[LUTE] Re: Better UNICODE Test �� �� ���� �� ����

[Ralf Mattes]

Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 16:48 CEST, Wayne  schrieb:

> So one of the issues, with Subject or Body, is that when an encoded message 
> is unpacked for reading,
> and then recoded for a reply or forwarding, the several different mail 
> reader/editors involved in the
> process tend to mess things up.  I was not able to read the emojis in your 
> reply to the list.
>
>   Wayne

No, I think the situation is much less grimm. I was reading your last mail with 
a webmail
client which replaced the unknown emoji characters (not in the font I use for 
reading) with
those substitute characters. So what you probably got back in the reply body 
was a properly
encoded substitute character. I wouldn't use emojis as a typical use case for 
unicode ...
(just tested with my iPad and the emojis display correct).

Cheers, RalfD





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] Re: Better UNICODE Test �� �� ���� �� ����

[Ralf Mattes]

 
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 14:41 CEST, Wayne  schrieb: 
 
> 
>��

Thanks a lot! Word encoding seems to work now. And even so my humble emacs 
can't display emojis I
appreciate your reference to the original context :-)

Cheers, RalfD

> 
> Wayne
> 
> 
> > 
> > Dear Rainer,
> > 
> > Just to check, this is using the normal Mac 
> > keystrokes for diacriticals, I wonder if it will 
> > be mangled by the Lute Net software?
> > 
> > Ü Ä Ö  ä ö ü é â è
> > 
> > Best wishes,
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > At 14:20 +0200 29/7/17, Rainer wrote:
> >> I have sent this mail with utf-8 encoding and everything looks OK.
> >> 
> >> Rainer
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 29.07.2017 13:40, Rainer wrote:
> >>> German:  ÄÖÜ äöü ß
> >>> 
> >>> French:éâàè
> >>> 
> >>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html