[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?

2009-10-25 Thread Dale Young
Blablablabla. the're all dead! We know nothing! We make it all up as we go. 
What sounds good? Octave 6th is as annoying as short appogiaturas in galant 
musik..  and Roman agrees with ME. so there!   ( the cheque's in the mail) 
nudgenudgewinkwink,  say no more!


C/B/d
- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Shoskes dshos...@mac.com

To: chriswi...@yahoo.com
Cc: BAROQUE-LUTE baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Roman Turovsky 
r.turov...@verizon.net

Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 12:24 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?


FWIW, I've brought this question up in lessons before, suggesting that  a 
unison 6 th course would be a good idea. VERY strong opposition, I  think 
primarily on historical grounds, from Pat O'Brien, Bob Barto and  Richard 
Stone.


DS

On Oct 24, 2009, at 12:03 PM, chriswi...@yahoo.com wrote:

I believe I'll third that.  I went from an octave to a unison on my  old 
lute but now have an octave 6th on the new lute.  I'm finding it  very, 
very difficult to make sense of melodies on the sixth course  that must 
be played with the fingers when the thumb is playing a  diapason at the 
same time.  This happens very often in the late  Weiss years and beyond. 
I don't know of any historical sources  mentioning the unison 6th, 
though.


Chris

--- On Sat, 10/24/09, Roman Turovsky r.turov...@verizon.net wrote:


From: Roman Turovsky r.turov...@verizon.net
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?
To: BAROQUE-LUTE baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 9:19 AM
I'm with Dale on this issue.
RT


- Original Message -
From: Dale Young dyoung5...@wowway.com
To: wikla wi...@cs.helsinki.fi;
baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu;
Edward
Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:31 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave
or no?



I still think that the 6th course is used too often as

a melody string for

that to be octave strung. When I hear the octave jump

at the 6th in a

recording, I find it annoying for anything after 1730.

Just let the basses

start at the 7th...unless you're playing that old

music...then who

cares...not much melody to interfere with anyway.




   cranky boy d.





- Original Message -
From: Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
To: wikla wi...@cs.helsinki.fi;

baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with

octave or no?




Hi, Arto..

Congratulations in finally entering the realm of

baroque lute.  i

hope you find it rewarding.

I think you can string it however you like, using

materials which are

your favorites.

You are correct, in starting octaves at the 6th

course.  One thing I

find the best is to have the tension of the

octaves at least as

strong as the fundamentals.  There was a

practice about 20 years ago,

in which people used the octave only about 80% of

the tension of the

fundamentals, but this yielded unsatisfactory

result, in my

opinion.  This was with Pyramid wound strings

and nylon octaves.


I usually use around 2.9 Kg of tension for the 4th

course to the 13th

course.

One thing to keep in mind is that if you use wound

- overspun basses

starting at the 9th course, where the swan

extension starts, you may

not like it (I do not), as the sustain is too

great.  The very reason

for the added length for the lower basses is to

get a smaller

diameter string, so gut works beautifully for

those courses.  For 13

course lutes with a rider on 12  13, the

length is considerably

shorter, so a wound string may work better in that

application;  but

for the swan necks, gut rules.

Good luck!

ed







At 05:22 PM 10/23/2009, wikla wrote:



And of course I forgot to tell the string

lenghts:

   8 courses (2 single, 6

double) 69 cm on the fingerboard and

   5 (+1) courses 96 cm on the

swan extension


Arto

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:28:53 +0300, wikla

wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
wrote:

Hi b-lutenists,

I happened to get a Martin Hoffmann

lute (with bad stringing) to my

hands. Single strings, old everlasting,

and also rosted, Pyramid

single
basses etc. There are anyhow enough of

pegs to double string

everything
below the two top strings...

I suppose the octave doubles should start

on the 6th course, the A

(and
of course below). Am I right?

Any other stringing advice? What string

tensions do you use? What

string
materials?

Arto



To get on or off this list see list

information at

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute


















To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html








[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?

2009-10-25 Thread Dale Young

h'aint we just something precious then?! Life is too short.
- Original Message - 
From: sterling price spiffys84...@yahoo.com

To: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 12:32 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?


I still maintain that with a little practice it is quite possible to isolate 
the fundamental with the index finger. I do it all the time in Weiss and 
later music.

Sterling




- Original Message 
From: Daniel Shoskes dshos...@mac.com
To: chriswi...@yahoo.com
Cc: BAROQUE-LUTE baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Roman Turovsky 
r.turov...@verizon.net

Sent: Sat, October 24, 2009 12:24:37 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?

FWIW, I've brought this question up in lessons before, suggesting that
a unison 6 th course would be a good idea. VERY strong opposition, I
think primarily on historical grounds, from Pat O'Brien, Bob Barto and
Richard Stone.

DS

On Oct 24, 2009, at 12:03 PM, chriswi...@yahoo.com wrote:


I believe I'll third that. I went from an octave to a unison on my
old lute but now have an octave 6th on the new lute. I'm finding it
very, very difficult to make sense of melodies on the sixth course
that must be played with the fingers when the thumb is playing a
diapason at the same time. This happens very often in the late
Weiss years and beyond. I don't know of any historical sources
mentioning the unison 6th, though.

Chris

--- On Sat, 10/24/09, Roman Turovsky r.turov...@verizon.net wrote:


From: Roman Turovsky r.turov...@verizon.net
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?
To: BAROQUE-LUTE baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 9:19 AM
I'm with Dale on this issue.
RT


- Original Message -
From: Dale Young dyoung5...@wowway.com
To: wikla wi...@cs.helsinki.fi;
baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu;
Edward
Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:31 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave
or no?



I still think that the 6th course is used too often as

a melody string for

that to be octave strung. When I hear the octave jump

at the 6th in a

recording, I find it annoying for anything after 1730.

Just let the basses

start at the 7th...unless you're playing that old

music...then who

cares...not much melody to interfere with anyway.




cranky boy d.





- Original Message -
From: Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
To: wikla wi...@cs.helsinki.fi;

baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with

octave or no?




Hi, Arto..

Congratulations in finally entering the realm of

baroque lute. i

hope you find it rewarding.

I think you can string it however you like, using

materials which are

your favorites.

You are correct, in starting octaves at the 6th

course. One thing I

find the best is to have the tension of the

octaves at least as

strong as the fundamentals. There was a

practice about 20 years ago,

in which people used the octave only about 80% of

the tension of the

fundamentals, but this yielded unsatisfactory

result, in my

opinion. This was with Pyramid wound strings

and nylon octaves.


I usually use around 2.9 Kg of tension for the 4th

course to the 13th

course.

One thing to keep in mind is that if you use wound

- overspun basses

starting at the 9th course, where the swan

extension starts, you may

not like it (I do not), as the sustain is too

great. The very reason

for the added length for the lower basses is to

get a smaller

diameter string, so gut works beautifully for

those courses. For 13

course lutes with a rider on 12  13, the

length is considerably

shorter, so a wound string may work better in that

application; but

for the swan necks, gut rules.

Good luck!

ed







At 05:22 PM 10/23/2009, wikla wrote:



And of course I forgot to tell the string

lenghts:

8 courses (2 single, 6

double) 69 cm on the fingerboard and

5 (+1) courses 96 cm on the

swan extension


Arto

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:28:53 +0300, wikla

wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
wrote:

Hi b-lutenists,

I happened to get a Martin Hoffmann

lute (with bad stringing) to my

hands. Single strings, old everlasting,

and also rosted, Pyramid

single
basses etc. There are anyhow enough of

pegs to double string

everything
below the two top strings...

I suppose the octave doubles should start

on the 6th course, the A

(and
of course below). Am I right?

Any other stringing advice? What string

tensions do you use? What

string
materials?

Arto



To get on or off this list see list

information at

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota 55812
e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com
voice: (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute


















To get on or off this list see list 

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?

2009-10-25 Thread Roman Turovsky

I am with Dale.

IMO it is easier to isolate radioactive isotopes than the octaves in a 
lute-course. Healthier too.


RT

- Original Message - 
From: Dale Young dyoung5...@wowway.com
To: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; sterling price 
spiffys84...@yahoo.com

Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 6:38 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?



h'aint we just something precious then?! Life is too short.
- Original Message - 
From: sterling price spiffys84...@yahoo.com

To: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 12:32 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?


I still maintain that with a little practice it is quite possible to 
isolate the fundamental with the index finger. I do it all the time in 
Weiss and later music.

Sterling




- Original Message 
From: Daniel Shoskes dshos...@mac.com
To: chriswi...@yahoo.com
Cc: BAROQUE-LUTE baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Roman Turovsky 
r.turov...@verizon.net

Sent: Sat, October 24, 2009 12:24:37 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?

FWIW, I've brought this question up in lessons before, suggesting that
a unison 6 th course would be a good idea. VERY strong opposition, I
think primarily on historical grounds, from Pat O'Brien, Bob Barto and
Richard Stone.

DS

On Oct 24, 2009, at 12:03 PM, chriswi...@yahoo.com wrote:


I believe I'll third that. I went from an octave to a unison on my
old lute but now have an octave 6th on the new lute. I'm finding it
very, very difficult to make sense of melodies on the sixth course
that must be played with the fingers when the thumb is playing a
diapason at the same time. This happens very often in the late
Weiss years and beyond. I don't know of any historical sources
mentioning the unison 6th, though.

Chris

--- On Sat, 10/24/09, Roman Turovsky r.turov...@verizon.net wrote:


From: Roman Turovsky r.turov...@verizon.net
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?
To: BAROQUE-LUTE baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 9:19 AM
I'm with Dale on this issue.
RT


- Original Message -
From: Dale Young dyoung5...@wowway.com
To: wikla wi...@cs.helsinki.fi;
baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu;
Edward
Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:31 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave
or no?



I still think that the 6th course is used too often as

a melody string for

that to be octave strung. When I hear the octave jump

at the 6th in a

recording, I find it annoying for anything after 1730.

Just let the basses

start at the 7th...unless you're playing that old

music...then who

cares...not much melody to interfere with anyway.




cranky boy d.





- Original Message -
From: Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
To: wikla wi...@cs.helsinki.fi;

baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with

octave or no?




Hi, Arto..

Congratulations in finally entering the realm of

baroque lute. i

hope you find it rewarding.

I think you can string it however you like, using

materials which are

your favorites.

You are correct, in starting octaves at the 6th

course. One thing I

find the best is to have the tension of the

octaves at least as

strong as the fundamentals. There was a

practice about 20 years ago,

in which people used the octave only about 80% of

the tension of the

fundamentals, but this yielded unsatisfactory

result, in my

opinion. This was with Pyramid wound strings

and nylon octaves.


I usually use around 2.9 Kg of tension for the 4th

course to the 13th

course.

One thing to keep in mind is that if you use wound

- overspun basses

starting at the 9th course, where the swan

extension starts, you may

not like it (I do not), as the sustain is too

great. The very reason

for the added length for the lower basses is to

get a smaller

diameter string, so gut works beautifully for

those courses. For 13

course lutes with a rider on 12  13, the

length is considerably

shorter, so a wound string may work better in that

application; but

for the swan necks, gut rules.

Good luck!

ed







At 05:22 PM 10/23/2009, wikla wrote:



And of course I forgot to tell the string

lenghts:

8 courses (2 single, 6

double) 69 cm on the fingerboard and

5 (+1) courses 96 cm on the

swan extension


Arto

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:28:53 +0300, wikla

wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
wrote:

Hi b-lutenists,

I happened to get a Martin Hoffmann

lute (with bad stringing) to my

hands. Single strings, old everlasting,

and also rosted, Pyramid

single
basses etc. There are anyhow enough of

pegs to double string

everything
below the two top strings...

I suppose the octave doubles should start

on the 6th course, the A

(and
of course below). Am I right?

Any other stringing advice? What string

tensions do you use? What

string
materials?


[LUTE] Re: Bream and Stravinsky

2009-10-25 Thread David Tayler
Wel, it wasn't me.

He could have heard the previous half generation of players, but 
since he asked for Deller's Music for A While on his death bed, I 
would guess it was Desmond Dupre, who
was an excellent player.

Stravinsky was arrested for using a 7th chord in the Star Spangled 
Banner, BTW.
dt

At 06:03 PM 10/24/2009, you wrote:

On Oct 24, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Ed Durbrow wrote:

 What I want to know is who had Stravinsky heard play the lute
  before
 that. ???  Bream said I read that you find the lute very
  beautiful and
 an expressive instrument.

He'd probably heard Bream.
--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Re: Bream and Stravinsky

2009-10-25 Thread Ron Fletcher

Stravinsky was arrested for using a 7th chord in the Star Spangled 
Banner, BTW.

Oh? - So it wasn't homicide, of the bra-strangled stunner?

Sorry for the divergence
Back to topic

Ron (UK)




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Fabulous Concert Last Night

2009-10-25 Thread David Rastall
Hi Luters,

I had the great pleasure of hearing Emma Kirkby and Jakob Lindberg in
concert last evening.  Even now, at 11:00 the next morning, I'm still
feeling awestruck from it.  This was the best early-music concert I
have ever attended.  Just something about their performance seemed to
set it apart from, and above, the rest.  Awesome!!

Actually, let me correct myself on one point:  there were three
performers.  Jakob referred to his lute as the most senior member of
our trio.  It was the 1590 Rauwolf.  After the concert, if that
alone wasn't enough to send me home smiling, I got to meet Emma for
the first time, which was really cool as I've been a long-time fan of
hers, and say hello to Jakob of course, but I also had the
opportunity to hold and examine this Rauwolf lute, and actually to
play on it!  Wow!

Best,

David Rastall
dlu...@verizon.net
www.rastallmusic.com


--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: plucked (and plonked) trio

2009-10-25 Thread William Brohinsky
I have spent an enjoyable week researching the chekker. At least it
was more enjoyable than just sitting around healing.

Anyway, I was able to acquire some of the papers associated with the
Christopher Page article and the Early Music article itself:

The Myth of the Chekker, Christopher Page, EM Vol7, No.4, Keyboard
Issue 1 (Oct.,1979) pp 482-489, Oxford University Press
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/3126484)

Four More 15th-Century Representations of Stringed Keyboard
Instruments, Christopher Page and Lewis Jones) Galpin Society
Journal, Vol 31 (May 1978), pp 151-155, Galpin Society
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/841204)

Toward an Identification of the Chekker, Edwin  M Ripin (op. post.)
Galpin Society Journal, Vol 28 (Apr 1975) pp 11-25, Galpin Society
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/841566)

The Canon and Eschaquiel of the Arabs, Henry George Farmer, Journal
of the Royal Asiatic ZSociety of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 2 (Apr
1926) pp 239-256 (http://www.jstor.com/stable/255220946)

While the background of the last three articles is good to have, it
can be summarized fairly succinctly: The chekker, called at various
times in history by the terms eschiquier, exaquier, chekker,
Schachtbrett, eschaquiel, exquaquiel, exaquir, echiquier, eschequier
Virginal, and assumed at various times to be synonymous with or
derived from al-shaquira (Farmer), an instrument seeming like organs
which sounds like strings (King John I of Aragon),  manicordium
(Ryet),and therefore an upright harpsichord, clavichord (Ripin), and
dulce melos (Arnault de Zwolle), either is or isn't a mysterious
instrument of which no existing example can be produced, or is a mere
synonym for an instrument that is extent.

Much time is spent on the excheqer, a 5' x 10' board covered with a
cloth bought in Easter term with rulings a full span or a foot
apart. (Ripin's translation of a medieval diologus ascribed to
Richard, son of Nigel.) Ripin simultaneously presumes the rulings to
be a reminder of parallel stringed instruments, although the lines
seem to have been both parallel and perpendicular, ala checker board
(or chess board).  It is interesting that the chekker is first
recognized as being referred to in 1360 (according to the first
reference in Rippin's Appendix, which quotes 14th to 16th Century
instances) as leschequier, and the excheqer description (with the
ruled lines a foot or span apart) is from a 12th C source, while the
drawings presented date from 15thC and later sources.

Page starts by deconstructing Farmer's association between Al-shaquira
and eschiquir, kindly not pressing the comparison between Farmer and
Iago...
   But yet, I say,
If imputation and string circumstances
Which lead directly to the door of truth
Will give you satisfaction, you might have't.
..making the chekker controversy entertaining if not necessarily educating.

The final score is chekker 1, musicologists 0, as Page concludes that
Gerson's drawings of the chessboard-shaped excheqer, as a potent
image for the medieval mind, is the best indicator of the shape of
the chekker, at least least at some time. He also figures that the
chekker cannot be isolated to a single type of action, even from its
close positional association in medieval poetry with clavichords or
monochords. His conclusion is that we need more pictorial sources
which are well-connected to mechanisms that resemble the excheqer
before we can begin to guess whether the Chekker was a specific kind
of instrument, or as multi-valued as Instrument might have been in
Praetorius' time.

Clearly,Marc Lewon has grasped the situation, and has assigned the
value chekker to something, secure in the knowledge that no one now
stands to dispute with him, and that, if at sometime in the future
definitive evidence arises to prove that his instrument is not a
chekker, he can still be utterly correct to rename it ex-chekker!

ray



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Fabulous Concert Last Night

2009-10-25 Thread Nedmast2
   Thanks for the information about the wonderful concert, David.  A rare
   opportunity, I suspect.  I've little hope that they'll get down to my
   part of the country.  I would love to hear Jakob's Rauwold instrument
   in person but will have to settle for a CD.  I wonder how the
   modification of 7 or 8 course lutes into 10 or 11 courses was done.
   Assuming the original top was kept, did the interiour barring have to
   be modified to withstand the added tension?  I also wonder, having
   heard and even played the instrument, in what ways you found the sound
   and response different from a modern instrument.



   Ned

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: plucked (and plonked) trio

2009-10-25 Thread Monica Hall
Not sure whether this is relevant as have not been following the thread 
closely but apparently the earliest surviving clavier is a 
clavicytherium in the collection of the Royal College of Music (London). 
The instrument can have wire or gut strings.


Monica


- Original Message - 
From: William Brohinsky tiorbin...@gmail.com

To: Stuart Walsh s.wa...@ntlworld.com
Cc: lute Net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 4:26 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: plucked (and plonked) trio



I have spent an enjoyable week researching the chekker. At least it
was more enjoyable than just sitting around healing.

Anyway, I was able to acquire some of the papers associated with the
Christopher Page article and the Early Music article itself:

The Myth of the Chekker, Christopher Page, EM Vol7, No.4, Keyboard
Issue 1 (Oct.,1979) pp 482-489, Oxford University Press
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/3126484)

Four More 15th-Century Representations of Stringed Keyboard
Instruments, Christopher Page and Lewis Jones) Galpin Society
Journal, Vol 31 (May 1978), pp 151-155, Galpin Society
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/841204)

Toward an Identification of the Chekker, Edwin  M Ripin (op. post.)
Galpin Society Journal, Vol 28 (Apr 1975) pp 11-25, Galpin Society
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/841566)

The Canon and Eschaquiel of the Arabs, Henry George Farmer, Journal
of the Royal Asiatic ZSociety of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 2 (Apr
1926) pp 239-256 (http://www.jstor.com/stable/255220946)

While the background of the last three articles is good to have, it
can be summarized fairly succinctly: The chekker, called at various
times in history by the terms eschiquier, exaquier, chekker,
Schachtbrett, eschaquiel, exquaquiel, exaquir, echiquier, eschequier
Virginal, and assumed at various times to be synonymous with or
derived from al-shaquira (Farmer), an instrument seeming like organs
which sounds like strings (King John I of Aragon),  manicordium
(Ryet),and therefore an upright harpsichord, clavichord (Ripin), and
dulce melos (Arnault de Zwolle), either is or isn't a mysterious
instrument of which no existing example can be produced, or is a mere
synonym for an instrument that is extent.

Much time is spent on the excheqer, a 5' x 10' board covered with a
cloth bought in Easter term with rulings a full span or a foot
apart. (Ripin's translation of a medieval diologus ascribed to
Richard, son of Nigel.) Ripin simultaneously presumes the rulings to
be a reminder of parallel stringed instruments, although the lines
seem to have been both parallel and perpendicular, ala checker board
(or chess board).  It is interesting that the chekker is first
recognized as being referred to in 1360 (according to the first
reference in Rippin's Appendix, which quotes 14th to 16th Century
instances) as leschequier, and the excheqer description (with the
ruled lines a foot or span apart) is from a 12th C source, while the
drawings presented date from 15thC and later sources.

Page starts by deconstructing Farmer's association between Al-shaquira
and eschiquir, kindly not pressing the comparison between Farmer and
Iago...
  But yet, I say,
If imputation and string circumstances
Which lead directly to the door of truth
Will give you satisfaction, you might have't.
..making the chekker controversy entertaining if not necessarily 
educating.


The final score is chekker 1, musicologists 0, as Page concludes that
Gerson's drawings of the chessboard-shaped excheqer, as a potent
image for the medieval mind, is the best indicator of the shape of
the chekker, at least least at some time. He also figures that the
chekker cannot be isolated to a single type of action, even from its
close positional association in medieval poetry with clavichords or
monochords. His conclusion is that we need more pictorial sources
which are well-connected to mechanisms that resemble the excheqer
before we can begin to guess whether the Chekker was a specific kind
of instrument, or as multi-valued as Instrument might have been in
Praetorius' time.

Clearly,Marc Lewon has grasped the situation, and has assigned the
value chekker to something, secure in the knowledge that no one now
stands to dispute with him, and that, if at sometime in the future
definitive evidence arises to prove that his instrument is not a
chekker, he can still be utterly correct to rename it ex-chekker!

ray



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 





[LUTE] Re: plucked (and plonked) trio

2009-10-25 Thread Stuart Walsh

William Brohinsky wrote:

I have spent an enjoyable week researching the chekker. At least it
was more enjoyable than just sitting around healing.

Anyway, I was able to acquire some of the papers associated with the
Christopher Page article and the Early Music article itself:

The Myth of the Chekker, Christopher Page, EM Vol7, No.4, Keyboard
Issue 1 (Oct.,1979) pp 482-489, Oxford University Press
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/3126484)

Four More 15th-Century Representations of Stringed Keyboard
Instruments, Christopher Page and Lewis Jones) Galpin Society
Journal, Vol 31 (May 1978), pp 151-155, Galpin Society
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/841204)

Toward an Identification of the Chekker, Edwin  M Ripin (op. post.)
Galpin Society Journal, Vol 28 (Apr 1975) pp 11-25, Galpin Society
(http://www.jstor.org/stable/841566)

The Canon and Eschaquiel of the Arabs, Henry George Farmer, Journal
of the Royal Asiatic ZSociety of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 2 (Apr
1926) pp 239-256 (http://www.jstor.com/stable/255220946)

While the background of the last three articles is good to have, it
can be summarized fairly succinctly: The chekker, called at various
times in history by the terms eschiquier, exaquier, chekker,
Schachtbrett, eschaquiel, exquaquiel, exaquir, echiquier, eschequier
Virginal, and assumed at various times to be synonymous with or
derived from al-shaquira (Farmer), an instrument seeming like organs
which sounds like strings (King John I of Aragon),  manicordium
(Ryet),and therefore an upright harpsichord, clavichord (Ripin), and
dulce melos (Arnault de Zwolle), either is or isn't a mysterious
instrument of which no existing example can be produced, or is a mere
synonym for an instrument that is extent.

Much time is spent on the excheqer, a 5' x 10' board covered with a
cloth bought in Easter term with rulings a full span or a foot
apart. (Ripin's translation of a medieval diologus ascribed to
Richard, son of Nigel.) Ripin simultaneously presumes the rulings to
be a reminder of parallel stringed instruments, although the lines
seem to have been both parallel and perpendicular, ala checker board
(or chess board).  It is interesting that the chekker is first
recognized as being referred to in 1360 (according to the first
reference in Rippin's Appendix, which quotes 14th to 16th Century
instances) as leschequier, and the excheqer description (with the
ruled lines a foot or span apart) is from a 12th C source, while the
drawings presented date from 15thC and later sources.

Page starts by deconstructing Farmer's association between Al-shaquira
and eschiquir, kindly not pressing the comparison between Farmer and
Iago...
   But yet, I say,
If imputation and string circumstances
Which lead directly to the door of truth
Will give you satisfaction, you might have't.
..making the chekker controversy entertaining if not necessarily educating.

The final score is chekker 1, musicologists 0, as Page concludes that
Gerson's drawings of the chessboard-shaped excheqer, as a potent
image for the medieval mind, is the best indicator of the shape of
the chekker, at least least at some time. He also figures that the
chekker cannot be isolated to a single type of action, even from its
close positional association in medieval poetry with clavichords or
monochords. His conclusion is that we need more pictorial sources
which are well-connected to mechanisms that resemble the excheqer
before we can begin to guess whether the Chekker was a specific kind
of instrument, or as multi-valued as Instrument might have been in
Praetorius' time.

Clearly,Marc Lewon has grasped the situation, and has assigned the
value chekker to something, secure in the knowledge that no one now
stands to dispute with him, and that, if at sometime in the future
definitive evidence arises to prove that his instrument is not a
chekker, he can still be utterly correct to rename it ex-chekker!

ray

  


Great summary! As I understand it, Marc Lewon is in a number of 
ensembles and he doesn't appear to be the leader or artistic director:  
He plays the lute, gittern, vielle and he sings. The members of the 
groups he is in all seem to be ex-students of the Schola Cantorum of 
Basel. When I emailed him about the dulce melos, he referred me to the 
player of that instrument. (I emailed her but she hasn't replied - No 
she just did this second - really friendly and positive!). I've looked 
all over Marc's site and links to the ensembles he is in but I can't 
find a chekker player anywhere!


His site is here:

http://www.lewon.de/index.php?lg=en

and if you dig around (and the links to the ensembles) there are lots 
(lots) of mp3s and other things.


He's a very fast gittern player! The playing is very pert and springy.

Corina Marti plays a claviciterium on a CD,  'Von Edler Art' with 
Michael Gondko on gittern and lute - this is more delicate than springy 
and Gondko's lute playing is just exquisite. My local library has an old 
set of complete Dufay by the 

[LUTE] lute joke request

2009-10-25 Thread Nancy Carlin
   [1]Forward this message to a friend
   Sopranos 100 : Lute 1 - HELP!
   October 25, 2009
   Tom Strini (now of Third Coast Digest) insists that there is only
   [2]ONE lute joke (scroll down), while sopranos appear to have HUNDREDS!
   Surely you can help even things out a bit. If you have a really good
   lute joke, email it to i...@earlymusicnow.org TODAY.
   FROM EARLY MUSIC NOW
   The winning joke (if there is one) will be read at the October 27
   concert, and the winning jokester will receive a copy of Kirkby 
   Lindberg's latest CD, autographed by both artists.. One joke per email,
   please, and duplicates will be eliminated based on the time-stamp of
   the email. Jakob Lindberg will determine the winner from any (being
   optimistic) that are submitted, and the CD (signed by both artists)
   will be presented to the winning jokester.
   The long-time collaboration of Dame Emma Kirkby and Jakob Lindberg is
   no joke. This is the first time the duo has toured the United States,
   and Milwaukee is one of only 10 cities fortunate enough to hear this
   stunning program of music of Purcell and Dowland. Lindberg's lute is
   old enough that Dowland may actually have heard it, and the popularity
   and familiarity of Purcell's tunes might well have made him the Andrew
   Lloyd Webber of his day!
   This celebration of Purcell's 350th birth anniversary is this Tuesday,
   October 27th, at 7:30 at Wisconsin Lutheran College. Program details
   and ticket information [3]here.
   Both artists will also present FREE masterclasses at the UWM Fine Arts
   Recital Hall TOMORROW (Monday) from 4:30 to 7:00. More information
   [4]here.

   Nancy Carlin Associates
   P.O. Box 6499
   Concord, CA 94524  USA
   phone 925/686-5800 fax 925/680-2582
   web site - [5]www.nancycarlinassociates.com
   Representing:
   FROM WALES - Robin Huw Bowen, Crasdant   Carreg Lafar,  FROM ENGLAND -
   Jez Lowe  Jez Lowe  The Bad Pennies,  FROM SPAIN - La Musgana and now
   representing EARLY MUSIC - The Venere Lute Quartet, Paul Beier  The
   Good Pennyworths
   Administrator THE LUTE SOCIETY OF AMERICA
   web site - [6]http://LuteSocietyofAmerica.org
   --

References

   1. 
http://oi.vresp.com/f2af/v4/send_to_friend.html?ch=9fb3646679lid=166ldh=c6016a38e4
   2. http://cts.vresp.com/c/?EarlyMusicNow/9fb3646679/c6016a38e4/d5e3122950
   3. http://cts.vresp.com/c/?EarlyMusicNow/9fb3646679/c6016a38e4/69f121eb7b
   4. http://cts.vresp.com/c/?EarlyMusicNow/9fb3646679/c6016a38e4/0d519b2482
   5. http://www.nancycarlinassociates.com/
   6. http://lutesocietyofamerica.org/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Fabulous Concert Last Night

2009-10-25 Thread Nancy Carlin
   Hi Ned,
   The LSA ran an interesting interview with Jakob in the Quarterly in
   2007 - I'm mailing you a copy.  There was also an article in the Lute
   Society's  (English) Lute News on the Rauwolf instrument.
   Nancy

Thanks for the information about the wonderful concert, David.  A
 rare
opportunity, I suspect.  I've little hope that they'll get down
 to my
part of the country.  I would love to hear Jakob's Rauwold
 instrument
in person but will have to settle for a CD.  I wonder how the
modification of 7 or 8 course lutes into 10 or 11 courses was
 done.
Assuming the original top was kept, did the interiour barring
 have to
be modified to withstand the added tension?  I also wonder,
 having
heard and even played the instrument, in what ways you found the
 sound
and response different from a modern instrument.
Ned
--
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   Nancy Carlin Associates
   P.O. Box 6499
   Concord, CA 94524  USA
   phone 925/686-5800 fax 925/680-2582
   web site - [2]www.nancycarlinassociates.com
   Representing:
   FROM WALES - Robin Huw Bowen, Crasdant   Carreg Lafar,  FROM ENGLAND -
   Jez Lowe  Jez Lowe  The Bad Pennies,  FROM SPAIN - La Musgana and now
   representing EARLY MUSIC - The Venere Lute Quartet, Paul Beier  The
   Good Pennyworths
   Administrator THE LUTE SOCIETY OF AMERICA
   web site - [3]http://LuteSocietyofAmerica.org
   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   2. http://www.nancycarlinassociates.com/
   3. http://lutesocietyofamerica.org/



[LUTE] Continuo

2009-10-25 Thread Bruno Correia
   A quesion for continuo experts: I am about to play continuo (5 course
   guitar) on Dido and Aeneas (Purcell). Unfortunately I received a full
   score of the opera, which is very hard to acompany in this format. Is
   there a version for bass and the top line? That would save paper and
   make everything much easier (no page turns...).



   Regards.

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Continuo

2009-10-25 Thread howard posner

On Oct 25, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Bruno Correia wrote:

 Unfortunately I received a full
score of the opera, which is very hard to acompany in this
 format. Is
there a version for bass and the top line? That would save paper
 and
make everything much easier (no page turns...).

It might also give you a version that differs from the one that you
will be performing.  There are a some editorial choices/additions
that are made in Dido; indeed, if I remember right, the numbers with
gittars, indicated in the 1689 Josiah Priest school libretto, are
not in the surviving score, which dates from at least 50 years later,
and have to be added (by repeating the music from vocal numbers or
some other way).  So proceed with caution if you're going to use some
other version.

Safer to take the time to photocopy and cut up the part (after using
the lower parts to figure the bass).
--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html