues transferred to these 
4/4  gigues,
you would play them extremely inegale, IOW amounts of 
crotchets as
sharpened ternary units. Gaultier seems to indicate that way 
of  playing
by stating rhythm more precisely in each one but last 
measure of both

halves of his gigue.

Still, would you perform Tocsin as loud and fast as 
possible, i. e.
raising connotations of alarm? Mouton seems to indicate 
something of
that kind by using means of chromatic escalation at the 
conclusions of

the 1st half.

Mathias

Tocxin is tocsin in both French and English, an alarm bell 
which is

musically depicted by the repeated bass notes.

My former question was concerned with tempo. If it is 
agreed that

alarm
bells would usually be chimed as loud and fast as possible 
in case  of
emergency, was the gigue which bears that name supposed to 
be played

that way, too?
It's a sequel, so to say, of a short discussion that we 
had in

December
2003 (Re: binary and ternary GIGUES).

Mathias


Anthony Hind anthony.h...@noos.fr schrieb:

Damian
Sonner le tocsin, meant roughly to ring a peal of 
warning
bells , but could also mean the bell used for such a 
warning. This
would have come from earlier touquesain from Provencal 
tocaseneh.
It seems that tocar (or toquer), distantly related to 
touch,

comes from Latin toccre make a sound like toc.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-touch.html
and senh could be derived from Latin signum a sign - 
a signal,
giving ancient French seing, later sein, and which 
took on the

meaning of bell.

My source is the historic dictionary of the French 
language, le
Robert, but etymology of a single expression, even 
backed-up by  such

a dictionary  is rarely safe.
Around 1570 and for a certain period, the expression 
apparently  took
on a metaphoric meaning (Bossuet) to allert public 
oppinion.

Best wishes
Anthony


Le 28 déc. 08 à 02:51, damian dlugolecki a écrit :

You are quite right David.  I just looked up 'tocsin' in 
my OED
where the earliest usage in English is in 1598.   I just 
assumed  it
was an earlier spelling of 'toxin' which led me to my 
incorrect
interpretation.   Never encountered the word 'tocsin' 
with that
meaning.  The OED reads, an alarm signal, sounded by 
ringing a
bell or bells; used orig. and esp. in reference to 
France.


Thanks for clearing that up.

Damian


Subject: [LUTE] Re: le Tocsein de Gautier


I might have missed something here, getting into the 
discussion

late
(I rejoined today---hellew everyone), but doesn't the 
English  word
tocsin refer to the pealing of a bell?  I always 
thought  tocsin
came from an old form of French.  Could some form of 
the word  have
existed in French in the 17th century with a similar 
meaning?   Used
perhaps in similar sense to Vallet's piece depicting 
bells in a

village church.

Davidr
dlu...@verizon.net



On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:48 PM, damian dlugolecki wrote:

At the moment this is only a guess, but I believe the 
'tocsin'  of
Mouton and that of D. Gautier have something to do 
with disease.
The word 'toxin' only come into the English language 
during the

19th century.  My OED defines it originally as
A