[LUTE] Re: S.L.Weiss, Prelude WeissSW 33.1

2015-05-19 Thread Markus Lutz

Hello Dennis,
in the original there is no flag at all (we should change that on 
mss.slweiss.de ...). These preludes are relative freely, sort of 
prélude non mesuré as you wrote, but very often they have some pulse 
in it, that you can find, if you play it several times

I would say, it is in the response of the player to make sense out of it.

Best regards
Markus


Am 18.05.2015 um 10:06 schrieb dc:

I'm trying to make rhythmical sense of this prelude (WeissSW 33.1)

This site:
http://mss.slweiss.de/index.php?id=1type=msms=D-Dl2841-1lang=deushowmss=1

gives a quarter note at the beginning of the tablature

And here there is no rhythmical value:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/60516846/Partitions_pour_luth_baroque/Musiques/Les_manuscrits/Dresde/Tablature/Volume_1/WD1_Suite_1.pdf


The transcription gives mostly 16th notes, though they don't fit into a
regular meter, at least at the beginnin.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/60516846/Partitions_pour_luth_baroque/Musiques/Les_manuscrits/Dresde/Notation_musicale/Volume_1/WD1_Suite_1.pdf


Is this a sort of prélude non mesuré?  Do the slurs give any metrical
indication? Is there any way of knowing which notes fall on the beat
in the first two staves?

Thanks.

Dennis





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



--

Markus Lutz
Schulstraße 11

88422 Bad Buchau

Tel  0 75 82 / 92 62 89
Fax  0 75 82 / 92 62 90
Mail mar...@gmlutz.de




[LUTE] Re: dedillo

2015-05-19 Thread Martin Shepherd
Excellent!  Can you give us any advice on how to do it?  I've always 
wondered whether it was necessary to support the index finger with the 
thumb, for instance, in which case it would be like using a very fat 
stiff plectrum, or whether the movement is just of the index finger.


Martin

On 18/05/2015 23:18, Robert Barto wrote:

[1]https://youtu.be/Cn6fmQXP2Pc
Here is a first attempt at dedillo with one of the Milan Fantasies.

  __

[2]Avast logo

Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprueft.
[3]www.avast.com

--

References

1. https://youtu.be/Cn6fmQXP2Pc
2. http://www.avast.com/
3. http://www.avast.com/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com




[LUTE] Re: dedillo

2015-05-19 Thread Anton Höger

Mastering the dedillo



http://www.ralphmaier.com/index_files/Page318.htm 
http://www.ralphmaier.com/index_files/Page318.htm





--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: S.L.Weiss, Prelude WeissSW 33.1

2015-05-19 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Indeed. And, as an aid to finding your own interpretation, try and
   identify the harmonic changes (often, but not always, concurrent with a
   low bass) and shape your arpeggios and scalic passages around these
   phrases. Bear in mind that in these unmeasured works flags are only the
   crudest of indicators: variations of speed within phrases is, in my
   view, stylistically acceptable and to be promoted.
   MH
 __

   From: Markus Lutz mar...@gmlutz.de
   To: dc den...@free.fr; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2015, 8:27
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: S.L.Weiss, Prelude WeissSW 33.1
   Hello Dennis,
   in the original there is no flag at all (we should change that on
   mss.slweiss.de ...). These preludes are relative freely, sort of
   prA(c)lude non mesurA(c) as you wrote, but very often they have some
   pulse
   in it, that you can find, if you play it several times
   I would say, it is in the response of the player to make sense out of
   it.
   Best regards
   Markus
   Am 18.05.2015 um 10:06 schrieb dc:
I'm trying to make rhythmical sense of this prelude (WeissSW 33.1)
   
This site:
   
   [1]http://mss.slweiss.de/index.php?id=1type=msms=D-Dl2841-1langTHu;
   showmss=1
   
gives a quarter note at the beginning of the tablature
   
And here there is no rhythmical value:
   
   [2]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/60516846/Partitions_pour_luth_b
   aroque/Musiques/Les_manuscrits/Dresde/Tablature/Volume_1/WD1_Suite_1.pd
   f
   
   
The transcription gives mostly 16th notes, though they don't fit into
   a
regular meter, at least at the beginnin.
   
   [3]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/60516846/Partitions_pour_luth_b
   aroque/Musiques/Les_manuscrits/Dresde/Notation_musicale/Volume_1/WD1_Su
   ite_1.pdf
   
   
Is this a sort of prA(c)lude non mesurA(c)?  Do the slurs give any
   metrical
indication? Is there any way of knowing which notes fall on the
   beat
in the first two staves?
   
Thanks.
   
Dennis
   
   
   
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
[4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   --
   Markus Lutz
   SchulstraAe 11
   88422 Bad Buchau
   Tel  0 75 82 / 92 62 89
   Fax  0 75 82 / 92 62 90
   Mail [5]mar...@gmlutz.de

   --

References

   1. 
http://mss.slweiss.de/index.php?id=1type=msms=D-Dl2841-1lang%C3%9Eushowmss=1
   2. 
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/60516846/Partitions_pour_luth_baroque/Musiques/Les_manuscrits/Dresde/Tablature/Volume_1/WD1_Suite_1.pdf
   3. 
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/60516846/Partitions_pour_luth_baroque/Musiques/Les_manuscrits/Dresde/Notation_musicale/Volume_1/WD1_Suite_1.pdf
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. mailto:mar...@gmlutz.de



[LUTE] Re: Gut string diameters

2015-05-19 Thread Markus Lutz

Hello,
in the Krünitz (Oekonomische Encyklopädie oder allgemeines System der
Staats- Stadt- Haus- und Landwirthschaft = economical encyclopedy or
common system of the economy of State, town, house and agriculture -
1773 - 1858) there are descriptions how they used to make strings.
But probably these descriptions are from the 19th century already; and 
he also mentions that the string makers made a secret of their 
procedures (Article on strings, Saiten - Volume 130, p. 633ff).



Zu den feinsten Mandolinsaiten werden nur zwei Därme zusammengedreht; zu
den Primviolinsaiten drei Stück; zu den letzten Violinsaiten sieben
Stück, zu den dicksten Kontrabaßsaiten dreht man wohl hundert und
zwanzig ineinander.


- they used 2 guts for mandolin strings, 3 for prime violin, 7 for the
thickest violin strings, and for the thick strings of the contra bass
they used 120 guts.

If you also take into consideration, that the guts also differ in 
thickness etc. - there is still much room for different sizes.


But I'm pretty sure the makers then knew what they did and selected them 
maybe even manually and by sight.


BTW - it is written there, that the best strings are made of at least 
7-8 months young animals (sheep, goat, calves and cat).


Best regards
Markus



Am 18.05.2015 um 22:36 schrieb Lex van Sante:

Hi all,

This contraption was said to be invented by the 19th century
violinist and composer Louis Spohr. But you could be right in that it
was already in existence and Spohr made it famous.

Lex

Op 18 mei 2015, om 22:26 heeft Miles Dempster het volgende
geschreven:


Hi Sean,

A 'V' shaped notch formed by two straight edges set at a small
angle to eachother can measure small thicknesses very accurately.
The thickness of the string is measured by how far you can put the
string into the notch. It wouldn't surprise me if something like
this could have used.


Miles




On May 18, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Sean Smith lutesm...@mac.com wrote:



Thanks, Martin. The idea that in a bundle you'll have an average
and outliers makes sense.


...if you're going to make a homemade roped string (3 strands)
the second course is what you use to make a 5th course and the
3rd is what you use to make a 6th course, but I don't think
anybody did this in the 16th century.


What then would have been the procedure instead? The stringmaker
has a better finished product (as nowadays) perhaps using custom
diameters? Or maybe the lengths sold would not have been
conducive to amateur stringbuilding? Solid gut? If it was indeed
more springy then solid may have been more acceptable.

The nice thing about the roped strings is that while they can be
expensive they do last well. If they sound _too_ dead, it's time
to change the octave.

The reason I bring this up is that I'm pretty parsimonious when
it comes to strings and that would have been an issue for many
lutenists without a supportive patron. Would there have been some
players who had a deal w/ the local butcher for materials and
made their own?

There's an old Japanese saying that when the winds come up the
cats disappear!

Sean


On May 18, 2015, at 12:42 PM, Martin Shepherd wrote:

Hi Sean,

Your friend was right - if you're going to make a homemade roped
string (3 strands) the second course is what you use to make a
5th course and the 3rd is what you use to make a 6th course, but
I don't think anybody did this in the 16th century.

My suspicion is that they bought a bundle of strings labelled
3rd course or whatever, then selected their 3rd course strings
from amongst them.  The bundle would have included strings of
various diameters, around a mean which was determined by the way
they were made (how many guts, how they were twisted etc).  This
kind of system persisted until the 20th century for violin
strings.

If I'm right, this also means that when Dowland says use a 4th
course string for the first two frets he doesn't necessarily mean
two frets of exactly the same diameter.  He could have graded all
the frets very precisely by choosing slightly bigger or smaller
strings from each bundle.

M

On 18/05/2015 21:18, Sean Smith wrote:

In buying and using our lute strings we place an awful lot of
faith in our micrometers. I see people changing strings for
going up or down a tone or even a semitone. Yes, I think I can
feel the tension change and hear it to some degree but we're
often talking a difference of microns in string difference.

For example, a change of .42 to a .43 is 10 microns which is
not repeatable on my smaller micrometers (even digital) but is
on the 6 digital micrometer. For rougher measurements, say,
between 1st, 2nd and 3rd courses, the delta is easily seen/felt
and I think that even I could make a measurement device for
that for further refinement.

In the 16th century, of course, there were no micrometers
although I'm sure there were fairly accurate (and perhaps,
secret?) methods of fine measurement. I'm wondering how they
worked out the diameters. Any place I could read 

[LUTE] Lodomericae 37

2015-05-19 Thread r.turov...@gmail.com

http://torban.org/lodomericae/audio/481.mp3
http://torban.org/lodomericae/images/481.pdf
CANTIO LODOMERICA XXXVIІ

RT

On 5/11/2015 9:38 PM, r.turov...@gmail.com wrote:

http://torban.org/lodomericae/audio/480.mp3
http://torban.org/lodomericae/images/480.pdf

http://torban.org/lodomericae/audio/479.mp3
http://torban.org/lodomericae/images/479.pdf

Enjoy!
Amities,
RT



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: dedillo

2015-05-19 Thread Dan Winheld

Robert-

Thanks very much for the vids; especially from the two different hand 
orientations- but now I hear the same problems with sound that caused me 
to abandon further pursuit of the technique, only your greater patience 
and stronger commitment have yielded better results; I like what 95% of 
what I hear when you do it- but so far I hate at least 50% (Back of the 
nail- can't get rid of that) of what I hear when I do it. Also, certain 
string crossings (esp. descending) annoyed me.


What does that instrument sound like uncapoed? Just personal, but I 
prefer the lower pitched instruments- G instruments at a-415 down to E 
or sometimes D.


Dan


On 5/19/2015 2:33 PM, Robert Barto wrote:

Thanks for your interest and kind responses.

I'm playing on a viola da mano (60cm) by Richard Fletcher with a capo 
on the second fret. (I have a smaller one on order.)


I have a few test videos of dedillo here:

https://youtu.be/Oe0TYyR8TM4

and here from a few months ago in a more thumb out phase:

https://youtu.be/6565xf2yQbA

Please let me know if they are of any use and how they could be 
better. (I'm just using my phone camera.)










---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
http://www.avast.com






To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: dedillo

2015-05-19 Thread Robert Barto

Hi Martin,

I'm not sure how clearly one can see on the videos, but i think I mainly 
just move the finger leaving the last joint fairly loose. In some 
situations the thumb can be planted, but sometimes one has to land on 
the thumb to come back up, and then it has to be free.


Both thumb out and thumb under have certain advantages but with thumb 
under angle it's possible to almost entirely avoid the nail on the back 
stroke.


Robert


---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
http://www.avast.com




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: dedillo

2015-05-19 Thread Robert Barto

Thanks for your interest and kind responses.

I'm playing on a viola da mano (60cm) by Richard Fletcher with a capo on 
the second fret. (I have a smaller one on order.)


I have a few test videos of dedillo here:

https://youtu.be/Oe0TYyR8TM4

and here from a few months ago in a more thumb out phase:

https://youtu.be/6565xf2yQbA

Please let me know if they are of any use and how they could be better. 
(I'm just using my phone camera.)










---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
http://www.avast.com




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html