[LUTE] Re: Better UNICODE Test �� �� ���� �� ����
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 14:41 CEST, Wayne schrieb: > >�� Thanks a lot! Word encoding seems to work now. And even so my humble emacs can't display emojis I appreciate your reference to the original context :-) Cheers, RalfD > > Wayne > > > > > > Dear Rainer, > > > > Just to check, this is using the normal Mac > > keystrokes for diacriticals, I wonder if it will > > be mangled by the Lute Net software? > > > > Ü Ä Ö ä ö ü é â è > > > > Best wishes, > > > > David > > > > At 14:20 +0200 29/7/17, Rainer wrote: > >> I have sent this mail with utf-8 encoding and everything looks OK. > >> > >> Rainer > >> > >> > >> On 29.07.2017 13:40, Rainer wrote: > >>> German: ÄÖÜ äöü ß > >>> > >>> French:éâàè > >>> > >>> > > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Better UNICODE Test �� �� ���� �� ����
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 16:48 CEST, Wayne schrieb: > So one of the issues, with Subject or Body, is that when an encoded message > is unpacked for reading, > and then recoded for a reply or forwarding, the several different mail > reader/editors involved in the > process tend to mess things up. I was not able to read the emojis in your > reply to the list. > > Wayne No, I think the situation is much less grimm. I was reading your last mail with a webmail client which replaced the unknown emoji characters (not in the font I use for reading) with those substitute characters. So what you probably got back in the reply body was a properly encoded substitute character. I wouldn't use emojis as a typical use case for unicode ... (just tested with my iPad and the emojis display correct). Cheers, RalfD To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html